1 / 22

Association of Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Cardiovascular Events

Association of Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Cardiovascular Events. Presenter: WEN- Ching Lan Date: 2019/02/27. Thomas T. van Sloten , MD, PhD; Muriel Tafflet , MSc; Marie-Cecile Perier , MSc; Aline Dugravot , PhD ;

africa
Télécharger la présentation

Association of Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Cardiovascular Events

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Association of Change in Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Cardiovascular Events Presenter: WEN-ChingLan Date: 2019/02/27 Thomas T. van Sloten, MD, PhD; Muriel Tafflet, MSc; Marie-Cecile Perier, MSc; Aline Dugravot, PhD; Rachel E. D. Climie, PhD; ArchanaSingh-Manoux, PhD; Jean-Philippe Empana, MD, PhD JAMA of 2018

  2. Introduction • The AmericanHeartAssociation (AHA) developed a simple 7-item tool consistingof 4 behavioral metrics and 3 biological metricsfor promoting ideal cardiovascularhealth. • Single assessmentof cardiovascular health 1

  3. AIM • To quantify the association of time-varying cardiovascular health during follow-up with incident CVD events, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality; • To describe change in cardiovascular health over 10 years; • To quantify the association of change in cardiovascular health with subsequent incident CVD and mortality. 2

  4. Methods • Participants • The Whitehall II study is an ongoing prospective cohort study originally employed by the British civil service in Londonbased offices. • A total of 10 308 participants were recruited between 1985 and 1988. • self-administrated questionnaires were completed approximately every 5 years 3

  5. Methods • Cardiovascular Health Metrics and Status • The AHA criteria were used to define the 7 metrics of cardiovascularhealth at allwaves. • Change in cardiovascular health was examined between 1985/1988 and 1997/1999 in participants having the 7 metrics at both time points. • All participants were required to be free of CVD event between 1985/1988 and 1997/1999 examinations. 4

  6. Methods • Covariates • Sociodemographic variables included age, sex, race/ethnicity,marital status,socioeconomic status,education, • Depressive symptomswere • Family history(myocardial infarction or stroke) 5

  7. 6

  8. Methods • Outcomes • The primary outcome was incident CVD (coronary heart diseaseand stroke combined. • The secondary outcome wasmortality. • CVD follow-up was until March 31, 2017, and mortalityfollow-up was until August 31, 2017. 7

  9. Methods • CVD Electrocardiogram recording, self-reported coronary heart disease, Hospital Episodes Statistics database [ICD-9codes]410-414, [ICD-10codes] I20-I25, or [ICD-10procedures]K40-K49, K50, K75, U19 • Stroke Augsburg stroke questionnaires [ICD-9 codes] 430, 431, 434, 436 and [ICD-10 codes] I60-I64 • Mortality linkage to the British National MortalityRegister 8

  10. Methods • StatisticalAnalysis • Time-VaryingAnalysis • Competingrisk analysis • Kaplan-Meier curves • post hoc analyses 9

  11. Methods • Sensitivity Analyses • The Framingham Offspring Study • using the 14-point cardiovascular health score (Consistentlyhigh (≥8 to ≥8), high to low (≥8 to ≤7), low to high (≤7 to ≥8),consistently low(≤7 to ≤7).) • Cox regression • missing cardiovascular health metrics and covariates were imputed by multiple imputation. 10 http://www.hksports.net/hkpe/sports_medicine/framingham_heart_study.htm

  12. Results 11

  13. Results 12

  14. Results 13

  15. Results Values indicate the percentage of participants in that cardiovascular health category, and colors indicate rate per 1000 person-years. Median follow-up after1997/1999 was 18.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 17.8-19.3) years for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 19.7 (IQR, 18.9-19.8) years for mortality. Heatmaps of unadjustedincidence rates of CVD and all-cause mortality for change in the number of ideal health metrics are in eFigure 6. 14

  16. Results 15

  17. The follow-up of cardiovasculardisease (CVD) and mortality startedafter 1997/1999, ie, 10 years after thebaseline cardiovascular healthexamination. All individuals with aCVD event within 10 years after thebaseline cardiovascular healthexamination were excluded from thisanalysis. The median duration offollow-up was 18.9 (interquartilerange [IQR],17.8 to 19.3) years for CVDand 19.7 (IQR, 18.9 to 19.8) years formortality. The low to high group(n = 19) is not reported as only 1 CVDevent and 2 deaths occurred duringfollow-up. Curves are ordered fromhighest to lowest risk for incidentCVD and all-cause mortality. 16

  18. Results 17

  19. Results 18

  20. Limitations • The observational design precludes reaching causal conclusions about the findings. • Individuals excluded from the analysis of change in cardiovascular health hadaless favorable cardiovascular risk profile • Some categories of cardiovascular health change were small in size. • aging, temporal trends, and cohort attrition • healthy worker effect 19

  21. Conclusions • There was no consistent relationship between direction of change in category of a composite metric of cardiovascular health and risk of CVD. 20

  22. Thanks for listening.

More Related