1 / 21

SLA Review Session

Chapter 5 Recent perspectives on the role of previously known languages. The evolution of the L1 in SLA:Contrastive analysis (chapter 3)Error analysis (chapter 3)Mentalist perspectivesCognitive perspectivesPsychotypology. Chapter 5. What do morpheme order studies tell us (Dulay

andres
Télécharger la présentation

SLA Review Session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. SLA Review Session Chapters 5-8 March 3, 2006

    2. Chapter 5 Recent perspectives on the role of previously known languages The evolution of the L1 in SLA: Contrastive analysis (chapter 3) Error analysis (chapter 3) Mentalist perspectives Cognitive perspectives Psychotypology

    3. Chapter 5 What do morpheme order studies tell us (Dulay & Burt 1973, etc.; Bailey, Madden & Krashen 1974) ? --favor mental processes in SLA, lack of importance of NL

    4. Chapter 5 Cognitive view of language learning (Kellerman, 1979) --the learners perception of the L1-L2 differences/similarities are more important than the actual differences/similarities

    5. Chapter 5 Learner psychotypology -- learners categorize language data along a continuum from language-neutral to language-specific

    6. Chapter 5 Cross-linguistic Interference (Kellerman & Sharwood Smith, 1986) vs. Transfer --a broader term, including transfer, avoidance, language loss, rate of learning

    7. Chapter 6 SLA and linguistics Two approaches to language universals: --typological universals (Greenberg 1963) --universal grammar (chapter 7)

    8. Chapter 6 Why is the study of language universals important to that of SLA? -- both NL and IL are natural systems -- Interlanguage Structural Conformity Hypothesis: All universals that are true for primary languages are also true for interlanguages. (Eckman, Moravcsik, & Wirth, 1989)

    9. Chapter 6 What is the aim of the study of typological universals? --aims to discover similarities/differences in languages around the world --to determine what types of languages are possible

    10. Chapter 6 Markedness Differential Hypothesis (Eckman, 1977) --unmarked structures are easier to learn/acquire than marked

    11. Chapter 7 Universal Grammar Nativist approach --general nativism: there is no specific mechanism designed for language learning --special nativism (UG): posit special principles for language learning that are unique to language and not used in other cognitive endeavors

    12. Chapter 7 Motivation of UG --the uniformly successful and speedy acquisition of language by children in spite of insufficient input

    13. Chapter 7 What does UG consist of? --principles that characterize core grammars of all natural languages --parameters that vary across languages

    14. Chapter 7 Kinds of evidence positive evidence: comes from the input, set of well-formed utterances negative evidence: information telling the learner that the utterance is incorrect or impossible (direct, indirect)

    15. Chapter 7 Fundamental Difference Hypothesis: --L1 and L2 acquisition are fundamentally different --adult L2 learners do not have access to UG --what they know of language universals is constructed through their NL

    16. Chapter 7 Access to UG hypothesis full transfer/partial (or no) access no transfer/full access full transfer/full access partial transfer/full access partial transfer/partial access

    17. Question: What is the weakness of UG when applied to second language acquisition? --concerned with syntax, not semantics, pragmatics and discourse --social and psychological variables are ignored --methodology relies too much on grammaticality judgment tests (Mitchell, 1998)

    18. Chapter 8 Looking at interlanguage processes Linguistic perspective: emphasis on constraints on grammar formation Psychological (cognitive) perspective: emphasis on the actual mechanisms involved in SLA as well as on issues of working memory and parsing Sociolinguistic perspective: emphasis on external social and contextual variables

    19. Chapter 8 Competition Model (Bates & MacWhinney, 1982): --a performance model, not a competence model --assumes form and function are inseparable --learners first resort to their NL interpretation strategies

    20. Chapter 8 Krashens Monitor Model: acquisition vs. learning (subconscious, conscious) Comprehensible input i+1 language that is heard/read that is slightly ahead of a learners current state of knowledge

    21. Question: What are the differences between UG-based and cognitive approach? --human beings to be endowed with a language-specific module in the mind; human mind is geared to the processing of all kinds of information --competence; performance --language; learning

    22. Thanks for your attention! Different approaches/theories to SLA

More Related