1 / 21

Energy efficient radio resource management strategies for green radio

Energy efficient radio resource management strategies for green radio. IET Commun ., 2011, Vol.5, Iss . 18. 2012-03-08 TRINH XUAN DAT. Contents. Introduction System model Energy-aware link adaptation Energy efficiency of SISO and MIMO Proposed MAPR and performance evaluation

alyssa-edwards
Télécharger la présentation

Energy efficient radio resource management strategies for green radio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Energy efficient radio resource management strategies for green radio IET Commun., 2011, Vol.5, Iss. 18 2012-03-08 TRINH XUAN DAT

  2. Contents • Introduction • System model • Energy-aware link adaptation • Energy efficiency of SISO and MIMO • Proposed MAPR and performance evaluation • Conclusion

  3. 1. Introduction • Green radio: environmentally friendly, low-power and energy efficient solutions for future wireless networks • Link adaptation RRM strategies select Tx parameters according to current channel conditions

  4. Introduction (cont.’) • Low order scheme generally requires less Tx power to maintain a specific quality requirement  LA energy-aware RRM strategies can help to improve energy efficiency by selecting the most energy-saving Tx mode according to current channel conditions • The opportunity to trade off bandwidth for saving energy: allocate free bandwidth to users and allow them to transmit in low spectral efficient modes while maintaining the target data rate

  5. 2. System model • Channel model: spatial channel model extension (SCME) urban macro-scenario

  6. 3. Energy-aware link adaptation • Performance of MCS schemes and overall system of SISO LTE in the SCME channel

  7. 3. Energy-aware link adaptation • The amount of energy saving achieved by a LA scheme is calculated by energy reduction gain (ERG): • ERCREF: energy consumption rate (ERC) of the reference system with Tx power @46dBm • ERCTEST(LA): ERC of the considered system operating at whatever Tx power to match the reference system

  8. Energy-aware link adaptation • Energy consumption rate (ERC) is given by: • P: required average transmit power • R: data rate • T: transmission time over which ERC is calculated • Performance of transmit ERG under various user locations and fixed data rate:

  9. 4. Energy efficiency of SISO and MIMO • Compare energy efficiency of SISO, Alamouti-based space-frequency block coding (SFBC) used in LTE and spatial multiplexing (SM): • Energy consumption for fixed rate requirement, w/o consideration of overhead:

  10. Energy efficiency of SISO and MIMO • Energy consumption for varying traffic load, w/o consideration of overhead:

  11. Energy efficiency of SISO and MIMO • Energy consumption with consideration of overhead:

  12. 5. MRPA scheme • Assumption: overall system traffic is not fully loaded • The proposed Adaptive multi-user resource and power allocation (MRPA) scheme: to minimize total Tx power PT subject to a given user’s rate requirement:

  13. MRPA scheme • Two stages of MRPA: • Stage 1: • Assigns min number of PRBs to meet users’ rate requirement, using the most spectrally efficiency MCS level. Users are assigned PRBs with highest channel gain • Calculate required Tx power of each user Pk • Stage 2: “bandwidth scaling stage” • Find users that are not currently assigned the lowest MSC level • Find user k* that achieves the highest positive power reduction by using a lower MSC scheme through bandwidth expansion until all PRBs are assigned to users

  14. MRPA example • Example of assigning PRBs to users based on MRPA:

  15. Performance evaluation • Compared RRM schemes: • Scheme 1 (used by reference system): fixed scheduling approach – all users transmit at highest MCS level, PRBs are assigned on round-robin approach  not all PRBs are use for transmission • Scheme 2 (“bandwidth expansion” only): all PRBs are assigned to users based on round-robin method • Scheme 3 (multi-user diversity, MUD, only): users transmit at highest MCS level but select best PRBs for transmission

  16. Performance evaluation • Simulation environment: • BS peak Tx rate 43.2Mbps • 5 users: • Distributed uniformly • Each user requests 20% of the overall system load simultaneously • Max range between BS and MS is 300m

  17. Simulation results • In SISO system:

  18. Simulation results • In SISO system:

  19. Simulation results • In MIMO system:

  20. Conclusion • For specified rate requirement, using energy-oriented LA strategy allows system to adapt the most energy efficient MCS to current user’s channel condition to reduce transmission power • Low spectral efficient MCS scheme with low modulation order and stronger coding rate is more energy efficient • The proposed algorithm shows 79%~86% energy reduction • MIMO is more energy efficient than SISO for the same spectral efficiency requirement

  21. Q&A

More Related