1 / 20

TR Labs

TR Labs. R&D Consortia: a Case Study. TR Labs. Industry. University. Government. R&D Consortia. A Growing Trend 200 - 300 in North America A Special Form of Strategic Alliance. TR Labs. Why Consortia in R&D?. Leverage • Synergy • Complementarity. Resources Skills/Personnel

adolph
Télécharger la présentation

TR Labs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TRLabs R&D Consortia: a Case Study

  2. TRLabs Industry University Government R&D Consortia • A Growing Trend • 200 - 300 in North America • A Special Form of Strategic Alliance

  3. TRLabs Why Consortia in R&D? Leverage • Synergy • Complementarity • Resources • Skills/Personnel • Financial • Markets • Technology

  4. TRLabs National Economic Prosperity Positive Effects • Capability in Science & Technology • People - Quality of Labour • Infrastructure • Public/Private Sector Cooperation

  5. TRLabs Participants SMEs MNEs Universities Governments

  6. TRLabs Industry Participation • Leverage • Technology & People Outputs • Public Relations • Networking with Strategic Partners • Univeristy/Academic Interaction

  7. TRLabs University Participation • Relevance to Industry and Society • Financial Benefits • Research Output • Education & Student Placement

  8. TRLabs Government Participation • Economic Development • Infrastructure Development • S&T Capability • Human Resource Development

  9. TRLabs Types of Consortia • Open vs Closed Membership • Horizontal vs Vertical vs Inter-Sectoral • Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led • For-Profit vs Not-for-Profit • Pre-Competitive vs Competitive • Perpetual vs Limited Life • Administrative vs Operational • Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented • Holds IP vs No IP • Directed vs Pooled Research • Buffet vs a la Carte

  10. TRLabs TRLabsA Successful Examplesince 1986

  11. TRLabs Designing TRLabs • Openvs Closed • Open to Any Organization

  12. TRLabs Designing TRLabs • Horizontal vsVertical vs Inter-sectoral • Telecom & Information Technology

  13. TRLabs Designing TRLabs Government-Led vs Industry-Led vs University-Led • Senior Board Representation • Majority from Industry • Chairman from Industry • President from Industry

  14. TRLabs Designing TRLabs For-Profit vsNot-for-Profit • Surplus not Taxable • No Dividend Payout • R&D Tax Credits for Members

  15. TRLabs Designing TRLabs • Pre-Competitive vs Competitive Design & Engineering Application Development Basic Research Applied Research Product Development UNIVERSITY INDUSTRY

  16. TRLabs Pre-Competitive Collaboration

  17. TRLabs Designing TRLabs • Perpetual vs Limited Life 5 Year, Renewable Agreements

  18. TRLabs Designing TRLabs Administrative vs Operational • Network of Laboratories • Quality of Interaction • Industry Secondments • Student Education Facilities

  19. TRLabs Generate Outputs in People & Technology to support the Goals of its Members Business Advantage Academic Achievement Economic Development Designing TRLabs • Project Oriented vs Goal Oriented

  20. TRLabs Staff Industry Researchers Sponsors Commercialization Third Professors Parties Rights held by TRLabs University Industry Sponsors Researchers Education, Research Inventors Students Designing TRLabs • Holds IP vs No IP

More Related