1 / 25

K-20 Education Network Update for the NWESD Districts

K-20 Education Network Update for the NWESD Districts. May 9, 2013. Overview . K-20 Governance Changes/Audit Network Architecture Upgrade K-20 Connectivity Costs. K-20 Governance. Current Governance. Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)

amelie
Télécharger la présentation

K-20 Education Network Update for the NWESD Districts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. K-20 Education Network Updatefor theNWESD Districts May 9, 2013

  2. Overview • K-20 Governance Changes/Audit • Network Architecture Upgrade • K-20 Connectivity Costs

  3. K-20 Governance

  4. Current Governance Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) General operational and technical oversight to the K-20 Educational Network Consortium K-20 Educational Network Consortium General K-20 Operational and Technical Oversight K-20 Operations Cooperative (KOCO) K-20 Engineering & Day-to-Day Operations Provisioning Maintenance Operations Engineering Administration

  5. K-20 Operations Cooperative • UW KOCO • Monitor Network & Server Status • Troubleshoot Network Problems • Coordinate Problem Resolution • Provide and Analyze Network Performance Data • Provide Technical Support • SBCTC KOCO • Manage Video Switched Network and MCUs • Schedule Multipoint Video Resources • Provide Technical Support

  6. Network Architecture Upgrade

  7. 450 Sites Connected K-12 District/ESD (302) Community/Technical College (65) Public College/ University (33) Public Library (24) Telemedicine Site (5) Tribal Education Center/ Tribal College (11) Independent College/ University (7) TVW Olympia KCTS 9 Seattle Washington State Historical Society • Over 300 K-12 districts and Educational Service Districts • More than 2,000 K-12 schools and 57,000 classrooms • Over 1.5 million students

  8. Seattle Spokane Olympia Yakima Pullman Vancouver Statewide Fiber Optic Backbone(2005) Library School District University or College

  9. K-20 40 Gbps Network: Gen 3(2013)

  10. Current Node Site Architecture

  11. Future Node Site Architecture

  12. NoaNet Outages • Major NoaNet Outages over the past year • Most Recent: Yakima Area (60+ sites) • Vendor currently meeting contractual availability metrics • Initiated Design Review Early March • Cause: Noanet Cisco Switch Failure • New Design: Remove Noanet Single Point(s) of Failure

  13. Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees

  14. Internet Service Provider (ISP) Fees • K-20 is statewide INTRA-net • K-20 Network does not directly procure INTER-net access for customers • OSPI contracts for ISP on behalf of connected K-12 sites • No state subsidy for ISP • No legislatively set rate structure • Estimates provided by OSPI at beginning of year • Actual cost determined at end of year, based on actual, total cost of service • Includes E-rate discounts

  15. ISP Usage and Cost History for K-12

  16. ISP Cost per Megabit Billed to Endsites

  17. K-20 Connectivity Costs

  18. K-20 Co-pay Principles • Established by K-20 Network Consortium • All sites must pay the same amount per unit of transport – regardless of institution size, location, or connectivity methodology • Co-pay is amount needed from connected institutions after state subsidy and E-rate reimbursements • Must be in line with options available in competitive marketplace • Much lower than actual cost to provide service

  19. 2011 – 2013 K-20 Budget Federal E-rate 24% ($7.2M)

  20. K-20 Co-pay History • 1996: • When K-20 was established, co-pay was set based on cost of a T1 in downtown Seattle ($625/quarter) • 2005: • Co-pay revised to reflect increase in Ethernet availability, cheaper rural options • Moved to usage-based model; not capacity based • Co-pay set at $400/Mbps/quarter up to 6 Mbps; $60/Mbps/quarter beyond 6 • Only 25 sites had usage > 6 Mbps • 2012: • Co-pay revised again to address high bandwidth users • 228 sites now have usage > 6 Mbps • 59 sites now have usage > 50 Mbps

  21. 2012 Co-pay Review(presented to K-20 Network Consortium May 8, 2012) • Expenses have remained reasonably stable, in spite of increases in bandwidth utilization • Contributing Factors: • Removal of all ISDN video connections and many T1s • Installation of lower cost Ethernet connections • Transition of CTS KOCO responsibilities to UW • Increases in E-rate reimbursements (60% in 2000; 71% in 2012) • Usage has increased at approximately 50% per year • Transport expenses have not increased at the same rate • Without changes to co-pay model, sector co-pay invoices would increase at a greater rate than K-20 expenses • Co-pay rates for high bandwidth users are increasingly out of line with competitive marketplace

  22. Proposed Quarterly Co-pay Reduction(approved by K-20 Network Consortium May 8, 2012) $50/Mbps $40/Mbps $25/Mbps (currently 174 sites) (currently 34 sites) (currently 17 sites) $400/Mbps (currently 199 sites) Cost per Quarter 45 95 5 95th% usage (Mbps)

  23. Recent History • Over the past few months, some districts have indicated that they were paying more for K-20 than they could to other vendors • Some of these claims were easily addressed: • For high-bandwidth users, the new co-pay structure addressed this • In some cases, vendors and districts were basing these claims on outdated or inaccurate information • In others, it was determined to be true • K-20 and OSPI committed to districts that the co-pay would be reassessed, and any necessary changes made

  24. 2013 Co-pay Review • School Districts that qualify for high e-rate discounts (80% and above) may be paying more for co-pay than they would for the post-discountportion of competitive offerings (10 – 20% of the actual cost of service) • Current approach: • K-20 receives approximately $5M in e-rate reimbursements annually for circuits procured for K-12 and library sites • Co-pay for all sites is the same – regardless of sector or e-rate discount qualification • State appropriation currently subsidizes higher ed sites at a greater rate than K-12 and library sites, as E-rate provides much of the K-12 and library subsidy. • In order for co-pay to stay in line with competitive marketplace, and meet legislative intent, additional changes to co-pay must be made

  25. K-20 Contact Information Tom Carrolltomc@k20wa.org (360) 725-5102Susan Tenkhoffsusant@k20wa.org (360) 725-5103

More Related