1 / 22

Effects of visualizing participation in CSCL

ICO Toogdag 2005. Effects of visualizing participation in CSCL. Jeroen Janssen, Jos Jaspers, Marcel Broeken, Gijsbert Erkens & Gellof Kanselaar Utrecht University. Overview presentation. ICO Toogdag 2005. 2. Participation problems during CSCL Solution: Visualization of participation

alika-hays
Télécharger la présentation

Effects of visualizing participation in CSCL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICO Toogdag 2005 Effects of visualizing participation in CSCL Jeroen Janssen, Jos Jaspers, Marcel Broeken, Gijsbert Erkens & Gellof Kanselaar Utrecht University

  2. Overview presentation ICO Toogdag 2005 2 • Participation problems during CSCL • Solution: Visualization of participation • Operationalization: Participation Tool • Research questions and method • Results • Conclusion and discussion • Future research and work in progress

  3. Participation problems during CSCL • When students are collaborating using CSCL, • sometimes: • Participation is low • Participation is unequal (free riders) ICO Toogdag 2005 3

  4. Solution:Visualization of participation? ICO Toogdag 2005 4 • Visualizes group member’s contribution to online communication • Makes contribution of group members to group processes identifiable • May enhance motivation to participate • May raise awareness of group processes and activities • Can be used to evaluate group processes (group processing)

  5. Operationalization: Participation Tool ICO Toogdag 2005 5

  6. 6 ICO Toogdag 2005

  7. 7 Group of students Students Distance: Number of messages Size: Length of the messages ICO Toogdag 2005

  8. Research questions ICO Toogdag 2005 8 • Does the Participation Tool (PT) influence: • Participation and equality of participation? • Awareness of group processes and activities? • Students’ collaborative activities?

  9. Method ICO Toogdag 2005 9 • 69 students, 5th year secondary education (pre-university track) • Subject: History • Task: Inquiry group task on “Witchcraft and persecution of witches” • Duration: 8 lessons • 51 students (=17 groups) with PT vs. 15 students (=5 groups) without PT • Group size: 3 or 4 students

  10. Participation ICO Toogdag 2005 10

  11. Equality of participation ICO Toogdag 2005 11

  12. Awareness of group processes and activities ICO Toogdag 2005 12 • Difference: Students with access to PT indicate they knew better when a group member was not working hard, t(21) = 2.43, p = .01.

  13. Collaborative activities ICO Toogdag 2005 13 • Coding scheme was developed to examine collaborative activities during CSCL • 4 main dimensions: • Performance of task-related activities • Regulation of task-related activities • Performance of social activities • Regulation of social activities • Technical, other/nonsense

  14. Collaborative activities ICO Toogdag 2005 14

  15. Collaborative activities ICO Toogdag 2005 15 • Most frequent: • Mutual understanding: 22% • Planning task-related activities: 19% • Monitoring task-related activities: 13% • Information exchange: 9% • Social support: 7%

  16. Collaborative activities ICO Toogdag 2005 16 • Students with access to the PT: • More greetings: t(21)=1.89, p=.04 • Less social support remarks: t(21)=-3.71, p=.00 • Less social resistance remarks: t(21)=-2.84, p=.00 • More planning of social activities: t(21)=2.46, p= .01 • Less nonsense activities: t(21)=-2.82, p=.01

  17. Conclusions ICO Toogdag 2005 17 • Visualization of participation increases participation (typing more long messages) • Visualization of participation influences awareness of group processes and activities (knowing when someone is a free rider) • Visualization of participation increases planning of social activities and greetings • Visualization of participation decreases social support, social resistance and nonsense remarks

  18. Discussion ICO Toogdag 2005 18 • Participation increase not due to increase in nonsense messages • Small number of students and groups • Influence of group composition and size

  19. Future research and work in progress ICO Toogdag 2005 19 • New visualization tool added to CSCL-environment: Shared Space • Visualizes group agreement or discussion during online communication • Replaces Chat tool

  20. Shared Space ICO Toogdag 2005 20

  21. Second experiment ICO Toogdag 2005 21 • Carried out in september/october 2005 • N=115, 20 groups with SS, 20 groups without • Do students with SS: • have different, more critical group norms? • perceive their collaboration and communication differently? • collaborate differently? • obtain higher scores on a group task? • perform better on a knowledge post-test?

  22. Questions???? ICO Toogdag 2005 22 Website: http://edugate.fss.uu.nl/~crocicl/ E-mail: j.j.h.m.janssen@fss.uu.nl

More Related