Download
1 / 19
220 likes | 444 Vues
Physical Evidence. Chapter 3. Physical Evidence. It would be impossible to list all the objects that could conceivably be of importance to a crime. Almost anything can be Physical Evidence.
E N D
Physical Evidence Chapter 3
Physical Evidence • It would be impossible to list all the objects that could conceivably be of importance to a crime. • Almost anything can be Physical Evidence. • Although you cannot rely on a list of categories, it is useful to discuss some of the most common types of physical evidence. • The purpose of recognizing physical evidence is so that it can be collected and analyzed.
It is difficult to ascertain the weight a given piece of evidence will have in a case as ultimately the weight will be decided by a jury. • The examination of physical evidence by a forensic scientist is usually undertaken for identification or comparison purposes. • Identification has, as its purpose, the determination of the physical or chemical identity of a substance with as near absolute certainty as existing analytical techniques will permit. • A comparison analysissubjects a suspect specimen and a standard/reference specimen to the same tests and examinations for the ultimate purpose of determining whether or not they have a common origin.
Types of Physical Evidence • Blood, semen, and saliva (aka Biologicals) • Documents • Drugs • Explosives • Fibers • Fingerprints • Firearms and ammunition • Glass • Hair • Impressions • Organs and physiological fluids • Paint • Petroleum products • Plastic bags • Plastic, rubber, and other polymers • Powder residues • Soil and minerals • Tool marks • Vehicle lights • Wood and other vegetative matter
Identification • The object of an identification is to determine the physical or chemical identity with as near absolute certainty as existing analytical techniques will permit. • The process of identification first requires the adoption of testing procedures that give characteristic results for specific standard materials. Once these test results have been established, they may be permanently recorded and used repeatedly to prove the identity of suspect materials. Second, identification requires that the number and type of tests needed to identify a substance be sufficient to exclude all other substances.
Common Types of Identification • The crime laboratory is frequently requested to identify the chemical composition of an illicit drug. • It may be asked to identify gasoline in residues recovered from the debris of a fire, or it may have to identify the nature of explosive residues—for example, dynamite or TNT. • The identification of blood, semen, hair, or wood are also very common and, as a matter of routine, include a determination for species origin.
Comparison • A comparative analysis has the important role of determining whether or not a suspect specimen and a standard/reference specimen have a common origin. • Both the standard/reference and the suspect specimen are subject to the same tests. • The forensic comparison is actually a two-step procedure. • First, combinations of select properties are chosen from the suspect and the standard/reference specimen for comparison. • Second, once the examination has been completed, the forensic scientist must be prepared to render a conclusion with respect to the origins.
Classifying Characteristics • Individual Characteristics Evidence that can be associated to a common source with an extremely high degree of probability is said to possess individual characteristics. • In all cases, it is not possible to state with mathematical exactness the probability that the specimens are of common origin. • It can only be concluded that this probability is so high as to defy mathematical calculations or human comprehension.
Examples of Individual Characteristics • the matching ridge characteristics of two fingerprints • the comparison of random striation markings on bullets or tool marks • the comparison of irregular and random wear patterns in tire or footwear impressions • the comparison of handwriting characteristics • the fitting together of the irregular edges of broken objects in the manner of a jigsaw puzzle • matching sequentially made plastic bags by striation marks running across the bags
Class Characteristics • Evidence associated only with a group is said to have class characteristics. • Surprising to the inexperienced forensic scientist is the frequent inability of the laboratory to relate physical evidence to a common origin with a high degree of certainty. • Evidence is said to possess class characteristics when it can be associatedonly with a group and never with a single source. • Nevertheless, the high diversity of class evidence in our environment makes their comparison very significant in the context of a criminal investigation.
Class Evidence • One of the current weaknesses of forensic science is the inability of the examiner to assign exact or even approximate probability values to the comparison of most class physical evidence. • There are very few statistical data available from which to derive this information, and in a mass-produced world, gathering this kind of data is increasingly elusive. • One of the primary endeavors of forensic scientists must be to create and update statistical databases for evaluating the significance of class physical evidence.
Most items of physical evidence retrieved at crime scenes cannot be linked definitively to a single person or object. • The value of class physical evidence lies in its ability to provide corroboration of events with data that are, as nearly as possible, free of human error and bias. • The chances are low of encountering two indistinguishable items of physical evidence at a crime scene that actually originated from different sources. • When one is dealing with more than one type of class evidence, their collective presence may lead to an extremely high certainty that they originated from the same source. • Finally, the contribution of physical evidence is ultimately determined in the courtroom.
Natural vs. Evidential Limits • There are practical limits to the properties and characteristics the forensic scientist can select for comparison. Modern analytical techniques have become so sophisticated and sensitive that natural variations in objects become almost infinite. Carrying natural variations to the extreme, no two things in this world are alike in every detail. Evidential variations are not the same as natural variations. Distinguishing variations of evidential use from natural variations is not always an easy task.
Use of Physical Evidence • As the number of different objects linking an individual to a crime scene increases, so does the likelihood of that individual’s involvement with the crime. • Just as important, a person may be exonerated or excluded from suspicion if physical evidence collected at a crime scene is found to be different from standard/reference samples collected from that subject. • Databases are a integral part of analyzing physical evidence
Forensic Databases • TheIntegrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS), a national fingerprint and criminal history system maintained by the FBI. • The Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) enables federal, state, and local crime laboratories to electronically exchange and compare DNA profiles. • The National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN) allows firearm analysts to acquire, digitize, and compare markings made by a firearm on bullets and cartridge casings. • The International Forensic Automotive Paint Data Query (PDQ) database contains chemical and color information pertaining to original automotive paints. • SICAR (shoeprint image capture and retrieval)is a shoeprint database.
Crime Scene Reconstruction • The method used to support a likely sequence of events by the observation and evaluation of physical evidence, as well as statements made by those involved with the incident, is referred to as reconstruction.
Crime-scene reconstruction relies on the combined efforts of medical examiners, criminalists, and law enforcement personnel to recover physical evidence and to sort out the events surrounding the occurrence of a crime.
Summary • The physical evidence left behind at a crime scene plays a crucial role in reconstructing the events that took place surrounding the crime. • Although the evidence alone does not describe everything that happened, it can support or contradict accounts given by witnesses and/or suspects. • Information obtained from physical evidence can also generate leads and confirm the reconstruction of a crime to a jury. • The collection and documentation of physical evidence is the foundation of a reconstruction.
Reconstruction is a team effort that involves putting together many different pieces of a puzzle. • The right connections have to be made among all the parts involved so as to portray the relationship among the victim, the suspect, and the crime scene. • If successful, reconstruction can play a vital role in aiding a jury to arrive at an appropriate verdict. • The recognition, collection, and analysis of physical evidence is the foundation to successful reconstruction, but only part of the process.
