1 / 24

Michigan Requirements PA-25

Education YES! Updates and Plans. Michigan Department of EducationOffice of Educational Assessment and AccountabilityOffice of School ImprovementNovember - 2006. 6/16/2012. 3. School Improvement Framework. Purposes of the School Improvement FrameworkProvide a common frame for continuous schoo

adora
Télécharger la présentation

Michigan Requirements PA-25

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. 6/17/2012 1 Michigan Requirements PA-25 School Improvement Annual Report Core Curriculum Accreditation – Ed YES!

    2. Education YES! Updates and Plans Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Office of School Improvement November - 2006 Education YES is Michigan’s school accreditation system. It is a new system designed to meet the needs of the 21st century.Education YES is Michigan’s school accreditation system. It is a new system designed to meet the needs of the 21st century.

    3. 6/17/2012 3 School Improvement Framework Purposes of the School Improvement Framework Provide a common frame for continuous school improvement Provide a common vocabulary regarding school improvement Provide new, research-based indicators for Education YES! (School Leadership That Works- ASCD)

    4. 6/17/2012 4 School Improvement Framework 39 Evidence Bearing Indicators All 5 Strands Strand 1: 11 Indicators Strand 2: 10 Indicators Strand 3: 6 Indicators Strand 4: 5 Indicators Strand 5: 7 Indicators

    5. 6/17/2012 5 School Improvement Framework

    6. 6/17/2012 6 Education YES! This is the big picture, showing all of the pieces of the system. It includes both indicators of school performance and measures of student achievement. The indicators come from research and best practice. They are critical for establishing a fair system for Michigan school accountability. They may be seen as investments in improved learning.This is the big picture, showing all of the pieces of the system. It includes both indicators of school performance and measures of student achievement. The indicators come from research and best practice. They are critical for establishing a fair system for Michigan school accountability. They may be seen as investments in improved learning.

    7. 6/17/2012 7 Indicators 2002-2006

    8. 6/17/2012 8 SI Framework Structure

    9. 6/17/2012 9 The SI Framework

    10. 6/17/2012 10

    11. 6/17/2012 11 Benchmarks

    12. 6/17/2012 12 Education YES! Plans 2006-07 Statewide Pilot Indicators based on School Improvement Framework Display External Data Display “Extra Credit” Plan revisions for student achievement

    13. 6/17/2012 13 Education YES! Plans 2007-08 Revised School Report Card Credit for reporting self-rating, evidence and Action Plan External Data part of Ed YES “Extra Credit” Student Progress as part of student achievement

    14. 6/17/2012 14 Indicators of School Performance Rubrics developed based on the School Improvement Framework 90 rubrics were pilot tested in the spring of 2006 2006-07 reporting based on the new rubrics 39 rubrics have been selected for reporting in 2006-07 by all schools All rubrics are available for school use

    15. 6/17/2012 15 Sample Characteristic Strand 1: Teaching for Learning Standard 3: Assessment Benchmark A: Aligned to Curriculum and Instruction Characteristic/Key Attribute 3. Multiple Measures Staff members view student assessment in the broad sense as an on-going process that includes aligned standardized assessments, daily informal assessments, periodic benchmark assessments as well as a variety of culminating assessments.

    16. 6/17/2012 16 Sample Self-Rating

    17. 6/17/2012 17 Sample Evidence Most teachers rely on an array of assessments to determine student achievement, i.e. classroom –based tests, MEAP, student portfolios and writing samples. Formal assessments are sometimes aligned to curriculum. Assessments being used are changing so this will improve. Data review meetings for all staff held monthly. Team meetings to review grade level data held weekly. Assessments used: MEAP 3-8 Textbook pre/post tests Scantron grades 3-8 Terra Nova K-2 Teacher-created assessments Dibels Harcourt Assessment IOWA

    18. 6/17/2012 18 Suggested Data Sources

    19. 6/17/2012 19 Scoring Indicators 2006-07 Schools will get “credit” for completing the self-rating and evidence School must report some text in the evidence for all reported characteristics Scoring methods will be documented prior to data collection Little penalty for “Partially Implemented” and “Getting Started”

    20. 6/17/2012 20 External Data 2006-07 All Levels Percent Highly Qualified Teachers Student Attendance Rate Parent Teacher Conference Attendance Instructional Staff turnover rate Percent of staff involved in Professional Development Percent of new teachers mentored Years of experience based on date of hire Percent of teachers working under permit

    21. 6/17/2012 21 External Data 2006-07 Elementary District offers school readiness program Middle Schools Percent of students taking Algebra 1 High Schools Graduation and Dropout Rates Advanced Placement and Dual Enrollment Percent Participating Percent Taking and Percent Passing AP exams

    22. 6/17/2012 22 Possible “Extra Credit” Additional Data Collection and Use Surveys of parents, staff, students Peer Review Program Distinction Limit on effect of “Extra Credit” for Grade and Score

    23. 6/17/2012 23 Education YES Plans 2006-07 is a Statewide Pilot 2007-08 Link self-rating and evidence to Action Plan Additional External Data “Extra Credit” Student Progress related to Achievement Status

    24. 6/17/2012 24 Contact Information Paul Bielawski Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education PO Box 30008 Lansing, MI 48909 (517) 335-5784 bielawp@michigan.gov

More Related