1 / 21

J.S. Mill

Jeremy Bentham. J.S. Mill. Utilitarianism. “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” J.S.MILL.

anana
Télécharger la présentation

J.S. Mill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jeremy Bentham J.S. Mill

  2. Utilitarianism • “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, utility, or the greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” J.S.MILL

  3. The utilitarian principle: Act to promote the greatest good (happiness) for the greatest number.

  4. Bentham’s ActUtilitarianism • Jeremy Bentham • 1748-1832 • Philosopher of ethics & political-legal theory • Democrat, reformer

  5. Bentham=s project • Was to find an objective basis for moral decision making. • He rejected notions of “moral sense,” “right reason,” “fitness of things” common in his day. • He found pleasure to be the only objective good, and pain the only evil.

  6. A Key Assumption: Psychological Hedonism • “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do.” • Jeremy Bentham

  7. Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus: • Assumes that pleasures & pains are quantifiable • Assumes pleasures are equal • Sets up a simple calculation that reveals which actions are the more morally worthy

  8. We can calculate the merits of any action according to criteria 1. Intensity 2. Duration 3. Certainty or uncertainty 4. Nearness or remoteness 5. Fecundity 6. Purity 7. Multiply 1-6 by number of affected individuals.

  9. The result: • “Sum the values of all the pleasures on the one side and those of the pains on the other. The balance, if it be . . . pleasure, will give the good tendency of the act . . . if on the side of pain, the bad tendency.” J. Bentham

  10. Questioning the assumptions: “Quantity of pleasures being equal, pushpin is as good as poetry.”J. Bentham But are pleasures really equal? • Is happiness really quantifiable?

  11. Questioning the implications • Is it too much to ask each individual to calculate each act? • What is the ideal reach of the theory? What does it require? • Does its premise (psychological hedonism) undermine its ethical principle?

  12. Mill’s Rule Utilitarianism • John Stuart Mill • 1806-1873 • Used utilitarian theory to promote 19th C. social reforms • Tries to correct Bentham’s theory

  13. From Act to Rule “There is no time, previous to action, for calculating and weighing the effects of any line of conduct on general happiness. J. S. Mill

  14. Rule Utilitarianism • Based on past experience & knowledge, we can determine what acts in general produce happiness over unhappiness • apply the Utilitarian principle to general rules, or moral codes as a whole. • i.e. the Ten Commandments • Or the Bill of Rights

  15. Pleasure Correction • All pleasures are not equal. • “No intelligent being would consent to be a fool.” j. s. mill • Distinguishes “base” from “noble” pleasures.

  16. Advantages of utilitarianism: It recognizes the social context of morality. Best applies when large numbers are affected by an action. Highlights a common sense belief about ethical behavior Actions should promote positive consequences.

  17. Critique of utilitarianism • How can it be consistently applied? • Seems to sanction morally abhorrent actions • Promotes a kind of cost-benefit analysis • Ecological ethics, Business Ethics: Modern slavery, Sale of Organs, consumer protection

  18. Does Utilitarianism ask too much?

  19. Issue of knowledge • How far into the future must we calculate the consequences? • How accurate can our knowledge of the future ever be? • An ambiguity: When am I moral? • When I intend to promote GH? • When I in fact promote GH?

  20. Issue of Self-Sacrifice • Places the collective above the individual • Asks us to subordinate individual interests for the good of the whole • Do these facts undermine the core values of individuality? Self reliance? Autonomy? Independence?

  21. Questions of Happiness How is happiness to be defined? A. By the individual? This leads to relativism or subjectivism. B. By some objective standard? This implies there is another standard that grounds utilitarianism.

More Related