1 / 37

Educational Gaming Middle School Children’s Preferences

Educational Gaming Middle School Children’s Preferences. Dolly Joseph, Ph.D. Mable Kinzie, Ph.D. University of Virginia. Prior Findings. Games provide opportunities for: Serious Play Rieber, Smith, & Noah Flow Csikszentmihalyi

alan-sampson
Télécharger la présentation

Educational Gaming Middle School Children’s Preferences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educational GamingMiddle School Children’s Preferences Dolly Joseph, Ph.D. Mable Kinzie, Ph.D. University of Virginia

  2. Prior Findings • Games provide opportunities for: • Serious Play Rieber, Smith, & Noah • Flow Csikszentmihalyi • Identification, sequencing & classification Henderson, et al • Skill based, declarative, procedural, strategic & affective learning Garris et al • Game creation: evaluation, content mastery, problem-solving practice Kafai

  3. Research Questions • What attributes of computer games are appealing to middle school students? • How can these attributes be successfully incorporated into educational games? • What gender differences exist in middle school children’s preferences?

  4. Methodologies • Got Game! Camps • Two 2-week camps to investigate game playing preferences of middle school students • Qualitative research methodology~ in-depth case study and cross-case analysis • Survey • Multiple choice and likert scale survey • Administered to 44 middle school students • Analyzed for gender differences

  5. Got Game? • Setting • Research Participants • Analysis • Results

  6. Setting • Two locations • GMS- Public suburban school • Predominately White • 16% free or reduced lunch • 10 participants, 5 boys & 5 girls • TASK- Local not-for-profit organization • Predominately African-American • 100% free or reduced lunch • 11 participants, 7 boys & 4 girls

  7. Structure • Exploration, Reflection & Creation • Game play • Discussion • Video Closet “Confessional” • Journaling • Game modification • Game creation • Thematic Elements • Functional, • Aesthetic, • Character & • Educational Design

  8. Participants Anthony • 6th grade, African American & Caucasian from TASK • Loved the Myst-like game Bioscopia • Gravitated towards games that had clear goals and procedures- Oregon Trail was too complex • Liked to know that he had solved problems correctly

  9. Participants Diana • 7th grade, Mexican American from TASK • Enjoyed games with a problem solving component • Favorite games included driving games • Preferred games with clearly identifiable goals

  10. Participants Megan • 8th grade, Caucasian from GMS • Loved to collaborate during play and creation • Enjoyed complex play and adaptable goals • Liked controlling social interactions of characters

  11. Participants Paul • 7th grade, African American from TASK • Liked complex, realistic problems • Wanted “action” and “conflict” in games • Liked to set own goals

  12. Analysis • In-depth case studies & cross-case analysis structured by: • Participation Style • Preferred Activity types • Thematic Elements

  13. Activity types • Alternative to industry classifications • Emphasizes player’s experiences within gameplay • Emerged during analysis of children’s gameplay • Tested and refined through follow up survey • 6 types are usually found in combination

  14. Active Play • Time pressured play • Rapid character death and rebirth • Dichotomous storylines • All studied campers were proficient • Educational games which included active play were rated highly

  15. Explorative Play • Physical space and travel are simulated through game board layout • Players discover new areas and challenges in turn • Most often found in combination with other activity types • Was a preferred mode for one camper • Several highly rated games include explorative aspects, including Zoombinis and Osmosis Jones

  16. Problem-solving • Discreet challenges with set goals, specific rules and correct solutions • Multiple challenges games are generally independent • Can be fast- or slow- paced • Enjoyable for all studied participants • Clear challenges and readily apparent success and failure appealing • Reviewed educational games often contain problem solving activities, but insufficiently challenging

  17. Strategic Play • Long-term manipulation of resources • Flexible goals • Multiple pathways through the game • 2 of the 4 campers enjoyed this mode • Greater complexity may be overly challenging • Few educational games incorporate this mode

  18. Social Play • Intra-game~ players control game’s character in social interactions • Multi-player~ players compete against others • Collaborative~ players work together • Intra-game play was a preferred mode of only one campers • Multi-player & collaborative play were compelling to three of the four campers • Social play was not a component for any surveyed games

  19. Creative Play • Creation or personalization of artifacts within the game environment • Manipulation of “skins” found within The Sims, the Tycoon series and others • May not be seen as a game-like due to lack of obvious competition • Only 1 camper demonstrated a strong preference for creative play • Few of the surveyed educational games contained this element

  20. Results • 4 game design suggestions • Designed for a “type” of player • Alternate gameplay for other “types” • Exciting gameplay with integrated content

  21. Cures of the Rainforest • Goal: find plants with potential curative properties within the rainforest • Activity types: social, strategy, creative, problem-solving, active • Gameplay: select a team of experts best suited to reach the goal, while managing emergencies and negotiating challenges • Content: flora/fauna of region, botany, geography

  22. Vigilante PI • Goal: solve crimes and bring corrupt businessmen to justice • Activity types: strategy, problem-solving, active • Gameplay: solve crimes in an urban neighborhood, using mental powers, as well as a bit of muscle • Content: forensics, chemistry, health-hazards

  23. Butterfly Babies • Goal: collect, breed, and “grow” butterflies • Activity types: problem-solving, active, creative • Gameplay: choose a variety of butterflies, breed them for a variety of phenotypes • Content: biology, genetics, lab procedures

  24. Zoo Rescue • Goal: free a trapped zookeeper by traveling through a maze-like zoo • Activity types: Explorative, problem-solving, active • Gameplay: travel through a series of passageways in order to progress, the player must answer questions and solve puzzles • Content: biology, ecology

  25. Survey • Setting • Research Participants • Analysis • Initial Results

  26. Setting • Suburban Middle School • Two heterogeneously grouped homerooms • 6th- 8th grades • 42 of 44 surveys returned • 64% White, 12% Asian, 10% African American, 2% Hispanic, and 12% Other

  27. Survey • Demographic/ Game Play Experience • Character/Setting/Help Preferences • Activity Mode Preferences • Activity Mode Attitudes

  28. Analysis • Statistical significance- gender differences • One way ANOVAs • Pearson Chi-Square Tests

  29. Game Play Experience • Significant gender differences • Type of hardware p<.01 • Boys= Consoles / Girls= Computer • No significant gender difference: • How often • How long • Access to Internet • Play with others

  30. Character • Significant gender differences: • Preference for own gender p<.001 • Girls prefer thinner female characters p<.05 • No significant gender differences • Character age • Male build • Significant ethnicity difference • Whites prefer White characters, Other races/ethnicities prefer other ethnicities p<.001

  31. Setting • Significant gender differences • Boys prefer games set in the “street” or sports fields, Girls prefer games set in a mall or meadow p<.01 • Boys prefer warlords as opponents, girls prefer rival kids p<.05 • Boys have greater interest in saving adults and senior citizens, Girls would rather save young children p<.05 • No significant gender difference • Animals vs. people- individual vs. groups • Method of meeting challenge

  32. Mode Preference In a game I most like to: • Fight an enemy active • Design objects like cars or clothes creative • Control individuals social • Work out puzzles problem-solving

  33. Mode Preference • Significant gender difference • Girls prefer • Creative p<.01 • Boys prefer • Explorative p<.05 • Active p<.001 • Strategy p<.01 • No significant gender difference • Problem-solving • Social

  34. Activity Attitudes If I had a telescope in a game I would like to watch the neighbors, 1 2 3 4

  35. Activity Attitudes • Significant gender differences • Girls prefer • Creative p<.01 • Boys prefer • Active p<.01 • Strategy p<.01 • No significant gender differences • Explorative • Social • Problem-solving

  36. Recommendations • Testing of activity types with larger populations of children • Prototypical game design with the inclusion of activity types • Game designs which also address the interests of girls

  37. Contact Information Mable Kinzie kinzie@virginia.edu Dolly Joseph dolly@virginia.edu

More Related