270 likes | 388 Vues
This paper discusses the European greenhouse gas (GHG) balance utilizing both bottom-up and top-down approaches. It highlights the similarities in gross primary productivity (GPP) at the canopy level and examines the carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes. Key findings indicate that while grassland sinks may increase, the forest biomass sink in Eastern Europe is not secure. Overall, the GHG balance for EU-25 is found to be zero, emphasizing the need to consider the nitrogen cycle alongside carbon cycling in environmental studies.
E N D
Kutsch, Rebmann, unpublished
at canopy level GPP is very similar Janssens, Ciais, Luyssaert and Schulze, unpublished
grassland > forest Janssens, Ciais, Luyssaert and Schulze, unpublished
other GHGs • balance the grassland sink • increase cropland losses Janssens, Ciais, Luyssaert and Schulze, unpublished
forest biomass sink not secure Janssens, Ciais, Luyssaert and Schulze, unpublished
GHGs add 10% to GWP
ecosystems compensate 10% of fossil and other fluxes the N2O flux is as large as the forest sink
Conclusions • The GHG balance of EU-25 is zero • The Euopean GHG sink is located in eastern Europe • We cannot study the carbon cycle in isolation. We have to seriously take the N-cycle on board