1 / 44

Ecological Economics (part 1) Ch. 4: Direct use values

Ecological Economics (part 1) Ch. 4: Direct use values. Resources (The Goods). 4 categories of “Goods”. Commons Goods. Rival/Nonexcludable: Owned by society (or nobody), accessible to all Concept: “ Tragedy of the Commons ” ( Garrett Hardin : 1968 ). Science 2003 special issue.

alika-hays
Télécharger la présentation

Ecological Economics (part 1) Ch. 4: Direct use values

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ecological Economics (part 1)Ch. 4: Direct use values

  2. Resources (The Goods) • 4 categories of “Goods”

  3. Commons Goods • Rival/Nonexcludable: Owned by society (or nobody), accessible to all • Concept: “Tragedy of the Commons” (Garrett Hardin: 1968) Science 2003 special issue

  4. Tragedy of the Commons

  5. Tragedy of the Commons: Marine Systems Who am I (lecture #1)? Interested? See pdf on class webpage about deep sea fishery sustainability

  6. Tragedy of the CommonsSolutions • 1) economic: pay for use/damage, regulations • How? Taxes/fees/laws: government involvement! • 2) ethics: restrain self-interest (Ch. 6)

  7. Environmental Impact Assessments • Estimate current/future environmental effects of project • Type Cost-Benefit Analysis: costs and benefits compared Challenges….

  8. Environmental Impact Assessments • Challenges • 1) Predict future economic conditions, value of resources • 2) Subsidies (incentives, support programs, tax breaks) • May not be included (perverse subsidies: harm both economy and environment)

  9. New Approach:Precautionary Principle • 1) If harm may result, delay until new information • 2) Burden of proof: those proposing activity show it’s harmless Ex: Hg pollution

  10. Indices of Economic Productivity What am I? ??

  11. Indices of Economic Productivity • GDP=Gross Domestic Product • Traditional measure productivity • Problem: Exxon Valdez oil spill (Alaska 1989) • Net economic gain to GDP!

  12. Suggestion: New Index • Ex 1: Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) • Includes environmental damage • U.S.: 1986-1994 as decline (GDP showed growth)

  13. Suggestion: New Index • Ex 2: Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI) • Includes environmental health • Question: Can country be sustainable and economically competitive? (Fig. 4.2)

  14. Suggestion: New Index • New ideas still being developed.

  15. Types of Economic Value of Resources

  16. Economic Value of Resources • Direct use value: products harvested by people (private goods)

  17. Economic Value of Resources • Direct use value: products harvested by people (private goods) • Indirect use value (Ch. 5): benefits to society from resources when not harvested • Option value (Ch. 5): possible future benefits to society • Existence value (Ch. 5): $ value assigned to biodiversity (perhaps by conservation groups)

  18. Types of Economic Value Rare species webpage Economic Value connection….. Fig. 4.3

  19. Direct Use Value • Harvested Goods (Rivalrous). Includes: • 1) Consumptive use value: consumed locally • 2) Productive use value: sold in markets

  20. Consumptive Use • Not in GDP! • Exs.: • 80% people: traditional medicines • Protein: “bush meat” in Africa • Fuelwood/dung energy (33% people)

  21. Consumptive Use Value • How assign value? • 1) Estimate cost if sold (use productive use value) • 2) Estimate cost to replace in market (substitute cost approach) • Problematic…

  22. Productive Use Value • Sold nationally/internationally (shows in GDP) • Problem: how assign value? • First point of sale? Finished product? • Ex: bark wild cascara (laxative) • Bark sold for $1 million • Final product sold for $75 million

  23. Productive Use Value • Importance? • 4.5% U.S. GDP (wild species) • $630 billion (2008)

  24. Ecological economics (part 2)Ch. 5: Non-direct values

  25. Economic value of biodiversity • Direct use value: consumptive and productive use values (Ch. 4) • Indirect use value: or non-consumptive use value. • Option value: possible future benefits to society • Existence value: value to those wishing to save species/habitat.

  26. Indirect use value • “Ecosystem services (4):” • 1) Provisioning: water, energy (food: direct use) • 2) Regulating: climate/flood control, waste processing • 3) Supporting: foundation all ecosystems • 4) Cultural: spiritual, educational, recreational Fig. 5.1

  27. 1: Provisioning • Watershed value: • New York City spent $1.5 billion (1980s) to protect watersheds (reservoirs) • Filtration plants: would cost $8-9 billion

  28. 2: Regulating • Wetlands: Buffering storm impacts • Textbook Box 5.1: Prophecy Fulfilled • Katrina cost $100-200 billion! Hurricane Katrina Aug. 29, 2005

  29. 2: Regulating • Local climate: • Trees: shade, evaporative cooling, absorb air pollution. Helps “heat island” effect • Ex, Atlanta: 5-8 F > surroundings • Urban deforestation: Loss tree cover (cities) • Ex: tree cover Chicago & Philadelphia <20%

  30. 2: Regulating • Larger scale: • Forests (transpiration: evaporation water from leaves) • Deforestation: tropical cloud forests drier if lowland forests cleared Deforested moisture Forested moisture Cloud forest

  31. 2: Regulating • Processing nutrients • Ex, New York Bight (Hudson River) • Sewage 20 million people • $ billions to replace

  32. 3: Supporting • Humans harvest (or waste) 50% terrestrial productivity (25% global)! • Supports direct use value Geoduck clam!

  33. 3: Supporting • Biodiversity & ecosystem function • How much richness decrease before declines? 2012 article: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity (Nature 486: 59-67)

  34. 3: Supporting • Ex, Biotic pollination mutualism • Native pollinators worth $20-40 billion/yr (U.S.) • 150 food crops Who am I? Solitary bees Bee crops

  35. 3: Supporting • Ex, Biotic pollination • Ex, blueberries (Alabama). Southeastern blueberry bee: 1 bee pollinates $75 worth berries (visits 50,000 flowers/yr). SE blueberry bee on the job!!

  36. 4: Cultural • “Amenity value”: Economic activity to enjoy nature • U.S. parks: $4 billion/yr! • Ecotourism: tourism to experience biodiversity

  37. Ecotourism • Important developed countries (Text Box 4.1) • Developing countries: • 1) protect natural areas • 2) improve life

  38. Ecotourism Dangers • 1) Little money to developing area • 60-80% $ stays in developed country • 0.01-1%: fees to native parks • 2) Tourist use can harm area/species

  39. 4: Cultural • Nature as intellectual content: books! The Boyd Book: Available for just $160 (postpaid!)

  40. 4: Cultural • TV/radio shows • Classroom materials Steve Irwin (Crikey!)

  41. Value of Intact Systems: $ Examples • Ecological economics: August 2002 (Science) • Searched 300 economic case studies • Intact (indirect use + consumptive use) value vs. productive use value

  42. Value of Intact Systems • Ex 1: Tropical Forest, Malaysia • Conventional logging $10,000/ha • Reduced-impact logging $11,200/ha • Intact forest $13,000/ha • Watershed value, harvest renewable products Sundaland!

  43. Value of Intact Systems • Ex 2: Coastal mangrove forest, Thailand • Shrimp farming $16,700/ha • Intact forest $60,400/ha • Storm protection, fisheries value major factors Indo-Burma!

  44. Value of Intact Systems • Ex 3: Freshwater marsh, Canada • Drained & farmed $3,700/ha • Intact $8,800/ha • Hunting, fishing, trapping important.

More Related