1 / 14

MPHASIS 8 May 2009

MPHASIS 8 May 2009. Review of evidence from Belgium and preliminary findings of the “SILC-CUT” pilot survey. Prof Dr. Ides Nicaise & Sebastiano Cincinnato (HIVA-K.U.Leuven). Introduction. Extent and profile Flanders: SAW & Tellus Brussels: La Strada

alessa
Télécharger la présentation

MPHASIS 8 May 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MPHASIS 8 May 2009 Review of evidence from Belgium and preliminary findings of the “SILC-CUT” pilot survey Prof Dr. Ides Nicaise & Sebastiano Cincinnato (HIVA-K.U.Leuven)

  2. Introduction • Extent and profile • Flanders: SAW & Tellus • Brussels: La Strada • Wallonia: Associations des Maisons d’Accueil • SILC-CUT • General context & aim • Non-response in EU-SILC • Modifications questionnaire • Approach of target group • Experiences pilot-survey

  3. Scope and profile • Belgium (FEANTSA): • 17.000 roofless and homeless in 2003

  4. Scope and profile • Flanders - Extent (Resource Centre for General Social Work (SAW)): • 7.980 homeless people stayed in night shelters or reception centres • 2.335 received an ambulant form of assistance • 10.315 in total • Profile (Tellus customer registration system):

  5. Scope and profile • Brussels Capital Region (La Strada): • 2.766 home- and roofless people in 2008 • Minimum estimation • Heterogeneous group (mothers, undocumented migrants, drugs addicts,…) • Interesting findings: • Importance of negotiated squatting • Importance of stations as whereabouts • Importance of unrecognized shelters

  6. Scope and profile • Wallonia (Association of reception centres) • 18.000 people accomodated in 2006 • 55% adult men, 24% adult women, 19% children • Striking facts: • Increase number of children • Shortage of reception places (14.000 refusals) • Lengthening of the average duration of stay • Increased complexity (mental health problems)

  7. SILC-CUT: general context • EU-SILC (Stats on Income and Living Conditions): • Yearly panel survey on EU-level (since 2004) • Different themes: housing, income, social security, health(care), education,… • Poverty rate (15.2% in 2007) • Non- or underrepresentation of certain populations: • Itinerant population • Home- and roofless people (ETHOS) • Permanent campingsite residents • Undocumented migrants • Asylum seekers and regularized people • People in institutions (e.g. prison, homes) • Non- or underrepresentation especially due to: • Sampling (i.e. national register) • Non-response (i.e. non-contact and refusal)

  8. SILC-CUT: aim • Identification of non-represented populations • Estimation of the magnitude of those populations • Survey among specific groups: • Undocumented migrants • Home- and roofless • Non-response analysis of EU-SILC

  9. Non-response in the EU-SILC • Attrition EU-SILC 2004-2005 • Non-response prob.: • Age: higher for 25-34 years lower for >64 years (ref= 45-64 years) • Education: higher among low educated (ref=high education) • Household type: lower for couples with kids lower for single parents (ref=couples no kids) • Region: higher in Brussels lower in Flanders (ref=Wallonia) • # incomes from work: larger for households with no income (ref=2 or more)

  10. Modifications to EU-SILC questionnaire • Income: • Amount • Regularity • (subj.) adequacy • Source (work, social benefits, transfers, other) • Housing: • Reference address • Shelter or street • Access to sanitary • Modifications in housing situation

  11. Modifications to EU-SILC questionnaire • Health and access to healthcare: • Physical and mental health • Healthcare history and access • Alcohol and drug abuse • Daily activities: • Employed or unemployed • Type of work • Wage • Duration unemployment • Obstacles

  12. Reaching out to the target group • Three lines of approach: • Shelters • Reception centres (Inloopcentra) • Streetworkers

  13. Pilot survey SILC-CUT • Evaluation of selection procedure • 11 through shelters, 4 through inloopcentra • 13 men, 2 women • 18-35 years= 3; 36-50 years= 9; 51-65 years= 3 • Cooperation with organisations: • Overall positive • Points of interest: • Democratic decision process • Compensation for organisations • Compensation • 30€ • Point of interest: • Agreement with organisation

  14. Pilot survey SILC-CUT • Evaluation of questionnaire • Positive (participation and completion) • Points of interest: • Language • Sensitivity/threat • Income, housing

More Related