1 / 24

G  Love

G  Love. Kristin Brodie Jeff Colton Colin Galbraith Bushra Makiya Tiffany Santos. Objective. To create a glove that will generate heat to help keep your hand warm in a cold environment. What will this require? Source of heat generation How will they be different? Lightweight

allayna
Télécharger la présentation

G  Love

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLove Kristin Brodie Jeff Colton Colin Galbraith Bushra Makiya Tiffany Santos

  2. Objective To create a glove that will generate heat to help keep your hand warm in a cold environment What will this require? • Source of heat generation How will they be different? • Lightweight • Re-usable • Smart • Temperature Sensor/Switch • Reversible Exothermic Material

  3. Heat Loss Model Conduction • Cylindrical Hand • Power Lost @ -10C relative to Power Lost @ 25C • 2rLq = 2L(T1-T3)/R = 2.5W • R = Fabric Resistance + BL Resistance Glove Layers Convection

  4. Overview

  5. Battery Operated Glove

  6. Wires

  7. Mechanical Testing Data

  8. Electrical Resistivity Testing All wire diameters are ~40mm *R for wire wrapped around a finger **R for wire after work-hardening

  9. Wire Insulators Teflon Tubing Nextel Braids

  10. Batteries • Amphr • Size • Durability • Recharge ability

  11. Field Testing My hand feels warm, stop recording At what temperature is your hand comfortable? Tested 10 subjects • Placed in freezer • Dressed in winter clothes • Wore gloves with heating element • 1.7W of power supplied • Temp recorded when subject said their hand was warm Conclusion • Thermal Switch should turn power off at ~32C

  12. Temperature Sensor/Switch Resistance/Current Testing PICTURE HERE

  13. Fabric Blends of Polyester/Cotton were tested Thermal Testing • Input Power = 1.73 W • 100cm of wire • 3.7V • Temperature inside and outside of glove measured 2rLq=2L(T1-T3)/R = 1.73 W L/R = 0.018 W/k Power required using 100P* under same conditions as slide 3: 4.95 W

  14. Phase Change Materials • Octadecane • Tm = 27.2° C • Tc = 16.5° C • Hc = 283.5 J/g • Hydrophobic • Soft, waxy material • Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) • Tm = 26.6° C • Tc = 9.8° C • Hc = 151.0 J/g • Extremely hydrophilic • Soft, waxy material

  15. Differential Scanning Calorimetery

  16. PCM Encapsulation • To prevent leakage from glove when PCM melts. • Ideal Process • Microspheres to maximize surface area • Polypropylene (PP) /High Density Polyethylene (PE) • Can be used to encapsulate microspheres • Can be drawn into fibers • Extrusion of PEG/PP: phase separation • Complications • Lack of Encapsulation Facilities • Lack of Extrusion Facilities • Different thermal properties of PEG and PE

  17. Microsphere Fabrication • Successfully produced both paraffin and octadecane microspheres. • Complications • Inefficiency of filtering process • Large scale production

  18. PCM Encapsulation • Octadecane • Ground particles embedded in base material. • Polydimethyl Siloxane (PDMS) Resin • Thermal conductivity = 0.002W/m*K • 5g octadecane in 10ml (~7.5g) PDMS • PEG • Melting attempts failed. • Heat sealed in bags. • Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) • Thermal conductivity = 0.33W/m*K • 7g of PEG in ~11g LDPE -(CH2-CH2)-

  19. Comparison of PCMs Octadecane in PDMS PEG in PE Potential Heat: 2.36 J Actual Heat: 1.16 J Reduction in Efficiency: 51% Potential Heat: 0.66 J Actual Heat: 0.43 J Reduction in Efficiency: 35%

  20. PCM Conclusions • Octadecane is more efficient than PEG. • Polyethylene is more efficient than PDMS. • Future Recommendations • Encapsulate octadecane in polyethylene. • Extrusion

  21. Wire P = V2/R V = 3.74V, R = 8.3 1.7 W for 156 min Octadecane 5 g 1417 J 1.7 W for 12.5 min PEG 7 g 1057 J 1.7 W for 9.4 min Power Generated

  22. Battery Powered Octadecane PEG Field Testing

  23. Assembly • Connect wires to temp switch • Connecting wires to battery • Mechanical Strengthening of Contacts • Discharge battery • Encapsulation of PCM • Fabrication of Gloves

  24. Future Work • Improvements • Encapsulation process • Incorporation of wire into glove • Ease of access to recharge battery • On/Off switch • Insulation of Wire

More Related