Presentation Transcript

1. Employee Effectiveness Project

2. What is the Effectiveness Project? A 360° professional focused, research based process designed to deliver the highest quality instruction to all Kaukauna Area School District students by: Implementing a professional evaluation system for Administrators, Teachers and Educational Specialists to produce the highest quality instruction by evaluating (1) standards of effective practice and (2) student achievement; Implementing a research based, value added interview and hiring process in order to hire the best fit candidate for the KASD; and Utilizing the professional evaluation system and professional hiring process to continually improve in order to deliver the highest quality instruction.
3. Overview of Effectiveness Project Presentation Why the need for an employee effectiveness project? Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction’s Role KASD’s Proposed Implementation of the Effectiveness Project CESA 6 Effectiveness Project Implementation of Effectiveness Project Financial Implications of Effectiveness Project
4. Why the Effectiveness Project?State and Federal Requirements 2011 Wisconsin Act 105: a District may use the results of standardized examinations to evaluate a teacher; Senate Bill 461 (March 15, 2012): Requires the DPI to develop educator effectiveness evaluation system, develop by rule, an equivalency process aligned with the state system, 50% teacher practice, 50% student achievement, implement by 2014-15 As part of the DPI’s request to the Federal Government for a waiver of the No Child Left Behind Act, and as signed into law by the Governor on April 2, 2012, the DPI has proposed that by the 2014-2015 school year: All Districts will implement a new evaluation system for educators and administrators that is based on professional standards; and 50% of an educator’s summative rating must be based on measures of student achievement.
5. What do the requirements of the DPI’s requested waiver mean for evaluations? The DPI’s requested waiver from the NCLB would require the following in teacher and administrator assessment: Teacher and administrator evaluation will be tied in some way to student progress on achievement tests. All public school teachers and principals will be included in the evaluation system. In November, 2011, The DPI’s Design Team worked to develop a framework for evaluating teachers and principals through a process that focused on two main areas: educator practice and student outcomes. Relies on the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Model Core Teaching Standards as well as the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards for the educator practice component of the evaluation tool. The project relies on components of Charlotte Danielson’s A Framework for Teaching to provide definition and specificity for the InTASC standards.
6. Overview of the CESA 6 Effectiveness Project
7. What is the CESA 6 Effectiveness Project? Led by Dr. James H. Strong of the College of William and Mary 2 components: Professional hiring process utilizing the teacher quality index; and Professional evaluation system for teachers, educational specialists, leaders and administrators that focuses on both the process and product of high quality instruction including (1) standards of effective practice and (2) student achievement.
8. Professional Evaluation System Features of the Professional Evaluation System: Standards, indicators and rubrics to measure the process of teaching and leading (practices) and the products of teaching and leading (student learner outcomes); Training for those who are responsible for implementing evaluations to assure fidelity; Coaching and calibration trainings to assure accuracy; Professional development based on performance evaluation data to assure all individuals have resources to improve their professional practice; Embedded technology will increase efficiency and data collection.
9. Professional Evaluation System Components Performance Standard Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and diverse needs of students by providing meaningful learning experiences. The teacher: Performance Indicators 1.1 Effectively addresses appropriate curriculum standards. 1.2 Integrates key content elements and higher-level thinking skills in instruction. Performance Appraisal Rubric
10. Professional Evaluation System Performance Standards for the Teacher Model: Professional Knowledge Instructional Planning Instructional Delivery Assessment For and Of Learning Learning Environment Professionalism
11. Professional Evaluation System Performance Standard Name Performance Standard
12. Professional Evaluation System Performance Indicators for the Teacher Model: PERFORMANCE STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
13. Professional Evaluation System Performance Appraisal Rubric for the Teacher Model: *Teachers rated as Distinguished frequently serve as role models or teacher leaders.
14. Professional Evaluation System Data Sources for Teachers:
15. Professional Evaluation System Example Evaluation Schedule:
16. Professional Evaluation System Technology Support: My Learning Plan through OASYS http://www.mylearningplan.com/Content/Home/oasys.html http://www.mylearningplan.com/Content/Home/oasys_observations_and_more.html#classroom-observations-and-walkthroughs
17. Implementation of Effectiveness Project
18. Financial Implications of Effectiveness Project