1 / 13

Unicode Oddity

Unicode Oddity. from a Unicode PeopleSoft Database. SELECT emplid, name, LENGTH(name), BLENGTH(name) FROM ps_personal_data WHERE emplid = '007’ ; EMPLID NAME LENGTH(NAME) BLENGTH(NAME) ------------- ---------- ------------ -------------

adria-jefferson
Télécharger la présentation

Unicode Oddity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Unicode Oddity

  2. from a Unicode PeopleSoft Database SELECT emplid, name, LENGTH(name), BLENGTH(name) FROM ps_personal_data WHERE emplid = '007’ ; EMPLID NAME LENGTH(NAME) BLENGTH(NAME) ------------- ---------- ------------ ------------- 007 Cona¿ová,d 10 12

  3. Insert 10 characters in 11 bytes CREATE TABLE fred (fred10 VARCHAR2(11)); Table created. INSERT INTO fred SELECT name FROM ps_personal_data WHERE emplid = '007'; ERROR at line 1: ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column

  4. Insert 10 characters in 12 bytes CREATE TABLE fred (fred10 VARCHAR2(12)); Table created. INSERT INTO fred SELECT name FROM ps_personal_data WHERE emplid = '007'; 1 row created.

  5. How does PeopleSoft create tables? CREATE TABLE fred (fred10 VARCHAR2(30) CHECK (LENGTH(fred10)<=10) ); Table created.

  6. So... • Length checking constraint on EVERY character column in the database! • >500,000 user constraints • What effect does this have on performance

  7. create table test_nocons (id number ,field_01 varchar2(30) … ,field_20 varchar2(30) ); create table test_cons (id number ,field_01 varchar2(30) CHECK(LENGTH(field_01)<=30) … ,field_20 varchar2(30) CHECK(LENGTH(field_01)<=30) ); Experiment 1

  8. Populate tables, trace enabled alter session set sql_trace = true; BEGIN FOR i IN 1..10000 LOOP INSERT INTO test_nocons VALUES (i ,RPAD(TO_CHAR(i),11,'.') … ,RPAD(TO_CHAR(i),30,'.') ); COMMIT; END LOOP; END; /

  9. Results of Experiment 1 • Insert 10000 rows • CPU time for recursive SQL • on my 500Mhz Laptop • No constraints: 11.08s • With constraints 13.23s

  10. Experiment 2 • Now deliberately generate different SQL statements, forcing parse every time. BEGIN FOR i IN 1..1000 LOOP EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'INSERT INTO test_nocons VALUES ('||i||',RPAD(TO_CHAR('||i||'),11,''.''))'; END LOOP; COMMIT; END; /

  11. Results of Experiment 2 • >99% parse time • Duration of parse CPU • Without Constraints: 41.05s • With Constraints: 156.93s

  12. Conclusion • Execution of constraints adds overhead. • On my PC 15%-20% increase in CPU consumption. • If you have much SQL parsing this will aggravate the problem. In my case 4 times worse.

  13. Unicode Oddity David Kurtz Go-Faster Consultancy Ltd. david.kurtz@go-faster.co.uk www.go-faster.co.uk

More Related