1 / 4

Evaluation Tools and Approaches

Evaluation Tools and Approaches. Zoe Barley, Sheila Arens, Kerry Englert, Mariam Manley Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning www.mcrel.org Canadian Evaluation Society Vancouver B.C. June, 2003. A Brief History of Evaluation. Pre 1900 – Age of Reform

amuro
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation Tools and Approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Tools and Approaches Zoe Barley, Sheila Arens, Kerry Englert, Mariam Manley Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning www.mcrel.org Canadian Evaluation Society Vancouver B.C. June, 2003

  2. A Brief History of Evaluation • Pre 1900 – Age of Reform • 1900–1930 – Age of Testing • 1930-1945 – Tylerian Age • 1946-1957 – Age of Innocence • 1958-1972 – Age of Expansion • 1973- -- Age of Professionalization From Madaus, G.F.,Scriven, M.S., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1983) Evaluation Models, Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing: Boston

  3. First Generation – Measurement First school tests (1897); Binet’s work (1900’s); Expansion of school testing Second Generation – Description 8 year study (1933); focus on implementation Third Generation – Judgment Countenance model (1967); Discrepancy eval (1971); CIPP (1971); Goal Free (1973) Fourth Generation – Responsive Constructivist claims, concerns, issues of the stakeholder; Responsive evaluation; empowerment evaluation; participatory/collaborative evaluation From Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage Publications: Newbury Park Role of evaluator: Technical Describer Judge Collaborator Stage manager Change Agent Another History

  4. Why Engage the Stakeholder? • Program evaluation is a process by which society learns about itself. • Program evaluations should contribute to enlightened discussion of alternative plans for social action. • In debates over controversial programs, liars figure and figures lie; the evaluator has the responsibility to protect the clients form both types of deception. • A theory of evaluation must be as much a theory of political interaction as it is a theory of how to determine facts. • The evaluator is an educator; his success is to be judged by what others learn. • Those who shape policy should reach decisions with their eyes open; it is the evaluator's task to illuminate the situation, not to dictate the decision. From Cronbach, L.J and Associates (1980), Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Jossey-Bass: San Francisco

More Related