1 / 24

Prospects for New Physics in

Prospects for New Physics in. b ⇄ s Phenomena and the Squark. November 19, 2004. b  sqq Penguin CPV. -. Belle @LP03 (140 fb -1 ). [PRL 91, 261602 (2003)]. B 0  f Ks. B 0  J/ y Ks etc. Different !!. sin2 f 1 =0.728  0.06. “ sin2 f 1 ”= - 0.96  0.51.

amish
Télécharger la présentation

Prospects for New Physics in

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Prospects for New Physicsin b ⇄ s Phenomena and the Squark November 19, 2004

  2. b  sqq Penguin CPV - Belle @LP03 (140 fb-1) [PRL 91, 261602 (2003)] B0fKs B0 J/yKsetc Different !! sin2f1=0.728  0.06 “sin2f1”= -0.96  0.51 3.5s deviation from the SM ! ICHEP 2004, Beijing

  3. 274M BB S = 0.736 fit B0f K0 : CPV Result f K0 Good tags Poor tags Good tags fKS+fKL:S(fK0) = +0.06 0.330.09 A(fK0) = +0.080.220.09 ~2.2s away from SM ICHEP 2004, Beijing

  4. VP, PP Anticorrelation Chua, WSH, Nagashima, PRL’04 submitted 9/03 N.B. SfKs< 0Is/Was Extreme George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  5. Two Nicer, Gentler Scenarios Post 2004 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  6. Results on sin2b from s-penguin modes 2.7s from s-penguin to sin2b (cc) 2.4s from s-penguin to sin2b (cc) Scenario 1 All new! All new! ~ 0.3 – 0.4 Marcello A. Giorgi

  7. Results on sin2b from s-penguin modes 2.7s from s-penguin to sin2b (cc) 2.4s from s-penguin to sin2b (cc) Scenario 2 All new! All new! ~ 0.7 – 0.8 eventually (?) ~ 0.45 Marcello A. Giorgi

  8. Level Splitting by Large sR-bR Mixing Drive One State Light strange-beauty squark (Approx. Abelian Flavor Symm.) 1 CP Phase s Focus on 200 GeV George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  9. NP CPV phase s~ 90°or 270° ~ 200 GeV Collider Direct Search ~ 500 GeV Model Upshot “Milder” 2004 results more interesting ! Two Particle System 7 Two Scenarios but need to disentangle hadronic effect Clean Modes @ Flavor Factory George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  10. Surviveb sg Rate Constraint 1, 0.5 TeV 2, 0.5 1, 0.65 TeV 2, 0.65 1, 0.8 TeV 2, 0.8 [ 700 - 800 GeV More Conservative ] s ≲ p/2, ors ≳ 3p/2 s ~ p: LR Chiral Enhancement George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  11. f, a, b: hadronic param. f a gives SM part Amp ~ f (a + b ) B fKs Rate ? s ~ p: LR Chiral Enhancement George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  12. Amplitudes hadronic uncertainty V∓ A Reason why Opposite Trend inSfKs vsSh’Ks , SKsp0 Right-handed interactions George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  13. The Two Scenarios • Scenario 1: s ~p/2 • SfKs~ 0.45 accommodating • gluino mass~ 650 – 900 GeV • [Prefer to keep gluino mass • above 500 GeV (L.E. Constraints) • Scenario 2: s ~ 3p/2 • Sh’Ks ~ 0.3 - 0.4 • gluino mass~ 650 – 800 GeV George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  14. Interesting! Clean Measure: DmBs, sin2FBs 1, 0.5 TeV • Scenario 1: s ~p/2 • SfKs~ 0.45 • gluino mass~ 650 – 900 GeV • - DmBs ~ 25 - 90ps-1 • - sin2FBs ~+1 • Scenario 2: s ~ 3p/2 • Sh’Ks ~ 0.3 - 0.4 • gluino mass~ 650 – 800 GeV • - DmBs ~ 50 - 100ps-1 • - sin2FBs ~―1 2, 0.5 1, 0.5 2, 0.5 1, 0.8 2, 0.8 N.B. sin2FBs not discriminating George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  15. 3rd Measure: Wrong Helicity Photon inb sgR b sgL in SM • Strength of Mixing-dep. CPV • Test gR component • (Atwood, Gronau, Soni, 1997) • SK*0(Ksp0)gnowPromising • Scenario 1: s ~p/2 • SKsp 0g~ 0 (―0.1 - +0.2) • Not Easy. • Scenario 2: s ~ 3p/2 • SKsp 0g ~ ―0.4 - ― 0.7 • Much Easier ! Free of hadronic uncertainty SKsp 0gbetter thansin2FBs George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  16. Collider Direct Search Model[assume maximal mixing] Two Particle System  3 Parameters TeV Scale SUSY NP CPV phase s~ 90°or 270° ~ 200 - 500 GeV ~ 650 - 900 GeV Two Scenarios but need to disentangle hadronic effect Clean Modes @ Flavor Factory George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  17. Collider Direct Search Standard b squark limit diluted by dual s-bflavor of George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  18. Question is Decay: bino LSP • or gravitino • Can be Stable? (LSP) Detection • Basically, just a light “b”-squark in Production • so, Discovery not a problem. sin2q is b fraction Anyway, need Good b-tagging ! [s-tagging?] In principle  Heavy MIPs George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  19. standard sbeauty • Discovery (> 10 evts) • up to 300 GeV • w/ 2 fb−1 & sin2qm>0.5 • Single vs double b-tag • contain info on sinqm • b-tag cross section: • check consistency • vs mass reference 1 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  20. Comment on fK*Polarization Puzzle refer to Hsiang-nan’s talk George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  21. g b x x Heuristic/Drastic Model On-shell bsg: gis Transverse bsg ~ 3 x 10−4 bsg ~ few x 10−3 0.1% ? 10% BK*g ~ 4 x 10−5 BKT*fT~ 5 x 10−6 min. is “gg” Simple String Fragmentation  Resonances Complicated Color Structure George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  22. Really, | 〉 component of |K*〉 Ansatz Soft ad hocterm George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  23. Strong disagreement in r+K*0 rate • If BaBar value, then r+K*0 can be fed • from f/w K*+ via Rescattering George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  24. Conclusion • SfKs,SKsp0 ,Sh’Ks Data May StillCall for - Larges-b Mixing, w/ New CPV Phase & R.-h. Interaction • A Light Flavor-mixed Squark? Independtly Well Motivated (Flavor & SUSY) • Survive b s g (!) • Can Account for SfKs ≲ SyKs, xorSKsp0 ,Sh’Ks ≲ SyKs • DmBs,sin2FBsnow Quite Measurable and Interesting • SKsp0g Promising, Clean; better CPV measure than sin2FBs • fK*Polarization Puzzle may call for Drastic Remedy • Search at Tevatron (maybe at LHC) Profitable George W.S. Hou (NTU)

More Related