1 / 12

Education snapshot of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW

Education snapshot of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW. Lo-Shu Wen Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies ACWA Conference 2010. Background. Initiated through ACWA’s OOHC Forum Poor educational outcomes for children and young people in out of home care.

aitana
Télécharger la présentation

Education snapshot of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Education snapshot of children and young people in out-of-home care in NSW Lo-Shu Wen Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies ACWA Conference 2010

  2. Background • Initiated through ACWA’s OOHC Forum • Poor educational outcomes for children and young people in out of home care. • Need for more data on how children and young people in out of home care are performing in school. • Development of questionnaire to be used to capture a snapshot.

  3. Research Process • Questionnaire sent to non-government agencies providing OOHC. • To be completed by caseworker, carer or similar. • No identifying information recorded. • Sent at the end of Term 3. First conducted in 2008 and then in 2009.

  4. Out-of-Home Care in NSW • 34,069 children and young people in OOHC in Australia (AIHW, 2010). • 16,524 children and young people in care in NSW (Community Services, 2009). • In NSW, residential care wholly provided by NGOs. Foster care divided between Community Services and NGOs. • 78.2% Community Services, 21.8% NGOs – 1,921 children and young people (Wood Report, 2008).

  5. Profile of the Sample

  6. Key Findings – Changes in School Change school at least once whilst in placement Top reasons: • Placement change • Child’s decision • Expulsion • Needs of the child

  7. Key Findings – School Attendance

  8. Key Findings – NAPLAN testing Example of NAPLAN reporting Child’s Mark National Average School Average NAPLAN Band

  9. Key Findings – NAPLAN testing • Efficacy of NAPLAN results as basis of measurement for kids in OOHC. • Small sample that provided NAPLAN results. • Potential reasons for lack of reporting on NAPLAN. • School practices in relation to NAPLAN testing. • Inconclusive. Combining Year Groups NAPLAN Results

  10. Further Work • Completion of reports for 2009 survey and cross analysis of 2008 and 2009. • Due to conduct the survey again in September 2010. • Focus efforts at increasing reporting of NAPLAN test results. • Potential impacts of new policies • Increase of compulsory school age to 17 • Keep Them Safe reforms • Education OOHC Coordinators • Education Learning Plans

  11. Acknowledgements • Education Research Working Party • Boys Town Engadine • CREATE Foundation • Foster Parents Support Network • Life Without Barriers • Marist Youth Care • PhD Student, Southern Cross University • UnitingCare Burnside • Wesley Dalmar • Pamela Peters, social work student placement, UNSW

  12. Contact Lo-Shu Wen, Policy Officer Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies (02) 9281 8822 loshu@acwa.asn.au http://www.acwa.asn.au

More Related