1 / 29

Dr. Elizabeth Weekes Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Lond

Controversies in the determination of energy requirements. Dr. Elizabeth Weekes Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London. Controversies. Is measured energy expenditure (MEE) always the most accurate way to determine energy requirements?

andralyn
Télécharger la présentation

Dr. Elizabeth Weekes Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Lond

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Controversies in the determination of energy requirements Dr. Elizabeth Weekes Department of Nutrition & Dietetics Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London

  2. Controversies • Is measured energy expenditure (MEE) always the most accurate way to determine energy requirements? • Is it valid to extrapolate results from a study population to an individual patient? • What should we do in clinical practice? • If I feed my patient to estimated energy requirements will he/she do better than if I don’t?

  3. Total Energy Expenditure DIT Activity BMR

  4. Methods of estimating energy expenditure • Indirect calorimetry • Short-term measurements (up to 24 hours) • Hood/ventilator modes • Doubly-labelled water technique • Long-term measurements (several weeks) • Cost and technical considerations • Measures Total Energy Expenditure • Prediction equations + fudge factors

  5. Prediction equations • May over or under-estimate compared with measured energy expenditure (MEE) • Inadequately validated • Poor predictive value for individuals • Open to misinterpretation (Cortes & Nelson, 1989; Malone, 2002; Reeves & Capra, 2003)

  6. Basal metabolic rate • Minimal intra-individual variation ~ 3% • Inter-individual variation ~ 10% depending on:- • proportions of body cell mass and metabolically active organs and tissues • thyroid function • circadian rythms

  7. Conditions essential for measuring BMR • Post-absorptive (12 hour fast) • Lying still at physical and mental rest • Thermo-neutral environment (27 – 29oC) • No tea/coffee/nicotine in previous 12 hours • No heavy physical activity previous day • Gases must be calibrated • Establish steady-state (~ 30 minutes) * If any of the above conditions are not met = Resting Energy Expenditure (REE)

  8. Measured Energy Expenditure (MEE) • Measured in clinical setting by indirect calorimetry (rarely available in UK hospitals) • Recommended in certain conditions e.g. liver disease, obesity, critical illness (ASPEN, 2002) • Needs to be measured correctly in order to provide valid and reliable data

  9. MEE in healthy subjects Activity DIT Doubly-labelled water BMR Indirect calorimetry

  10. MEE in clinical studies • Calibration • How long and how often to measure • Achieving a steady-state • Lying in bed, awake and aware • No social or physical interactions • Avoid haemodialysis and filtration • Patient/apparatus interface • Hood/canopy • Ventilated patients

  11. MEE in disease Activity DIT BMR + Stress Indirect calorimetry

  12. Controversies • Is measured energy expenditure (MEE) always the most accurate way to determine energy requirements? • Is it valid to extrapolate results from a study population to an individual patient? • What should we do in clinical practice? • If I feed my patient to estimated energy requirements will he/she do better than if I don’t?

  13. Reviewing the literature • Patient demography • Sample size • Diagnosis • Severity of illness/injury and metabolic status • Nutritional status • Nutritional intake • Temperature (room and patient) • Therapeutic interventions e.g. ventilation, drugs • Methodology

  14. Energy requirements in COPD • Schols et al. (1996) Age 61 (+ 6) years; BMI 23.5 (+ 4.2) kg/m2 REE < 105 % HB in 14 patients REE > 120 % HB in 16 patients (weight-losing,  FFM,  CRP and  acute phase proteins) 30 stable COPD patients admitted to rehabilitation unit • Vermeeren et al., (1997) Age 63 (+ 8) years; BMI 23.0 (+ 3.2) kg/m2 REE 123 (+ 11) % HB on admission REE 113 (+ 14) % HB on discharge (REE > 110 % HB in 10 patients at discharge) 23 acute COPD patients admitted to hospital

  15. Controversies • Is measured energy expenditure (MEE) always the most accurate way to determine energy requirements? • Is it valid to extrapolate results from a study population to an individual patient? • What should we do in clinical practice? • If I feed my patient to estimated energy requirements will he/she do better than if I don’t?

  16. Estimating requirements in clinical practice (I) • Assess metabolic state • Is my patient metabolically stressed, recovering or anabolic • Is there a risk of re-feeding syndrome? • Establish physical activity level • Is the patient sedated, bed-bound, mobile on ward, receiving physiotherapy, at home • Determine goals of treatment • e.g. minimise losses, weight maintenance or weight change

  17. Metabolic response to injury

  18. Assessing metabolic stress • Stressed •  temperature •  urea •  white cell count •  C-reactive protein •  albumin •  insulin resistance • Oedema N.B. Stress response may be blunted in immuno- compromised and elderly patients

  19. Stress factors • Timing of measurements • Over (hyperalimentation) vs. under-feeding • Changes in therapeutic interventions e.g. improved wound care, anti-pyretics, sedation, control of ambient room temperature  Err towards lower end of the range and monitor

  20. Estimating requirements in clinical practice (I) • Assess metabolic state • Is my patient metabolically stressed, recovering or anabolic • Is there a risk of re-feeding syndrome? • Establish physical activity level • Is the patient sedated, bed-bound, mobile on ward, receiving physiotherapy, at home • Determine goals of treatment • e.g. minimise losses, weight maintenance or weight change

  21. Physical activity • Assumes normal neuro-muscular function Review literature for patients with abnormal function e.g. brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, cerebral palsy, motor neurone disease and Huntington’s chorea • Prolonged and active physiotherapy • Increased effort of moving injured/painful limbs • Mechanical inefficiency e.g. COPD (Baarends et al., 1997)

  22. Physical activity • Free living individuals have higher energy expenditure due to physical activity • Nursing home and house-bound patients may have similar activity levels to hospitalised patients • For active patients in the community a PAL should be added

  23. Estimating requirements in clinical practice (I) • Assess metabolic state • Is my patient metabolically stressed, recovering or anabolic • Is there a risk of re-feeding syndrome? • Establish physical activity level • Is the patient sedated, bed-bound, mobile on ward, receiving physiotherapy, at home • Determine goals of treatment • Should I aim to minimise losses, maintain weight or achieve weight change (loss or gain)

  24. Estimating requirements in clinical practice II • Be aware of the literature on energy requirements in your patient group (and any gaps in the evidence) • Compare your patient with available literature and either assign relevant stress factor OR adjust for weight change • Monitor, review and amend requirements as clinical condition, physical activity and nutritional goals change

  25. If I feed my patient to estimated energy requirements will he/she do better than if I don’t? • Over-feeding is not good (Askanazi et al., 1980; Lowry & Brenman, 1979; Kirkpatrick et al., 1981) • Is under-feeding always bad? • Should we start everyone on 1500 kcal/day?

  26. Conclusions • Estimated requirements are only a starting point • Set realistic goals of treatment for each patient • Monitor and amend as patient’s condition changes • Review and critically appraise the literature • Be aware of gaps in the evidence • Understand the limitations of guidelines • Check applicability to your patients • Contribute to research and audit projects

More Related