1 / 10

The Cosmological Arguments

The Cosmological Arguments. What The CA Does. Arguments do not [necessarily] point to God Argues for: An extremely powerful being A spaceless being A [at least one point] timeless being An immaterial being A personal being The argument works best in supplementation.

afric
Télécharger la présentation

The Cosmological Arguments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Cosmological Arguments

  2. What The CA Does • Arguments do not [necessarily] point to God • Argues for: • An extremely powerful being • A spaceless being • A [at least one point] timeless being • An immaterial being • A personal being • The argument works best in supplementation

  3. Leibnizian Cosmological Argument • Gottfied Wilhem Leibniz, “Why is there something rather than nothing?” • Anything that exists has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external cause. • If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God. • The universe exists. • Therefore the universe has an explanation of its existence. (from 1, 3) • Therefore, the explanation of the existence of the universe is God. (from 2, 4)

  4. Argument From Contingency • Impossibility of an infinite regress of simultaneously operating causes. • What we observe in this universe is contingent. • A sequence of causally related contingent things cannot be infinite. • The sequence of causally dependent contingent things must be finite. • There must be a first cause in the sequence of contingent causes.

  5. Kalam Cosmological Argument • Al Ghazali • Whatever begins to exist has a cause. • The universe began to exist. • Therefore, the universe had a cause.

  6. Kalam Cosmological Argument • Whatever begins to exist has a cause. • “The most reasonable belief is that we came from nothing, by nothing, and for nothing.” -Quentin Smith • Quentin Smith, Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology (Oxford: Clarendon, 1993), 135.

  7. Kalam Cosmological Argument • Is a chronological actual infinite possible?

  8. Kalam Cosmological Argument • Has our understanding of quantum mechanics made a universe from [literally] nothing possible?

  9. Kalam Cosmological Argument • Al Ghazali • Whatever begins to exist has a cause. • The universe began to exist. • Therefore, the universe had a cause.

  10. Conclusion • Leibniz argues for a Sufficient Reason (what we call God) • Aquinas argues for a First Mover and Cause • Al Ghazali argues for a temporal causal relationship • An extremely powerful being • A spaceless being • A [at least one point] timeless being • An immaterial being • A personal being

More Related