1 / 20

A Framework for Poverty Measurement Using EU-SILC Brian Nolan and Christopher T. Whelan

A Framework for Poverty Measurement Using EU-SILC Brian Nolan and Christopher T. Whelan. Outline. The current position on poverty measures and targets Moving forward – the case for a tiered approach Moving forward – a revised consistent poverty measure Conclusions. The Current Position.

alamea
Télécharger la présentation

A Framework for Poverty Measurement Using EU-SILC Brian Nolan and Christopher T. Whelan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Framework for Poverty Measurement Using EU-SILC Brian Nolan and Christopher T. Whelan

  2. Outline • The current position on poverty measures and targets • Moving forward – the case for a tiered approach • Moving forward – a revised consistent poverty measure • Conclusions

  3. The Current Position • Poverty defined as exclusion because of lack of resources • Low income on its own does not distinguish those experiencing generalised deprivation • For various reasons, identifies “at risk of poverty” not “poor” • Scale of income growth means relative income poverty rates particularly misleading as sole indicator for Ireland • Poverty has not gone up! • Combining low income with basic deprivation to measure “consistent poverty” captures those in most need

  4. The Current Position • 8 “basic deprivation” items originally used in constructing consistent poverty measure • Adapted set explored in various more recent ESRI studies, which also monitor relative and “anchored” income poverty rates • NAPS global poverty reduction target set in terms of reducing consistent poverty to < 2% • Based on original set of deprivation items • Change from LII survey to EU-SILC means measured deprivation levels higher in 2003

  5. Need for A Framework • No one indicator tells us all we want to know • Both income and deprivation are measured imprecisely • Both living standards and relativities matter • In the short term, improvements in living standards have a major immediate impact • In the medium/longer term, expectations adjust so distance from the median also matters for “participation in ordinary life of society”

  6. A Tiered Approach • Three-tiered approach to monitoring progress suggested by ESRI some time ago • Want to see: • 1/ Real incomes rising and deprivation levels falling for those on low incomes • 2/ Consistent poverty falling (with both fixed and slowly changing set of items) • 3/ Relative income poverty falling • Priority ordering as listed

  7. Monitoring the Tiers • Tier 1: Numbers below income poverty thresholds anchored at a point in time (Laeken); deprivation levels, esp. for those on low incomes (being developed at EU level) • Tier 2: Consistent poverty with both fixed and changing set of items • Tier 3: Numbers below relative income thresholds; numbers persistently below those thresholds; poverty gaps (all Laeken)

  8. Revising Consistent Poverty • EU SILC Data. • Identifying dimensions of deprivation. • Propose a new 12-item basic deprivation index. • 6 items drawn from earlier index relating to food, clothes, heat. • 6 new items relating to acceptable level of involvement in family and social life.

  9. Deprivation Dimensions • Basic : two pairs of strong shoes, a warm waterproof coat, a roast once a week… • Consumption: a telephone, a dish washer, a car… • Housing facilities: bath/shower, hot water, central heating… • Neighbourhood environment: leaking roof & damp, pollution, noise…

  10. Basic Dimension Household & Household members can not afford OLD ITEMS • Two pairs of strong shoes • A warm waterproof coat • New rather than second-hand clothes • Eat meals with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day? • A roast joint (or its equivalent) once a week • Go without heating during the last 12 months through lack of money (ref pers) NEW ITEMS • Presents for family or friends at least once a year • A week’s holiday away from home in the last 12 months • Keep the home adequately warm • Replace any worn out furniture • Have family or friends for a drink or meal once a month • Have a morning, afternoon or evening out in the last fortnight, for entertainment (ref pers)

  11. Distribution of Deprivation on Basic Deprivation Scales

  12. Economic Strain by Deprivation

  13. Economic Strain Among Income Poor by EU-SILC 12

  14. Consistent Poverty by Alternative Deprivation Scales

  15. Deprivation Items by Consistent Poverty Measures (70% Line)

  16. Deprivation Dimensions by Consistent Poverty Measures (60% & 70% Median Line)

  17. Economic Strain by Consistent Poverty Measures (70% Median Line)

  18. Housing Costs a Heavy Burden by Consistent Poverty Measures (60% & 70% Median Line)

  19. Debt & Expenses Difficulties by Consistent Poverty (60% & 70% Median Line)

  20. Conclusions • Tiered approach should replace sole focus on consistent poverty in measuring progress in NAPS: focus on • Real incomes and living standards • Consistent poverty • Relative income poverty. • With EU SILC, 12-item index captures basic deprivation • Combined with income line and using threshold of 2+, level of consistent poverty similar to original measures. • Identifies distinctive group experiencing generalised deprivation due to lack of resources

More Related