1 / 15

Dylan Millet Harvard University with

NOAA C&GC Postdoctoral Fellowship Program. NASA Atmospheric Chemistry Program. New Constraints on Terrestrial and Oceanic Sources of Atmospheric Methanol. Dylan Millet Harvard University with D. Jacob (Harvard), D. Blake (UCI), T. Custer and J. Williams (MPI),

ailis
Télécharger la présentation

Dylan Millet Harvard University with

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NOAA C&GC Postdoctoral Fellowship Program NASA Atmospheric Chemistry Program New Constraints on Terrestrial and Oceanic Sources of Atmospheric Methanol Dylan Millet Harvard University with D. Jacob (Harvard), D. Blake (UCI), T. Custer and J. Williams (MPI), J. de Gouw, C. Warneke, and J. Holloway (NOAA), T. Karl (NCAR), H. Singh (NASA), B. Sive (UNH) Thanks to: American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting 2007

  2. Methanol: The Most Abundant Non-Methane Organic Gas Oxidation by OH Atmospheric Production Source of CO, HCHO, O3 Sink of OH CH3OH Burden: ~4 Tg Lifetime: 5-10 d CH4 Wet Dep Ocean Exchange Dry Dep (Land) Plant Growth Plant Decay Biomass Burning Urban Emissions ?

  3. Aircraft and Surface Measurements Used to Constrain Methanol Sources & Sinks Interpret with: GEOS-Chem 3D model of atmospheric chemistry GEOS-Chem 3D model of atmospheric chemistry New plot with all obs SURFACE OOMPH, NEAQS-2K2, Kinterbish, Tennessee, UMBS, Trinidad Head, Duke Forest, Chebogue Pt, Appledore Isl., Thompson Farm, Rondônia, Amazonas AIRCRAFT PEM-TB, INTEX-A/B, MILAGRO, ITCT-2K2/2K4, TOPSE, LBA/CLAIRE, TROFFEE, TEXAQS-II

  4. Methanol: The Most Abundant Non-Methane Organic Gas Oxidation by OH Atmospheric Production CH3OH Burden: ~4 Tg Lifetime: 5-10 d Source of CO, HCHO, O3 CH4 Wet Dep Ocean Exchange Dry Dep (Land) Plant Growth Plant Decay Biomass Burning Urban Emissions

  5. Ocean Mixed Layer (OML): Source + Sink for Atmospheric Methanol Previous work: • · Assume constant OML undersaturation · OML a small net sink • Assumes air-sea exchange controls [CH3OH]OML

  6. Ocean Mixed Layer (OML): Source + Sink for Atmospheric Methanol Recent OML Measurements imply a large methanol reservoir (20× that of the atmosphere)  Short lifetime requires large OML source (~8E3 Tg/y) CH3OH 120 ± 50 nM [Williams et al., 2004] 66 Tg Biotic consumption  ~ 3 d [Heikes et al., 2002]

  7. Ocean Mixed Layer (OML): Source + Sink for Atmospheric Methanol Recent OML Measurements imply a large methanol reservoir (20× that of the atmosphere) OML ventilation weeks-months 100 Tg/y •  Short lifetime requires large OML source (~8E3 Tg/y) • Transfer from atmosphere insufficient to balance loss • Large in-situ biological source implied CH3OH 120 ± 50 nM [Williams et al., 2004] 66 Tg Biotic consumption  ~ 3 d [Heikes et al., 2002] Biological production

  8. Ocean Mixed Layer (OML): Source + Sink for Atmospheric Methanol Recent OML Measurements imply a large methanol reservoir (20× that of the atmosphere) OML ventilation weeks-months 100 Tg/y •  Short lifetime requires large OML source (~8E3 Tg/y) • Transfer from atmosphere insufficient to balance loss • Large in-situ biological source implied • Ocean emission, uptake: independent terms in atmospheric budget CH3OH 120 ± 50 nM [Williams et al., 2004] 66 Tg Biotic consumption  ~ 3 d [Heikes et al., 2002] Biological production

  9. Ocean Emission and Uptake of Atmospheric Methanol Calculate ocean source & sink terms independently · On basis of measured OML concentrations Ocean Emission Ocean Uptake  =11 d 100 Tg y-1 85 Tg y-1  Marine biosphere: large source of atmospheric methanol  Comparable to terrestrial biota  Comparable to oxidation by OH Net Flux

  10. New Air-Sea Flux Parameterization Generally Consistent with Atmospheric Observations Measured vs. modeled methanol concentrations over the S. Atlantic OOMPH 2007 Methanol profiles over the Pacific Measured Modeled

  11. Methanol Emissions from the Terrestrial Biosphere All plants make methanol · Produced during cell growth · Emitted from leaves ~ f(T, hν) · E = 0.11% × NPP [Galbally & Kirstine, 2002] Aircraft Measurements Reveal Overestimate of Plant Growth Source Vertical Profiles over N. America Simulated summer methanol concentrations in surface air [ppb] Broad-scale inflow to W. US well simulated Measured Modeled • 2× BL overestimate during summer Only explained by overestimate of plant growth source

  12. Bias Correlates Spatially with Regions of High Broadleaf Tree & Crop Coverage Modeled - Measured Modeled Observed Boundary Layer Methanol Concentrations [ppb] • Removal of bias requires: • 4x reduction of broadleaf tree + crop emissions, or • 2x reduction of emissions from all terrestrial plants MDVD2 vegetation coverage[Guenther et al., 2006]

  13. Reduced Biogenic Source Yields Better Agreement over North America and Tropical South America Vertical Profiles over N. America Amazon Boundary Layer Measured Base case  2× (all plants)  4× (bdlf trees + crops) • Both optimizations of comparable quality • Best estimate of global terrestrial biogenic source: 80 Tg/y (vs. 145 Tg/y base case) • 2× all plants • 4× bdlf trees, crops Base case Measured

  14. Importance of Biogenic vs. Anthropogenic Sources Methanol strongly correlated with CO despite lack of large anthro. source Aircraft measurements over N. America during summer Model captures correlation, slope (with independent constraints on CO) Measured Base case  2× (all plants)  4× (bdlf trees + crops)

  15. Updated Global Budget of Atmospheric Methanol Sources Sinks 80 Tg/y 88 Tg/y 85 Tg/y 101 Tg/y 37 Tg/y 23 Tg/y 40 Tg/y 13 Tg/y Atmospheric lifetime: 4.7 days 12 Tg/y 5 Tg/y 108 molec/cm2/s 108 molec/cm2/s

More Related