1 / 56

Alameda County: Family Care

Survey of CIC Program Participants: Who Joined and How Did They Change Their Care-Seeking Behavior? Catherine McLaughlin University of Michigan Erin Fries Taylor Mathematica Policy Research WebCast Presentation CIC programs June 23, 2004. Survey in 3 CIC Sites.

alank
Télécharger la présentation

Alameda County: Family Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Survey of CIC Program Participants: Who Joined and How Did They Change Their Care-Seeking Behavior? • Catherine McLaughlinUniversity of MichiganErin Fries Taylor • Mathematica Policy Research • WebCast Presentation • CIC programs • June 23, 2004

  2. Survey in 3 CIC Sites • Alameda County: Family Care • Insurance product for parents of children enrolled in Alameda Alliance for Health • 300% FPL or less • Austin: I-Care • Not an insurance product, collaboration of area hospitals and charity care organizations • 250% FPL or less • Southern Maine: CarePartners • Donated care model • 150% FPL or less

  3. Research Questions • Who joined? • Changes in care-seeking behavior? • Changes in satisfaction and perceived access? • Differences by race/ethnicity? • Alameda and Austin • Differences by chronic illness? • Southern Maine • Who stays and who leaves?

  4. Survey Content • Household information • Demographics • Income and employment • Previous health insurance coverage (asked at baseline) • Health status and utilization • Usual source of care, unmet need • Satisfaction, attitudes

  5. Wave 1 Details • Site provided contact information on all new enrollees over a period of 4-6 months • Completed interviews in Wave 1 • -Alameda: 471 adults (Aug 01–Jan 02) • 88% response rate • -Austin: 347 adults (Feb–Aug 02) • 87% response rate • -S Maine: 300 adults (Nov 01–June 02) • 93% response rate

  6. Baseline Survey Data • Who participates in each CIC program? • Were there differences in characteristics by race/ethnicity? • Were there differences in characteristics by chronic illness?

  7. Selected Socio-Demographics

  8. Income, Employment, and Previous Insurance Status

  9. Race/Ethnic/Language Composition: Alameda County English-speaking (7%) Asians Cantonese-speaking (30%) English-speaking (5%) Others English-speaking (10%) Latinos Spanish-speaking (48%)

  10. Selected Socio-demographics by Race/Ethnicity: Alameda County

  11. Race/Ethnic/Language Composition: Austin Whites English-speaking (16%) English-speaking (22%) Others English-speaking (12%) Latinos Spanish-speaking (50%)

  12. Selected Socio-demographics by Race/Ethnicity: Austin

  13. Baseline Health Status and Care-Seeking Behavior

  14. Preventive Services in Previous Year Alameda Austin S. Maine Physical Exam 38% 31% 53% 84% 59% 61% Blood Pressure Check Breast Exam (among women) 30% 22% 55% Pap Smear (among women) 50% 44% 34%

  15. Doctor's Office Hospital Outpatient 1% 1% 8% 2% Other Clinic or Health 3% 12% 36% 20% 38% 36% Hospital ER or Urgent 62% 9% Some Other Place 23% 43% 6% Alameda Usual Source of Care: S. Maine Austin

  16. Alameda: Health and Care-Seeking Behaviors: Themes by Race/Ethnicity • Asians and Latinas reported worse health status, but fewer chronic conditions • Cantonese-speaking Asians rated health status lower than English-speaking Asians • Latinas and Other were more likely to have an ER visit or a doctor visit • Asians reported lowest out-of pocket costs and Other reported the highest

  17. More on Baseline Health in Alameda: Themes by Race/Ethnicity • Cantonese-speaking Asians were most likely to have no health care utilization • Those in Other category were most likely to report unmet need

  18. Austin: Utilization Rates By Race/Ethnicity

  19. Baseline Health and Care-Seeking Behaviors: Themes by Race/Ethnicity In both Alameda and Austin, Latinos report worse health status and, at the same time, fewer report chronic or limiting condition(s) than other participants • Alameda County • Cantonese-speaking Asians were most likely to have no health care utilization, but also report worse health status than English-speaking Asians • Austin • Spanish-speaking Latinos were most likely to have no health care utilization, but also report worse health status than English-speaking Latinos

  20. Self-Reported Health Status by Race/Ethnicity Austin Alameda

  21. S. Maine: Baseline Utilization Rates by Presence of Chronic Condition

  22. S. Maine: Out-of-Pocket Health Care Costs in Previous Year (if Costs>0)

  23. Having a Usual Source of Care Made a Difference in: • Having any physician visits, ER visits, or hospital stays • Receiving preventive care • Physical exam • Blood pressure check • Breast exam (among females) • Pap smear (among females) • Having a personal health care provider

  24. Having Insurance Coverage in Last 12 Months Made a Difference in: • Having any physician visits • Receiving preventive care: • Physical exam • Blood pressure check • Breast exam (among females) • Pap smear (among females) • Having a usual source of care and a personal health care provider

  25. Research Questions: Changes • Changes in health status, health care utilization, and care-seeking behavior? • e.g., decrease ED use, increase preventive care • Changes in satisfaction and perceived access? • e.g., less self-reported unmet need • Are there race/ethnic differences in these changes? • Are there differences in changes for those with a chronic condition?

  26. Use Pre/Post Comparison: Wave I vs. Wave II + Wave III • Utilization data for the 12 months before and for the 12 months post-enrolling • Continuous enrollees and those who disenrolled • Possible “seam bias” (doublecounting), so rely more on “Yes/No used” than the count data of how many visits • Change = used only before or used only after enrolling

  27. Number of Respondents by Wave *Continued high response rates (>80%)

  28. Alameda: Comparisons of Medical Care UseBefore and After Enrollment change no change N=330, survey respondents who were continuously enrolled in CIC

  29. Alameda: Comparisons of ED Use Before and After Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity change no change Note: there are no statistically significant differences for hospital use

  30. Doc use ED use Hosp use After enrollment only 32% 16% 9% Before enrollment only 3 16 6 Both before and after enrollment 52 15 0 Neither before or after enrollment 13 52 85 Austin: Comparisons of Medical Care UseBefore and After Enrollment change no change N=164, survey respondents who were continuously enrolled in CIC

  31. Doctor Use ED use Latino Other Latino Other 19% 10% After enrollment only 32% 29% Before enrollment only 3 4 16 17 Both before and after enrollment 48* 63* 13 21 53 52 Neither before nor after enrollment 16** 4** 116 48 Number of respondents 116 48 Austin: Comparisons of Use Before and After Enrollment by Ethnicity change no change

  32. Doc use ED use Hosp use After enrollment only 17% 12% 9% Before enrollment only 0 18 6 Both before and after enrollment 83 43 12 Neither before or after enrollment 0 27 73 S. Maine: Comparisons of Medical Care UseBefore and After Enrollment change no change N = 99, survey respondents who were continuously enrolled in CIC

  33. S. Maine: Comparisons of Use Before and After by Presence of Chronic Illness change no change *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01, significantly different by presence of chronic illness

  34. Alameda: Comparisons in Preventive Care Use Before and After Enrollment, Enrollees change no change

  35. Physical exam Blood pressure After enrollment only 36% 27% Before enrollment only 5 5 Both before and after enrollment 23 55 Neither before or after enrollment 35 12 Austin: Comparisons in Preventive Care Use Before and After Enrollment change no change

  36. Physical exam Blood pressure After enrollment only 34% 15% Before enrollment only 4 3 Both before and after enrollment 46 82 Neither before or after enrollment 16 1 S. Maine: Changes in Preventive Care Use Before and After Enrollment, Enrollees change no change

  37. Women’s Preventive Care in Alameda: Comparisons Before and After Enrollment change no change N = 220 women

  38. Breast exam Pap smear After enrollment only 41% 41% Before enrollment only 5 8 Both before and after enrollment 16 24 Neither before or after enrollment 37 27 Women’s Preventive Care in Austin: Comparisons Before and After Enrollment change no change N = 98 women

  39. Breast exam Pap smear After enrollment only 27% 27% Before enrollment only 10 10 Both before and after enrollment 40 40 Neither before or after enrollment 22 23 Women’s Preventive Care in S. Maine: Comparisons Before and After Enrollment change no change N = 62 women

  40. S. Maine: Comparisons of Breast Exams Before and After by Presence of Chronic Illness change no change

  41. Were There Changes Over Time in Medical Care Use? • In all 3 sites, there was a noticeable increase in physician visits and an even larger increase in the number receiving physical exams, PAP smears, and breast exams. • Only S. Maine showed a noticeable, although statistically insignificant, decrease in ED use • No site showed a noticeable change in hospital use

  42. Do Changes Over Time Differ in Different Populations? • In Alameda, changes in ED use varied significantly by race/ethnicity: Latinos were the most likely to go only before enrollment • In S. Maine, those without a chronic condition were more likely to increase use of physician services and to have a breast exam

  43. Different Use by Different Populations • Most of the differences in utilization by race/ethnicity and by the presence of a chronic condition are differences in level of use, not change in use after enrolling • Asians were less likely to use physician, ED, and hospital services both before and after enrollment • Latinos were more likely than Asians, but less likely than “other” to use physician, ED, and hospital services both before and after • Those with a chronic condition were more likely to use ED and hospital services both before and after

  44. Caveats • Results are based on self-reported utilization data -Utilization (e.g., visits) tend to be under-reported -Procedures (e.g., pap smears) tend to be over-reported -Errors of omission increase with length of recall

  45. Disenrollment • There were varying levels of disenrollment across the 3 sites, the highest in S. Maine • What were the reasons given for leaving? • Were disenrollees “different” from continuous enrollees? • What happened to disenrollees in terms of coverage, utilization, satisfaction?

  46. ESI ESI Medicaid Medicaid Uninsured Uninsured CarePartners CarePartners Possible Sample Transitions Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 N = 73 N = 84 N = 266 N = 89 N = 182 CarePartners Example and numbers presented are for S. Maine

  47. Possible Sample Transitions Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 N = 6 ESI N = 84 Medicaid Uninsured N = 266 N = 89 N = 182 CarePartners CarePartners CarePartners

  48. Possible Sample Transitions Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 N = 71 ESI ESI N = 84 Medicaid Medicaid Uninsured Uninsured N = 266 N = 89 N = 182 CarePartners CarePartners CarePartners

  49. Reasons for Disenrolling: S. Maine W2 W3 • Became eligible for another program 37% 72% • R or spouse got job that offered coverage 31 14 • Income too high to remain eligible 21 8 • Didn’t complete program paperwork 8 4 • Didn’t think needed care 7 1 • Couldn’t afford to remain in program 6 3 • Moved away from area 5 4 • Was unhappy with program 2 3 • Some other reason 2 6

  50. % of Participants by Insurance Status, Waves 2 and 3 • Wave 2 69 5 5 21 • Wave 369 4 8 18 Enrolled Disenrolled ESI Medicaid Uninsured

More Related