1 / 7

ECRIT Security Considerations

ECRIT Security Considerations. IETF 65 Status Report Tom Taylor. Status of Document. draft-taylor-ecrit-security-threats-03 accepted as WG work item Resubmitted as draft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-00 Deleted unused definitions Deleted term ASP/VSP as proposed on the list.

alberthuffman
Télécharger la présentation

ECRIT Security Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECRIT Security Considerations IETF 65 Status Report Tom Taylor

  2. Status of Document • draft-taylor-ecrit-security-threats-03 accepted as WG work item • Resubmitted asdraft-ietf-ecrit-security-threats-00 • Deleted unused definitions • Deleted term ASP/VSP as proposed on the list

  3. Threats To Emergency Identifier • Threat of fraud identified • Misuse of identifier for ordinary calls • Call signalling does not necessarily carry location information • Now part of security considerations for emergency identifier draft • Further threat of use as probe to identify entities for further attack

  4. Threats To Mapping • Denial of service attacks • Flooding • Interception • Replay • Alteration • Impersonation of mapping server • Database corruption • Reflection attacks • Breach of confidentiality

  5. Recommendations • Requirements proposed • Some affect ECRIT work directly • Others are requirements for discussions in Security Considerations sections

  6. Major Issue • Major issue is strength of requirements on mapping protocol design • MUST provide authentication, confidentiality • or • MUST allow authentication, provision of connfidentiality

  7. Future Of Document • Should document be published as a stand-alone item? • Alternative: • Content gets taken up into Security Considerations sections of other work items • This document remains open as working document when new work items added

More Related