1 / 36

LHCb results

LHCb results. (New Physics Search at LHCb ). Bolek Pietrzyk LAPP, Annecy, IN2P3, CNRS. SUSY 2011 August 28 – September 02, Fermilab. Flavour Physics is Important. Many of open questions in Standard Model (SM) found in flavour sector - Why are there 3 generations

afia
Télécharger la présentation

LHCb results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LHCb results (New Physics Search at LHCb) Bolek Pietrzyk LAPP, Annecy, IN2P3, CNRS SUSY 2011 August 28 – September 02, Fermilab

  2. Flavour Physics is Important Many of open questions in Standard Model (SM) found in flavour sector - Why are there 3 generations - What determines the extreme hierarchy of fermion masses? - What determines the elements of the CKM matrix? - What is the origin of CP violation (CPV)? Progress in flavour physics may help understand open questions in cosmology - SM CPV insufficient to explain matter/antimatter asymmetry , LHCb results

  3. Flavour Physics is Important Flavour physics is a proven tool of discovery: - Kaon mixing, BR(K0L→μμ) & GIM→ prediction of charm - CP violation → need for a third generation - B mixing → mass of top is very heavy - SUSY parameter space already severely constrained by e.g. b→sγ Precise studies of flavour observables are an excellent way to look for New Physics! , LHCb results

  4. LHCb Essentials CMS and LHCb are complementary , LHCb results

  5. LHCb Essentials LHCb is optimised for flavour physics. # Dedicated heavy flavour trigger - L0: hardware trigger firing on high pt hadrons and muons(~few GeV/c) - HLT: software trigger exploiting, in particular, tracking and vertexing, outputs at 3 kHz → Efficient for hadronic B and D decays, as well as leptonic channels #Very precise vertexing - VELO (planes of forward silicon) approach to within 8mm of beam #Hadron identification - Two RICHes provide good π/K separation over 2 < p < 100 GeV/c #LHCb design luminosity << maximum design luminosity of machine - LHCb already operating at (above!) design luminosity (2x1032cm-2 s-1) , LHCb results

  6. LHCb data taking LHCb collected 37 pb-1 in 2010, and so far 690 pb-1 in 2011, expect about 1 fb-1 by the end of 2011. 2011 analyses presented today use ~330 pb-1 Luminosity levelling delivers ~constant operation at 3-3.5x1032cm-2s-1 ATLAS & CMS lumi falls . off exponentially Lumi of LHCb ‘levelled’ continually , LHCb results

  7. The golden mode: Bs→μμ BR(Bs→μμ)SM = (3.2 ± 0.2) x 10-9 [A.J.Buras, arXiv:1012.1447] - Very high sensitivity to NP, eg. MSSM: - One example [O. Buchmuller et al, arXiv:0907.5568; F. Mahmoudi, arXiv: 08083144; B.C. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305-331] , LHCb results

  8. Bs→μμ : experimental context # BR Upper Limit 95% CL as of Spring 2011: - CDF (3.7 fb-1): < 4.3 x 10-8 - D0 (6.1 fb-1): < 5.1 x 10-8 - LHCb (37 pb-1): < 5.6 x 10-8 (2010 data) # Recent exciting hint from CDF (7 fb-1): - BR = 1.8+1.1-0.9 x 10-8 [arXiv:1107.2304] , LHCb results

  9. 2011 Bs→μ+μ- search with LHCb • # Strategy very similar to 2010 analysis [PLB 699 (2011) 330] • After di-μ preselection: • Build Boosted Decision Tree out of • 9 kinematical and topological variables • -Train BDT on MC, but calibrate on data: • & signal response: use B → hh decays • triggered on ‘other B’ (avoid biases!) • & background response: use sidebands , LHCb results

  10. 2011 Bs→μ+μ- search with LHCb • Invariant mass of expected signal • parameterised as crystal ball, with scale • & resolution (~25 MeV) calibrated from • data (dimuon resonances & B → hh) • Now look in a 6 x 4 grid of μ+μ- invariant • mass vs BDT output • To obtain relative BR for signal use three normalisation channels: • B+ → J/ΨK+, Bs → J/Ψφ and B0 → Kπ • – all give consistent results , LHCb results

  11. 2011 Bs→μ+μ- search with LHCb Data Combinatorial background B → hh misid background 0.1±0.1 events in each of 4 BDT bins Signal with SM BR , LHCb results

  12. 2011 Bs→μ+μ- search with LHCb Mmm=5.357 GeV, B mom. 58.16 GeV, transverse mom. 3.5 GeV, lifetime 3.52 ps, flighting pass 1.15 cm , LHCb results

  13. Bs→μ+μ- LHCb preliminary limit Compute limits using frequentist CLs method and LHCb combined result for fs/fd = 3.745 +-0.295 LHCb-CONF-2011-034 BackgdonlyBackgd + SM signal Expected limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.0 (0.8) x 10-8 1.5 (1.2) x 10-8 Observed limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.6 (1.3) x 10-8 p-value of bckgdonlyhypothesis 14% Observed limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.5 (1.2) x 10-8 (5 – 4 x SM) when combined with 2010 result , LHCb results

  14. B0→K*l+l- Many observables exist in B0→K*l+l- to probe helicity structure of any New Physics... ...in particular, forward-backward asymmetry (AFB) of lepton system as a function of lepton invariant mass (q2). , LHCb results

  15. B0→K*l+l-: experimental context Results from CDF & B-factories show intriguing behaviour at low q2 : C7=‐C7SM SM , LHCb results

  16. B0→K*μ+μ-: event selection Select events using Boosted Decision Tree from sample of 309 pb-1 Veto decays in J/Ψ and Ψ(2S) resonance regions 303 signal events after mass cut Measure in 6 q2 bins: Simultaneous fit of 1D projections of helicity angles of kaon & lepton •differential branching fraction, dΓ/dq2 } Performance of fit validated on MC and B0→J/ΨK* decays •longitudinal polarisation, FL •AFB , LHCb results

  17. AFB in B0→K*μ+μ- Systematic uncertainties are small, and generally statistics limited. C. Bobeth et al. [arXiv:1105.0376v2] LHCb-CONF-2011-039 Data are consistent with the SM predictions at present sensitivity and indicate for the first time that the asymmetry is changing sign as predicted by the SM. , LHCb results

  18. AFB in B0→K*μ+μ- arXiv:1108.0695 , LHCb results

  19. CP-violation in Bs mixing Interference between mixing and decay gives rise to CP violating phase 𝜙𝑠=𝜙𝑀 −2 𝜙𝐷 final state is mixture of CP even and CP odd eigenstates (P—VV decay) Described by three polarization amplitudes: 𝐴⊥ (CP-odd) 𝐴0 ,𝐴∥ (CP-even) Final states described by three angles: Ω={𝜑,𝜃,𝜓} 𝜙𝐷 [SM −0.0363 ± 0.0017 rad] 𝐵𝑠 𝐽/Ψ Φ −𝜙𝐷 𝜙𝑀 𝐵𝑠 , LHCb results

  20. 𝜙𝑠: experimental context 𝜙𝑠=𝜙𝑀 −2 𝜙𝐷 SM prediction: −0.0363 ± 0.0017 rad [CKMfitter, Eur. Phys. J. C41 (2005)] D0 / EPS 2011 Conference / S.Burdin CDF Public Note 10206 LHCb measurement with 2010 data: 757 ± 28 signal candidates , LHCb results

  21. Bs→ J/yf m J/y L = 337 pb-1 8276 ± 94 signal candidates (10x more than in 2010) S/B ~ 11 in 3𝜎 mass window Perform unbinned maximum likelihood fit in mass, proper time, transversity angles OS tagger optimized and calibrated on 2011 data using 𝐵+→ 𝐽/Ψ 𝐾+, 𝐵0 → 𝐽/Ψ 𝐾∗ and 𝐵0→ 𝐷∗-𝜇+𝜈𝜇 𝜖𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑓2 = 2.08 ± 0.17 ± 0.37% m- Bs f K K , LHCb results

  22. Bs→ J/yf Systematic uncertainties are small, and generally statistics limited. LHCb-CONF-2011-049 Standard Model [𝜙𝑠 CKMfitter, Eur. Phys. J. C41 (2005)] (ΔΓ𝑠 Lenz, Nierste, JHEP 0706 (2007) 072) 𝜙𝑠 = 0.13 ± 0.18 (𝑠𝑡𝑎) ± 0.07 (𝑠𝑦𝑠) rad ΔΓ𝑠 = 0.123 ± 0.029 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡) ± 0.008 (𝑠𝑦𝑠) 𝑝𝑠-1 Γ𝑠 = 0.656 ± 0.009 (𝑠𝑡𝑎) ± 0.008 (𝑠𝑦𝑠) 𝑝𝑠-1 , LHCb results

  23. Bs→ J/yf This is NOT an official accurate overlay!! – only an “artist’s view” , LHCb results

  24. Bs→ J/yf0(980) Feb. 1, 2011 – LHCb: “1st observation of Bs→ J/ψ f0(980) decays“ [arXiv:1102.0206] f0 is a scalar with an ss component but decays predominatly into π+π- , LHCb results

  25. Bs→ J/yf0(980) Bs→J/ψππ • 2011 data • Nsig = 1428 ± 47 events • 365 ± 22 after tagging • εD2 = 2.13% • The f0(980) signal region • looks pure scalar • purely CP odd • no angular analysis • required B0→J/ψKπ B0→J/ψππ Bs→J/ψ η’,φ B+→J/ψπ , LHCb results

  26. Bs→ J/yf0(980) LHCb-CONF-2011-051 • ϕs = -0.44 ± 0.44(stat.) ± 0.02(syst.) , LHCb results

  27. J/yf and J/yf0(980) combination 𝜙𝑠 = 0.13 ± 0.18 (𝑠𝑡𝑎) ± 0.07 (𝑠𝑦𝑠) rad ϕs = -0.44 ± 0.44(stat.) ± 0.02(syst.) pleriminary simple combination Φs = 0.03 ± 0.16(stat) ± 0.07(syst) rad SM Φs = −0.036 ± 0.002 LHCb-CONF-2011-056 , LHCb results

  28. Δms: experimental context • # CDF (2006): • - Δ𝑚𝑠 = 17.77 ± 0.10 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡) ± 0.07 (𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡) • 5,600 fully and 3,100 partially reconstructed • hadronic 𝐵𝑠0, 61,500 semileptonic 𝐵𝑠0 • - s𝑡 = 87 fs (fully rec. hadr.) • - 𝜀𝐷2 = 3.7 % (hadr., OST+SST) • # LHCb (2010): • - Δ𝑚𝑠 = 17.63 ± 0.11 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡) ± 0.03 (𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡) • - 1381 signal candidates • - s𝑡 = 44 fs • - 𝜀𝐷2 = (3.8 ± 2.8) % (OST only) , LHCb results

  29. Δms: LHCb 2011 data # LHCb, 2011 data 341 pb-1 Δ𝑚𝑠 = 17.725 ± 0.041 (𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡) ± 0.025 (𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡) - 9189 signal candidates - 𝜀𝐷2 = (3.2 ± 08) % (OST) - 𝜀𝐷2 = (1.2 ± 04) % (SST) , LHCb results

  30. CP violation … is easy B0 B0 B0S B0S , LHCb results

  31. Summary • - LHCb at LHC is making precise measurements • - Hints for strong signs of NP from other experiments are not confirmed • - LHCb results presented here are in agreement with the SM prediction, but … • -There is still a lot of room for NP • - At the end of 2011 we should have about 3 times more data and improved analyses • Excellent prospects for excellent results • at Moriond 2012 , LHCb results

  32. Backup slides

  33. Bs→μ+μ- CMS search (1.14 fb-1 ) # No significant excess seen Barrel Endcap B→hh # Compute limits using frequentist CLs method and PDG fs/fd = 0.282 ±0.037 Expected limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.8 x 10-8 (including SM signal) Observed limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.9 (1.6) x 10-8 , LHCb results

  34. Bs→μ+μ- combination A preliminary CMS-LHCb combination on BR(Bs→μ+μ-) has been performed, using the CLs approach, & taking LHCb value of fs/fd as common input Observed limit at 95% (90%) C.L. 1.1 (0.9) x 10-8 3.4 times the expected SM value CMS + LHCb preliminary CDF hint is not confirmed , LHCb results

  35. Like-sign di-muon asymmetry D0 observes 3 s deviation from the SM LHC is a pp-collider, not a ppbar-collider , LHCb results

  36. LHCb detector , LHCb results

More Related