1 / 8

Presentation to Community Reference Group Thursday 7 February 2013

Presentation to Community Reference Group Thursday 7 February 2013 Patterson Lakes Community Centre. Introduction. 2. Welcome Purpose of this Presentation Structure for meeting. PLIR Terms of Reference Part 1. 3. The Review is expected to deliver the following outcomes:

aine
Télécharger la présentation

Presentation to Community Reference Group Thursday 7 February 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation to Community Reference Group Thursday 7 February 2013 Patterson Lakes Community Centre

  2. Introduction 2 • Welcome • Purpose of this Presentation • Structure for meeting

  3. PLIR Terms of Reference Part 1 3 • The Review is expected to deliver the following outcomes: • An outcomes-based and accountable management framework • Economic, environmental and socially sustainable management arrangements; and • Clearly documented and agreed levels of service that meet residents‘ expectations under a sustainable funding arrangement where costs of delivering the recreational and drainage services are recovered.

  4. PLIR Terms of Reference Part 2 4 • Review relevant historical agreements and their legal status today; • Review and identify what assets and services should be the sole responsibility of the Precept Rate Payers; • Review and identify what percentage of the proposed capital renewal should be the responsibility of Precept Rate Payers; • Clarify what regional services Patterson Lakes Residents receive from Melbourne Waterʼs General Drainage Charge; • Clarify the services Patterson Lakes Residents receive from Kingston City Council rates; • Explore the most effective delivery method to provide value for money services to Patterson Lakes Tidal Waterways and Quiet Lakes Precept rate payers and the broader community; and • Seek expert industry advice on the management of constructed lakes systems and related funding / pricing approaches to inform the recommendations.

  5. Review process to date 5 • PLIR Members first appointed on 11 September 2012 • Issues Paper prepared in October 2012 distributed to stakeholder and residents in Patterson Lakes • Submission Period November 2012 • 52 written submissions received • Public Hearings 11 and 12 December 2012 • 11 parties made verbal submissions representing over 600 stakeholders • Community Reference Group: • 3 meetings • 13 members

  6. The 2 Key Issues 6 • The 1973 Agreement • Outdated and overtaken by events • Needs replacement • Range of implementation options • Characterization of lakes and waterways • Private or public infrastructure? • Drainage or recreational function?

  7. Approach to issues 7 Characterization of lakes and waterways Levels of service (current and future) Funding sources Role of Authorities Options for Implementation

  8. Where to Next 8 • Written responses to this presentation from CRG members by 5pm Thursday 14 February, 2013 • Site Inspections this afternoon by PLIR members • Report due 1 March 2013, 2013 • Option for presentation of key findings to CRG week of 4 March 2013 • Report will not be the end of process for stakeholders

More Related