1 / 23

Forecasting the Winner of a Tennis Match

Overview. Forecasting: one aspect of a larger tennis projectMotivation for forecastingHow to compute forecasts during a match?Forecasting in practice: graph of the 2003 Ladies' Singles Wimbledon finalRobustness of the graphConclusion.. Tennis project. Testing hypotheses (six papers):7th game

albany
Télécharger la présentation

Forecasting the Winner of a Tennis Match

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Forecasting the Winner of a Tennis Match Franc Klaassen University of Amsterdam (NL) Jan R. Magnus Tilburg University (NL) TST Congress, London July 29, 2003

    2. Overview Forecasting: one aspect of a larger tennis project Motivation for forecasting How to compute forecasts during a match? Forecasting in practice: graph of the 2003 Ladies Singles Wimbledon final Robustness of the graph Conclusion.

    3. Tennis project Testing hypotheses (six papers): 7th game is the most important game in a set: false Real champions win the big points: true. Service strategy (in progress): How to choose the strengths of 1st and 2nd services to maximize the probability of winning a point? Rule changes (one paper): How to reduce the service dominance? Presented at TST-1. Forecasting (two papers): Forecasting winner while match is in progress: TST-2.

    4. Motivation for forecasting Forecasting the winner of a tennis match: Before a match Using odds from bookmakers Using statistical model, e.g., Boulier and Stekler (1999) Clarke and Dyte (2000) During a match Using statistical model ? focus of our paper.

    5. Why forecasting during match? TV spectators want information on: Which player leads at this moment? Who is most likely to win the match? How did the match develop up to now (momentum, winning mood)?

    6. TV spectators get info on Score: gives info on 1 (Leader): Yes 2 (Likely winner): Partially 4-6 for Agassi-Hewitt => Hewitt will probably win, 4-6 for Agassi-Henman => Agassi will still be the favorite 3 (Development up to now): Partially 5-5 can result after 4-4 (match in balance), but also after 5-0 (one player is in a winning mood) ? Room for improvement regarding 2 and 3.

    7. TV spectators also get info on Match/set stats (%1st serve in,...): give info on 2 (Likely winner): Not much 3 (Development up to now): Partially Comparison of 2nd set with 1st set statistics gives some insight, but each statistic is too aggregate to give a clear picture. Note: summary stats provide detailed info on specific aspects of each player ? useful, but beyond scope of our paper. ? Still room for improvement regarding 2 and 3 ? Purpose of current paper.

    8. Idea Present the probability that a player will win match; update it as match unfolds (real-time forecasting). Example: Agassi-Hewitt At start of match: Agassi wins with prob. 60% At 4-6: Agassi wins with prob. 30% At 4-6/0-3: Agassi wins with prob. 20%. Use graph to visualize the probs. of all points till now.

    9. How to compute the forecasts during a match? Suppose: match between players A and B. Goal: Prob{A wins match} at each point up to now. This probability depends on 2 inputs (besides score): Prob{A wins match} at start of match Prob{A wins point on serve}+Prob{B wins point on serve}. Implementation using our computer program TENNISPROB: Choose the two inputs before the match and keep them constant Type in the score at each point ? TENNISPROB gives Prob{A wins match} very quickly.

    10. How to choose the two inputs? Prob{A wins match} at start of match We provide an estimate based on rankings (e.g., 80%), but one can easily improve/overrule that estimate if one has specific other info (injury problems, specific ability of surface,...) (e.g., 70%) ? In the end there is one starting point of the graph (70%). Prob{A wins point on serve}+Prob{B wins point on serve} We provide an estimate based on rankings (e.g., 120%: both players win 60% of their points on service) No need for adjustment: the graph hardly depends on our choice ? There is an estimate (120%).

More Related