Optimization of Traditional Part Inspection: Best-Fit Strategies for Door Alignment
Explore the nuances of traditional part inspection, focusing on datum alignment and best-fit methodologies. Address critical scenarios such as dealing with non-scrapable parts and optimizing the use of available tolerances. This guide covers essential relationships between points and features, providing practical insight into achieving precise alignments. Learn how the best-fit functional surfaces can ensure successful assembly and alignment in real-world situations, particularly in door fitting. Gain valuable understanding of measurement relationships to improve your inspection processes.
Optimization of Traditional Part Inspection: Best-Fit Strategies for Door Alignment
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Traditional Datum Alignment & Go / No-Go Nominal Measured
Traditional Datum Alignment & Go / No-Go • What if we can’t scrap? • What if we could use ALL available tolerance? • Could it pass? OR Could I find the minimal amount or rework?
Relationships • Points to Features • Points to Surfaces • Points to Points • Features to Features • Etc.
BEST-FIT FUNCTIONAL SURFACES THESE WILL DOMINATE FIXED PART TO BE ASSEMBLED (ALIGNED) 14 POINTS 31 POINTS
FITTING THE DOOR: “THE REAL LIFE” Door Axis Hinge Door Floor
FITTING THE DOOR: “THE REAL LIFE” Measured point Hinge GroupHinge Object1 Group1 Group2 Object2 Object3 Group3
FITTING THE DOOR: “THE REAL LIFE” These points willdominate REGULAR BEST-FIT