1 / 32

D-R&D-2: TPC R&D

D-R&D-2: TPC R&D. R&D for TPC applications A TPC for the ILC. ILC – International Linear Collider. 3 designs out of 4 chose a TPC as a main tracker. The R&D is carried out worldwide by the LC-TPC collaboration. TPC – Time Projection Chamber. t. Ionizing particle.

alangonzalez
Télécharger la présentation

D-R&D-2: TPC R&D

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. D-R&D-2: TPC R&D R&D for TPC applications A TPC for the ILC P. Colas - TPC R&D

  2. ILC – International Linear Collider 3 designs out of 4 chose a TPC as a main tracker The R&D is carried out worldwide by the LC-TPC collaboration P. Colas - TPC R&D

  3. TPC – Time Projection Chamber t Ionizing particle Electrons separate from ions The electrons drift under the E field E B The magnetic field reduces electron diffusion y x x-y coordinates given by the pads z coordinate given by the time P. Colas - TPC R&D

  4. S1 S2 Micromegas and GEM Micromegas : a micromesh supported by 50-100 mm - high insulating pillars. Multiplication takes place between the anode and the mesh. One stage GEM: Two copper perforated foils separated by an insulator (50 mm) Multiplication takes place in the holes. Usually used in 2 or 3 stages, even 4 200 mm P. Colas - TPC R&D

  5. Outline • The team • Collaborative activities since 2005 • Achievements • Projects P. Colas - TPC R&D

  6. The team • JAPAN • KEK/IPNS • K. Fujii • M. Kobayashi • H. Kuroiwa • T. Matsuda • R. Yonamine • Saga • A. Aoza • (H. Fujishima) • T. Higashi • A. Ishikawa • A. Sugiyama • H. Tsuji • Kinki U. • Y. Kato • T. Yazu • K. Hiramatsu • Hiroshima U. • T. Takahashi • Tokyo TUAT • M. Bitou • (M. Habu) • (K. Nakamura) • O. Nitoh • H. Ohta • K. Sakai • Kogakuin • T. Watanabe • FRANCE • CEA/Dapnia Saclay • (D. Burke) • M. Chefdeville • P. Colas • A. Giganon • I. Giomataris • M. Riallot • F. Sénée • S. Turnbull • CNRS/IN2P3 Orsay • V. Lepeltier (LAL) • Ph. Rosier (IPN) • T. Zerguerras (IPN) P. Colas - TPC R&D

  7. Collaborative activities • (pre-)History • In Japan : CDC group, legacy of Tristan and LEP/SLC, back to the 1990s, worked on a Central Drift Chamber • In Europe and America: in the the early 2000s, started R&D on MPGD TPCs. In 2002, M. Ronan, M. Dixit and P.C visited KEK and advertised TPC. In 2003-2004, R. Settles (MPI Munich) initiated a collaboration to test the 3 technologies : wires, GEM and Micromegas. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  8. Collaborative activities • In 2004 in Paris, we (Orsay-Saclay) decided to join and to bring a Micromegas endplate, adapted to the MPI field cage • Use the PCMAG magnet(s) and the p2 4 GeV pion beam at KEK PS, the trigger setup, and the ALEPH electronics • From pictures and mail exchanges, we made a 384-pad endplate and installed it at KEK in June P. Colas - TPC R&D

  9. In June 2005, we installed commissioned and took beam data From France: Paul Colas Arnaud Giganon Vincent Lepeltier Thomas Zerguerras P. Colas - TPC R&D

  10. Collaborative activities As the beam was available only until december, we decided to organise another data taking to test a new technique to spread the charge: the resistive foil technique (M. Dixit et al., Carleton U.) A second endplate was built in Saclay, with a resistive coating on the anode, and both the MPI and Carleton TPCs were run simultaneously in the same beam, push-pulling in the magnet. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  11. Beam tests in October 2005 at KEK Carleton-Saclay TPC MP-TPC Micromegas Charge dispersion readout endplates • - Micromegas 10 x 10 cm2 • - Drift distance: 16 cm • - 126 pads, 2 x 6 mm2 each in 7 rows • ALEPH preamps + 200 MHz FADCs • Micromegas 10 x 10 cm2 • Drift distance: 25 cm • - 384 pads, 2.3 x 6.3 mm2 each in 16 rows • ALEPH preamps + 11 MHz AlephTime Projection Digitizers P. Colas - TPC R&D

  12. Spreading of charge due to foil can be seen across six pads P. Colas - TPC R&D

  13. France-Japan meeting(s) in Paris in September 2006, followed by a 3-day endplate meeting with a large Japanese attendance (K. Fujii, Y. Kato, H. Kuroiwa, T. Matsuda, A. Sugiyama) http://www-dapnia.cea.fr/Spp/Meetings/EndPlate/ For the first time, a french attendance at the japanese MPGD meeting in Saga, in January 2007 (D. Attié, P. Colas) Participation of K. Fujii in a TPC analysis “Jamboree” in Aix-la-Chapelle, March 2007 P. Colas - TPC R&D

  14. Gasbox for studying gas gain fluctuations from the resolution on the 55Fe 5.9 keV line Blueprints drawn in Saclay. Realisation at KEK. 2 of these gasboxes built in Saclay, for gas+pixel and aging studies Saclay KEK P. Colas - TPC R&D

  15. The CF4 “saga” • We tried to take data with Ar CF4 • The detector was very unstable, very different from what we had in Saclay, with afterpulses. • We suspected Japanese CF4 to be different from European CF4 • After a complicated exchange of bottles and careful gas analyses, the two gases were shown to be the same • The difference was traced to the presence of impurities in the gas system in Saclay, quenching UVs • An admixture of 2% isobutane was found to be enough to stop the UVs and stabilise the operation. • This gas Ar CF4 isobutane (fast, low diffusion) is likely to be used by T2K and is favored for the ILC. It is being tested in KEK. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  16. Analysis of theJune test beam April-May 2006 : data analysis with 2 independent methods / programs P. Colas - TPC R&D

  17. Drift velocity measurement Achievements Using a beam at 45 deg. Look at time distribution on one pad. Max time gives drift time over 26.08+-0.02 cm (add trig. delay) • Cross-check of gas purity and MC simulation 1 cm scint. cathode Vdrift (Ar+5%iso, E=220V/cm) = 4.181 +- 0.034 cm/ms In agreement with Magboltz : 4.173 +- 0.016 P. Colas - TPC R&D

  18. Measurement of the diffusion coefficient at B=0, 0.5 and 1T 2 methods: global likelihood fit of the track width to all pad charges (shown here), or width of the PRF (slope at large distance is unbiased) in m/√cm Good agreement between the two methods and good agreement with Magboltz. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  19. Achievements Understanding the basic limitations of the resolution • Triggered by discussions on the data, the role of the ionization statistics, gas gain fluctuations and finite pad width were studied in detail (K. Fujii, M. Kobayashi) • Asymptotically, s2=s02+(DT2/Neff) z • Why is Neff much smaller than Ntot ? P. Colas - TPC R&D

  20. Study of the resolution (theory) • At large drift distance, transverse diffusion dominates: resol ~ CD√z/√Neff • Neff different from Ntot because of • Ionisation fluctuations 1/<1/N> • Gain fluctuations: x <G2>/<G>2 • At small distance, hodoscope effect: not enough charge spreading by diffusion to encompass more than 1 pad Ex: for 60 e- total, Neff=21.2±2.7 P. Colas - TPC R&D

  21. Resolution measurement B=0 r.m.s. of the residuals (√swithswo) 2 methods for the track: global likelihood fit or c2 fit Note: bias at small z - the track is reconstructed close to the middle of the central pad (hollow points) P. Colas - TPC R&D

  22. Resolution measurement B=0.5 and 1T P. Colas - TPC R&D

  23. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  24. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  25. Taking the finite pad width into account, K. Fujii derived a fully analytic formula for the resolution P. Colas - TPC R&D

  26. Scaling 1/√12 (use dimensionless quantities scaled by the pad width w) The resolution dependance on z has two regimes: At large z the asymptotic behaviour follows the diffusion limit At low z the effect of finite pad size dominates. For typical values of Neff, the optimal resolution is about 10% of the pad size. 1/√(12.Neff) P. Colas - TPC R&D

  27. Achievements KEK test beam Micromegas with resistive foil With charge spreading, the resolution was measured to be 50 microns at low z (and at all z for large enough B field) P. Colas - TPC R&D

  28. Extrapolation to ILC-TPC Conclusion: even with 1mm pitch, Micromegas with standard pads would not quite fulfill the requirement of better than 130 micron point resolution. However with a resisitive foil and 2.3 mm pads, this goal is largerly attained (red curve). P. Colas - TPC R&D

  29. Achievements Broken record on the 55Fe line resolution (5.6%) KEK, january 2007 threshold200 eV! P. Colas - TPC R&D

  30. Work in progress and plans • Large Prototype : a world collaboration by LC-TPC, using the EUDET infrastructure • PCMAG Magnet lend by KEK, associate to the EUDET project. Installed in DESY in December 2006 • CDC group, Canadian group, Tsinghua are responsible for the GEM panels. Saclay, Orsay and Carleton are responsible for the Micromegas panels => as much as possible development in common • A. Sugiyama and PC are coordinating GEM and Micromegas panels • A test of operation of GEMs and Micromegas with neutrons is necessary and the France-Japan collaboration explores this possibility • In 2008-2009, we will take data together at DESY in the PCMAG magnet, do the analysis together, in the scope of choosing the technology. P. Colas - TPC R&D

  31. Large Prototype panels D. Peterson, Cornell Saga GEM prototype panel (3700 channels) f = 80cm P. Colas - TPC R&D

  32. Summary • We maintained a privileged french-japanese axis in the worldwide collaboration for a Linear Collider TPC • This was the backbone of the Micromegas TPC beam tests • This collaboration was very fruitful and lead to a detailed understanding of the fundamental limitations on the resolution of a Micropattern TPC. • In the near future, we should bring a major contribution to the Large Prototype design and construction. P. Colas - TPC R&D

More Related