1 / 10

POSTMODERNISM & DEVELOPMENT

POSTMODERNISM & DEVELOPMENT. Presenter Pratistha Koirala. Postmodernism: Panacea, Placebo or Perversity?. Geography and development studies in 1990s Gained prominence as one of the routes for transcending the so-called theoretical ‘impasse’- 1980s.

aldona
Télécharger la présentation

POSTMODERNISM & DEVELOPMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. POSTMODERNISM & DEVELOPMENT Presenter Pratistha Koirala

  2. Postmodernism: Panacea, Placebo or Perversity? Geography and development studies in 1990s Gained prominence as one of the routes for transcending the so-called theoretical ‘impasse’- 1980s • Panacea- solution or remedy for all difficulties • Placebo- medicine prescribed for mental benefit of the patient rather than for any physical effect • Perversity- contrary to that which is accepted or expected

  3. The divergent position on the relevance of postmodernism • Lack of interest: peculiarly disparate, amorphous nature, mode of explanation of postmodernism • Due to which little exposure to these debates

  4. History • 1970s- Art, architecture and literature • Rejection by the then dominant modernist school • Charles Jencks and Vincent Scully • Gabriel Garcia Marquez & Carlos Fuentes in literature- flashbacks, forward leaps

  5. Social science: post structuralist rejection of meta theories & grand narratives; critical social theory; concern with the deconstruction of ideology and official discourses, growing cynicism- estab..orders & vested power; alienation of Northern societies; so-called ‘cultural turn’

  6. Frederic Jameson, Ed Soja – logic of late capitalism, profit accumulation: globalised production and consumption • Escobar- critique of ‘the development project’ • Colas- Argentinian society • Esteva and Prakash- regional & local level postmodernism practice as social action • Slater- geopolitical & developmental debates across North-South divide • Corbridge- relevance relative to post-colonialism

  7. Criticisms: • Poverty and fruits of modernism? • Northerm paradigm, leisured heterodoxes- irrelevant to global South

  8. Conceptual Schema • The chronological approach- literal interpretation; Fordist Assembly Line rejection by development specialists • The aesthetic approach- art, architecture & literature; elite and middle-class consumption • As intellectual practice

  9. Fruitful approach- address conflictual & divergent agendas- global South • Liberal pluralism • In one hand, fail to adhere to familiar exclusivist modes of argument; deprecating who fail to share their propositions • On the other, indistinguishable from anarchism- collective action fail due to inability to agree • Extreme relativism

  10. Conclusion • Problem: multiple use and meanings; Northern research to have global relevance; • ‘rapid modernization as development’….???? Local communities to develop in their own conceptions • “Extreme postmodernism is unduly relativist and permissive, it may preclude any social contract or action and should rightly be rejected.”

More Related