The Emergence of Everything(?)

1. The Emergence of Everything(?) Alan Baker Philosophy, Swarthmore College Dec 2nd 2003

3. What is emergence?

4. 3 basic approaches; (to clarifying a concept, F) (i) Formulate a definition of F. (ii) Give examples where F applies. (iii) Claim that no clarification of F is possible (and/or desirable).

5. Types of definition: (a) Stipulative (b) Lexical (c) Precising (d) Theoretical

6. stipulative definition The arbitrary assignment of meaning to a term not previously in use.

7. lexical definition A faithful report of the way in which a term is used within a particular language-community. (cf. ‘historico-lexical’)

8. precising definition A careful effort to reduce the vagueness of a term by stipulating features not included in its lexical definition.

9. theoretical definition A proposal for understanding the meaning of a term in relation to a set of scientifically useful hypotheses.

10. (i) Vacuousness: a concept, F, is vacuous if nothing is F (ii) Triviality: a concept, F, is trivial if everything is F (iii) Vicious Circularity / Self-Reference: a concept F which applies or refers to itself in a paradoxical way

11. The Emergence of Everything: How the World Became Complex Harold J. Morowitz

12. (I) Overview (II) Defining emergence [Chapter 2] (III) Examples of emergence [Chapter 7] (IV) Emergence and Self-Reference [Chapter 31]

13. “[S]cientists have looked for ways of pruning the space of possible solutions or sets of allowable solutions. This may lead to surprises in the system trajectories, giving rise to novel behaviors. These are the emergent properties of the system, properties of the whole. They are novelties that follow from the system rules but cannot be predicted from properties of the components that make up the system.” (p. 13)

14. “[N]ature yields at every level novel structures and behaviors selected from the huge domain of the possible by pruning, which extracts the actual from the possible. The pruning rules are the least understood aspect of this approach to emergence, and understanding them will be a major feature of the science of the future.” (p. 14)

15. “[The computational approach is] to select solutions or families of solutions by fitness rules or other selection criteria often defined by introducing pruning algorithms. Theories of this kind are successful if the … solutions generated under the constraint of rules and pruning lead to behaviors with some kind of agreement or resonance with the world of observation. Such outputs are called emergent properties of the system.” (p. 19)“[T]he notion of metaphor sometimes replaces agreement.” (p. 20)

16. “[Selection rules] may lead to a whole which is different from the sum of the parts, i.e. the behavior of the agents leads to system properties not knowable without running the program.” (p. 20)In such cases “the whole is more than the sum of the parts.” [J. Holland; Pope John Paul II]“Curiously, these identical words … occur in the scientific treatise and papal discourse. This seems to speak volumes to the range of the ideas in emergence.” (p. 20)

17. Chapter 7: The Periodic Table “The pruning relations that severely limit the eigen states (allowable atomic configurations) of matter are the solutions to the Schrödinger equation and the Pauli exclusion principle. The emergent behavior is the content of the science of chemistry: the periodic table of the elements, the rules of covalent bonding, etc.” (p. 55)

18. The Pauli Exclusion Principle [PEP] No two electrons in an atom can have the same four quantum numbers. More generally, functions representing states of two electrons must be antisymmetric.

19. Morowitz’s Three Claims (pp. 55-6) (i) PEP is a nondynamical principle, but it influences the dynamical behavior of electrons. (ii) PEP has nothing to say about the behavior of individual electrons. (iii) PEP is unrelated to the other laws of physics.

20. Chapter 31: Philosophy Circularity Self-Reference Paradox

21. “In the emergence approach, we have operated in a circular fashion. … [W]e have started with the mind … and have built a universe of constructs that are then used in an effort to try to understand the mind.” (p. 173) “Emergence has in an orderly way moved from protons to philosophers. At this level there is a kind of closing of the loop. … The emerging world turns inwards and thinks about itself.” (pp. 183-4)