1 / 16

LING 364: Introduction to Formal Semantics

LING 364: Introduction to Formal Semantics. Lecture 14 February 28th. Administrivia. Reminders Homework 3 due Thursday hope you all have attempted it email (midnight deadline) Thursday’s Class Computer Lab classroom confirmed 3:30pm – 4:45pm

allie
Télécharger la présentation

LING 364: Introduction to Formal Semantics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LING 364: Introduction to Formal Semantics Lecture 14 February 28th

  2. Administrivia • Reminders • Homework 3 • due Thursday • hope you all have attempted it • email (midnight deadline) • Thursday’s Class • Computer Lab classroom confirmed • 3:30pm – 4:45pm • come prepared with non-working Homework 3 grammars etc. so I can help you

  3. Today’s Class • Back to theory today... • [A course objective: to work on theory and practice with formal theories in parallel.]

  4. Last Time • Last time... actually two lectures ago... • Chapter 4: Modifiers • Adjectives • Intersective model (see also Homework 3) • view predicates as representing sets • (1) Ossie is a bird ossie ∈ {..set of all birds..} • (2) Ossie is tall ossie ∈ {..set of all tall things..} • (3) Ossie is a tall bird • ossie ∈ {..set of all birds..} ∩ {..set of all tall things..} set membership set intersection

  5. Last Time • Adjectives • Problems with the intersective model • not every adjective falls neatly into this framework • Ossie ∈ {..set of all birds..} ∩ {..set of all tall things..} • “tall bird” perhaps more precisely means “tall for a bird” • Ossie is a bird & Ossie is taller_than bird average • cf. Ossie is a dead bird • Ossie ∈ {..set of all birds..} ∩ {..set of all dead things..} • cf. former teacher • does “former” have an intersective interpretation?

  6. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4 Adverbs • traditionally • adjectives modify nouns • adverbs modify verbs • example: • (6) Shelby barked loudly adverbial modification • event(e,barking), agent(e,shelby), loud(e). • (6’) Shelby is loud adjectival modification • loud(shelby). • is there an “event” here?

  7. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4 Adverbs • further modification (e.g. time and place) • examples: • (7) Yesterday, Shelby barked in the backyard • event(e,barking), agent(e,shelby), place(e,backyard), time(e,yesterday). • (7’) Yesterday, Shelby barked loudlyin the backyard • event(e,barking), agent(e,shelby), loud(e), place(e,backyard), time(e,yesterday).

  8. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4 Adverbs • example: (subject oriented) • (8a) John intentionally met Mary • event(e,meeting), participant(e,john), participant(e,mary), intentional(e). • more correctly? • event(e,meeting), participant(e,john), participant(e,mary), intended/caused(e,john).

  9. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4 Adverbs • example: (object oriented) • (8b) John chopped the onion finely • event(e,chopping), agent(e,john), patient(e,onion), fine(e). • resultative interpretation • event(e,chopping), agent(e,john), patient(e,onion), transformed(e,onion,pieces), fine(pieces).

  10. Chapter 4: Modifiers • Another example (not in handout): • John hammered the nail • John hammered the nail nude • John hammered the nail flat how would you express the conjunction of these two statements? • ?John hammered the nail flat nude • *John hammered the nail nude flat

  11. Chapter 4: Modifiers • Another example (not in handout): • John hammered the nail • event(e,hammering), agent(e,john), patient(e,nail). • John hammered the nail nude • event(e,hammering), agent(e,john), patient(e,nail), nude(john). • (what’s does this fail to capture?) • John hammered the nail flat • event(e,hammering), agent(e,john), patient(e,nail), result(e,flat(nail)). (informally)

  12. Chapter 4: Modifiers • Another example (not in handout): • John hammered the nail flat nude • event(e,hammering), agent(e,john), patient(e,nail), result(e,flat(nail)), nude(e,john).

  13. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4 Adverbs • example: (speaker oriented) • (8c) Surprisingly, John cried • event(e,crying), agent(e,john), surprising(e,speaker).

  14. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4.2 Adverbs without events • view them as properties of individuals • earlier example: • (6) Shelby barked loudly • Phrase Set-theoretic view • bark {..individuals who bark..} • bark loudly subset of {..individuals who bark..} “barkers” implementation idea: loudly could be a function that maps a property onto another property loud

  15. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4.2 Adverbs without events • view them as relation mappers • earlier example: • (8b) John chopped the onions finely • Phrase Relational view • chop chop(X,Y). • finely takes a relation, picks out its 2nd argument, • adds result: (2nd argument) is in fine pieces • chop(X,Y). • ➨ • chop(X,Y), become(Y,fine_pieces).

  16. Chapter 4: Modifiers • 4.4.2 Adverbs without events • view them as proposition mappers • earlier example: • (8) Surprisingly, John cried • Phrase Propositional view • cry cry(X). • John cried cried(john). • surprisingly takes a proposition, produces a complex proposition, • adding a statement about the truth of the proposition • cried(john). • ➨ • cried(john), surprising(cried(john),speaker).

More Related