Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Verena Roberts, Ph.D. Integrated Care Psychologist Elizabeth Lowdermilk, M.D., Psychiatrist PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Verena Roberts, Ph.D. Integrated Care Psychologist Elizabeth Lowdermilk, M.D., Psychiatrist

Verena Roberts, Ph.D. Integrated Care Psychologist Elizabeth Lowdermilk, M.D., Psychiatrist

89 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Verena Roberts, Ph.D. Integrated Care Psychologist Elizabeth Lowdermilk, M.D., Psychiatrist

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Session #B2b Friday, October 11, 2013 Navigating the Clinical Barriers in the Management of Severely and Persistently Mentally Ill Patients Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 15th Annual Conference October 10-12, 2013 Broomfield, Colorado U.S.A. Verena Roberts, Ph.D. Integrated Care Psychologist Elizabeth Lowdermilk, M.D., Psychiatrist Elaine Hess, Ph.D., Post-Doctoral Fellow

  2. Faculty Disclosure We have not had any relevant financial relationships during the past 12 months.

  3. Objectives • 1) Attendees will learn about the current state of integrated care at Denver Health, an FQHC • 2) Attendees will identify and learn about barriers to successful integrated care, including the treatment of the severely and persistently mentally ill patients • 3) Attendees will be able to form ideas and develop a framework around how to enhance collaborative patient care and move current integrated behavioral health approaches to the next level • 4) Attendees will leave with concrete ideas beyond the basic model on how to integrate specific practice options at their own site

  4. Learning Assessment Audience Question & Answer We will provide time for questions and in depth-discussion at the end of the session, but please feel free to ask some questions as they come up.

  5. DH intro Denver Health – Overview CHS

  6. Clinic make up • Eastside Clinic is a federally qualified community health center which provides services for low income patients in central Denver. • Services include: • Primary care/medical • Integrated BH • Integrated pharmacy services • Navigators – self-management goal setting and f/u / in-between care services

  7. Clinic make up cont’d • The patients seen: • low income (97% are <200% of the federal poverty level), uninsured or on public insurance (25% Medicare, 32% Medicaid, 32% CICP, 8% DFAP) • are mostly under-represented racial/ethnic minorities (41% African American, 34% Hispanic/Latino)

  8. Managing SPMI patients – current status at Denver Health Basic model (How we started) • BHC (FT Psychologist and PT psych. Student) • 2 scheduled 30 min. behavioral health appointments per session (for further evals, tx) • Allows for overbooks for pt. with high follow-up needs • Scheduled and unscheduled (warm-handoffs) integrated visits with PCPs • Identifying patients: • By PCPs during visits • BHCs would also scan provider schedules and discuss possible same-day referrals in mini huddles with PCP • PT Psychiatrist & PT psychiatry resident • 1 pm session a week in clinic • 3-4 40 min. scheduled appointments (3 + 1 OVBK) • E-mail/phone consults about patients - ongoing

  9. Managing SPMI patients – current status at Denver Health – cont’d • Clarification of Roles: BHC vs. Psychiatrist • Dx clarification • Appropriately triage/refer or f/u with “high-risk” patients • some case management as related to managing such patients (incl. 3 calls and a letter if pts no-show for f/u) • Treatment (4-6 sessions ideally max.) • Delegation of services for higher level care to: • Psychiatry • Linked to psychiatrist via e-mail or appt. (1-3 visits) • Routine or Crisis evals • Ability to overbook urgent med evals (1 per week) • Urgent phone calls/pager for instant med changes/start via psychiatyr consult and PCP (who starts med) • Linkage to outside tx – referral heavy

  10. Managing SPMI patients – current status at Denver Health – cont’d • Summary of key points of basic model at Denver Health • utilizing a step-wise approach • BHC acts as “gate keeper” to psychiatry as well as has ability to “instantly” connect patient with psychiatry to initiate med changes, etc. • Model heavily relied on: • Provider referrals to BH • fact that patients ideally have an outside specialty network of BH services available to them • in case of need for intensive counseling • continued medication management • ongoing crises.

  11. Identified difficulties in the management of SPMI to date • SPMI/unable or unwilling to go to specialty MH for variety of reasons as simple as • vicinity/location, transportation issues, mistrust of MH • Chaotic lives • Multiple ongoing crises • PHQ-9/GAD-7 tracking/general screening • may never show improved scores because of ongoing situational stressors

  12. Identified difficulties in the management ofSPMI to date (cont’d) • Other Issues: • Safety (lack of time for f/u or no timely f/u with specialty MH due to month long waiting lists or cumbersome appointment access) • Psychosis (lack of insight) • High substance use issues • Basic needs: housing, food security • Questions raised: • How do we ensure continuation of care? • Who tracks high risk patients in terms of f/u outside of system? • Or return visits in our system? • Original model calls for BHCs not to have a case load. How does managing such patients fit with this or not?

  13. Identified difficulties in the managementof SPMI to date (cont.’d) • What is lacking in the current/basic model: • care coordination in general • coordination with probation officers • more frequent visits if needed • time for phone calls, education re: case conceptualization w/ PCP • drop in patients who urgently present to clinic (but are not “hospitalizable”) and need psych med adjustments or urgent intervention • System problems • Little MHCD access • % Eastside patients seen by BHC • 32% CICP, 32% Medicaid, 25% Medicare, 8% DFAP, 3% Other • ES has 7027 pts., BHC saw/ had involvement with 595 unique pts (8.5% of total)

  14. Identified difficulties in the management of SPMI to date • No MH access on CICP • Patients “kicked” out of specialty care for non-adherence or threats • Low staff to high patient ratio • Cannot see patients 1x week • We see 1x month at most (occasionally with ICVs 2x)

  15. Lessons from Other Systems • Management of SPMI in other integrated behavioral health systems: • Access Community Health Center (Madison, WI) • St. Charles Health System (Oregon) • Cherokee Health Systems (Tennessee) • IMPACT Model Khatri, Perry & Wallace (2008) Unützer et al (2001) Personal communication, Robin Henderson, PsyD, St. Charles Health System Personal communication, Neftali Serrano PsyD & Meghan Fondow, PhD, Access Community Health Centers

  16. Challenges in Other • Already over-taxed primary care providers struggle to manage SPMI on their panels • Specialty systems are either limited or non-existent • For un- or under-insured • Inability to bill mental health codes in community health • Too few prescribers specializing in psychiatry

  17. Creative Solutions from Other Systems • Stepped care approach • Disease management • IMPACT: emphasizes depression • E.g., any new anti-depressant starts • Utilize a care manager • Preferably with mental health background • Risk stratify care • Targeted interventions

  18. Creative Solutions from Other • Mental health day treatment program • Include on-site primary care services 1-2 days/week • Complex treatment team meetings • Troubleshoot barriers for complex patients • Process improvement • Telehealth for integrated psychiatrist • Flexible access crucial for those in crisis • In-house 340B pharmacy w/ federal drug pricing

  19. It’s All About the Data • Create registries to track highest acuity patients • Track percentage of mental health burden on PCP’s panel • Ensure not overwhelming particular providers • Track outcomes • Functional and symptom improvement • Assess degree of integration • E.g. Atlas of Integrated Behavioral Health Care Quality Measures • http://integrationacademy.ahrq.gov/

  20. Changing Policy • Ensure MH billing can occur in primary care setting • Pay flat rates for specialty providers • Spend 1 day/wk at FQHC • Colorado’s SHAPE initiative—global payment model for integration • Sustaining Healthcare Across Integrated Primary Care Efforts • Rocky Mountain Health Plans • Oregon

  21. Model Adjustments • We have adjusted our model to address several key areas • Use of modified registry • Risk Stratification • Flexible Access

  22. Model Adjustments – Modified Registry • Priority Level System • Addresses patients with acute safety issues or significant psychosis • Pts ranked 1-4 based on our clinical evaluation • BHC caseload = 3s and 4s • Priority 4: expectation is weekly contact, typically near need for hospitalization • Priority 3: expectation is monthly contact, and follow up on no shows/ lack of engagement

  23. Model Adjustments – Risk Stratification • Identification of patients using data systems – Who do we not know about and need to? • Psych hospital/ ER DC list • BHCs intervene on those who’s follow up is with the PCP • Assess current clinical status, knowledge of medication changes, ability to get meds, follow up care & barriers; link to RN/ pharmacy/ navigator as needed • Being done by navigators for medical DCs • We have repeatedly found that specific people with some MH knowledge are needed to do this type of work for the BH population • Intend to propose BH specific navigators

  24. Model Adjustments – Risk Stratification • Identification of patients using data systems (cont) • Daily List • Patients with visits scheduled that day • MH Flag • Tier 3 & 4 (CMMI tiering intervention) • BHCs are asked to: • Review the list daily and ID pts that they will try to meet with • Known patients who need follow up • Screen unknown patients for MH needs • It remains to be seen if we are identifying the “right” patients

  25. Model Adjustments • Identification of patients using data systems (cont) • The trials and tribulations of screening • Large population • Can we address all the need we find? • How much time will we spend screening/ how many patients will we ID who actually are appropriate for BHC services • Who should do the screening? • Two clinic pilots – tried to incorporate screening into the general clinic process using navigators and HCPs have failed • We have temporarily settled on the BHCs screening the Tier 3 & 4 patients • Screen for depression, anxiety, PTSD, bipolar & substance abuse • Will take time to screen this population • Hope in the future to use BH specific navigators in this role

  26. Model Adjustments – Risk Stratification • High Risk Case Conference • CMMI intervention • Identifies patients at the clinic/ PCP level • By diagnosis data (DRG) & utilization • 4 Current Clinic Pilots to ID the best model • One theme so far has been that a lot of the changes made to plans of care involve significant SW and BH involvement

  27. Model Adjustments– Flexible Access • Drop in access – Psychiatry & BHC • Successfully pilot at one clinic – one half day a week • Addresses high no show rate • Patient Centered - allows for care at the time the patient needs it most • Has sig. increased the number of patients actually seen by psychiatry

  28. Future Directions • Tighter coordination of services • SW, navigator role, pharmacy • Better utilizing specific skill sets • Broadening walk-in access • Identification of patient preference for treatment modalities • Telephonic interventions • Groups • Brief therapy • Identification of the “right” group of patients to outreach • Better coordination with and flow between specialty MHCs

  29. Questions & Discussion

  30. Session Evaluation Please complete and return theevaluation form to the classroom monitor before leaving this session. Thank you!