1 / 23

Alternatives Report

Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. SOSC 562/301E Sustainable Development (Fall 2006). Alternatives Report. “Low-rise Houses in Sai Kung Town ”. Instructor Prof. Jerry Patchell. Team members: IP Yi-po (06818966) Chan Yik-lai (04683329) Lai Chun-cheong (06816566).

amelia
Télécharger la présentation

Alternatives Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology SOSC 562/301E Sustainable Development (Fall 2006) Alternatives Report “Low-rise Houses in Sai Kung Town” Instructor Prof. Jerry Patchell Team members: IP Yi-po (06818966) Chan Yik-lai (04683329) Lai Chun-cheong (06816566)

  2. Introduction • Residential Buildings in SKT • Small Village House (<3 storey) • Low-rise Buildings (<15 storey) • High-rise Buildings (> 15 storey rare) • Methodology • Questionnaire • Sample Building

  3. Sai Kung Town Centre (西貢苑) • Building Age: 17 yrs • Storey: 7 • Block: 6 • Total tenement: 264 • Car park: around 400

  4. Stakeholders • Residents in Sai Kung Town Centre • Concerns: • Living Environment • Transportation • Saving Money • Energy Efficiency • Waste Management • Supporting Facilities

  5. Stakeholders (cont.) • Management Office: Eastpoint Property Management Limited (置邦物業管理公司) • Concerns: • Administration • Management • Businessman • Concerns: • Living Environment • Transportation • Supporting Facilities

  6. Stakeholders (cont.) • Government Departments: • Concerns: • Statutory Requirements • Environmental Friendly • Energy Efficiency • Waste Management

  7. Stakeholders (cont.) Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) • Concerns: • Living Environment • Energy Efficiency • Waste Management • Education • Resident Behaviors

  8. Issue and Gap Analysis • Biodiversity • Natural scene and Air quality issue(Compensate the environment) • Promote reserve green area(Conflict: Residents, Government, NGO) • Promote greening common area(Conflict: Residents, MO, Government) • Prohibit environmental unfriendly activities(Conflict: Residents, MO, Businessman, Government)

  9. Issue and Gap Analysis (cont. 1) • Energy • Energy consumption issue • Promote install energy saving system (Conflict: Residents, MO, EMSD, Businessman) • Energy saving in private area(Conflict: Residents) • Energy generation issue • Promote install solar panel / collector(Conflict: Residents, MO, EMSD)

  10. Issue and Gap Analysis (cont. 2) • Eco-cycle • Solid waste recycle/disposal issue • Promote separation of domestic waste(Conflict: Residents, EPD, MO) • Promote install waste treatment facilities(Conflict: Residents, EPD, MO, BD) • Old cloth collection(Conflict: Residents, MO, NGO) • Water consumption and wastewater issue • Promote save water • Domestic wastewater treatment fee(Conflict: Residents, EPD)

  11. Issue and Gap Analysis (cont. 3) • Mobility • Public transport issue • Propose environmental friendly fuel public vehicles(Conflict: Residents, EPD, Public Transport Companies) • Personal transport issue • Promote cycling(Conflict: Residents, MO, Government) • Propose environmental friendly fuel vehicles(Conflict: Residents, EPD, TD) • Traffic jam (in holiday) issue • Propose environmental friendly fuel vehicle only (Conflict: Residents, Visitors, Tourist, TD)

  12. Issue and Gap Analysis (cont. 4) • Society • Community health issue • Maintain healthy and clean environment (Conflict: Residents, FEHD) • Mass consumption issue • Reduce consumption of convenience food, once products(Conflict: Residents, Large chain store)

  13. Benchmarking: Case Study of Bo01 (City of Tomorrow) • A newly constructed urban district with about 600 apartments and a temporary exhibition for 2001 European Housing Expo • Located on waterfront inSweden’s Malmö city • Funding • Local government • National government • European Union • Public-private partnership

  14. Before: • polluted Industrial wasteland • Now: • International leading ecological area • sustainable city with residential buildings and some commercial offices

  15. Bo01 Sai Kung Town 1:1proportion Apartment: 600 Population: 1100 Floor: 3-5 Apartment: 1100 Population: 4000 Floor: 3-11

  16. Bo01: Environmental Approach • Ecological building • No hazardous materials • Built for users utilize in an environmentalfriendly and resource efficient way • Quality Programme • Biodiversity • Compensation for the natural area • Roofs and walls will be covered with plants • Rainwater and seawater is used in public spaces to support a broad range of species • Large trees and bushes area

  17. Bo01: Environmental Approach (cont. 1) • Energy • 100% renewable energy (sun, wind and water) • Balanced between production and energy use • Electricity from Sun (120m2 ofsolar cells produce electricity) • Electricity from Wind (largewind power station) • Heat from Water and Sun • Heat pump used for extracts heat from seawater • 1,400m2 of solar collectorscomplement with heat pump

  18. Bo01: Environmental Approach (cont. 2) • Eco-cycle • Recycling of water and resources • Recycling of wastes • Organic waste transformed to biogas • Household waste separated for recycling • Extract heat from Incineration process • Mobility system • Well cycling system • Public transportation systemwith environmentally-friendly fuels • Carpool system (Car sharing)

  19. Bo01: Environmental Approach (cont. 3) • Information technology • Monitoring the water and energy consumption status • Indicated the departure time for buses • The carpool of the district can bebooked on the home computer • Compare with Sweden’s normal houses in 2001 • The energy consumes less 20-31% • The water consumes less 10% • Construction material consumes less 10% • Construction material waste less 20%

  20. Alternatives Generations • Recycling • Separation of Domestic waste for Recovery and Disposal • Use Compress Machine to compress the Recyclable Wastes for easy storage • Energy Saving • Promotion of Electronics Products with Energy Efficiency Labeling Scheme with Environmental Friendly Materials • Install High Efficiency Lighting System • Install Occupancy Sensor Control in Lighting System

  21. Alternatives Generations (cont.) • Biodiversity • Greening in common/private areas for compensate the natural scene and improve air quality • Mobility • Use of public transport instead of private cars • Promote cycling • Propose environmental friendly fuel vehicles • Ecological Interior Decoration • Provide guidelines for residents and interior decoration companies

  22. Proposed Alternatives • Methodology • Questionnaires • Stakeholders • Feedback • Review

  23. Questions & Answer Section

More Related