1 / 12

Peer Review

Peer Review. 2013-2014. “Quality teaching is not an individual accomplishment, it is the result of a collaborative culture that empowers teachers to team up to improve student learning beyond what any one of them can achieve alone.” - Carroll, “The Next Generation of Learning Teams”

aida
Télécharger la présentation

Peer Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peer Review 2013-2014

  2. “Quality teaching is not an individual accomplishment, it is the result of a collaborative culture that empowers teachers to team up to improve student learning beyond what any one of them can achieve alone.” • - Carroll, “The Next Generation of Learning Teams” • Phi Delta Kappan (2009). P. 13 • “The most powerful form of learning, the most sophisticated form of staff development, comes not from listening to the good works of others but from sharing what we know with others… By reflecting on what we know with others…By reflecting on what we do, by giving it coherence, and by sharing and articulating our craft knowledge, we make meaning, we learn.”– Roland Barth

  3. Peer Review

  4. PEER REVIEW TEAM

  5. Collaboration Language What would it look like if… I’ve noticed when you… the students… How do you think the lesson went and why? How did you decide… What did you do to make the lesson so successful? I’m curious to know more about…

  6. Characteristics of Effective Instruction

  7. Research Based If practitioners collaborate in a constructive and meaningful way by: • Focusing on improving teaching and student learning; • Meeting regularly with thoughtfully planned agendas, minutes, and concise follow-up actions; • Planning lessons, practicing lessons, debriefing lessons; organizing, analyzing, and summarizing data to plan instruction; solving problems related to student learning, reading, reflecting, and sharing articles that support learning goals; And • School leaders monitor, support, and participate in the collaborative process to ensure that efforts are focused on student learning and on district and building goals; Then teaching and student learning will improve. Source: Iowa Department of Education www.educateiowa.gov

  8. Research Based Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Harvard Graduate School of Education (n.d). A User’s Guide to Peer Assistance and Review. Cambridge, MA: Author. Goldstein, J. (2004). Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: The Case of Peer Assistance and Review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(2), 173-197 (ERIC Journal Number EJ737147) http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ737147

  9. The intent of Peer Review is not to add one more thing but to embed professional development into what we are already doing. Working in PLC’s we will continue to refine and reflect in a more formal manner with supports in place. As a district, Cedar Rapids continually strives to be leaders in doing what we know is best practice and keeping the focus on impacting student learning.

More Related