1 / 26

Analysis of Student Work to Develop Teacher Knowledge of Inquiry Science

Analysis of Student Work to Develop Teacher Knowledge of Inquiry Science. Erin Peters, M.Ed., NBCT Doctoral Student in Science Education. Purpose of Study. Qualitative Study embedded in 5-year Design-Based Research project Discover teachers’ perceptions about understanding inquiry science

andrew
Télécharger la présentation

Analysis of Student Work to Develop Teacher Knowledge of Inquiry Science

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of Student Work to Develop Teacher Knowledge of Inquiry Science Erin Peters, M.Ed., NBCT Doctoral Student in Science Education

  2. Purpose of Study Qualitative Study embedded in 5-year Design-Based Research project • Discover teachers’ perceptions about understanding inquiry science • Discover teachers perceptions about how inquiry happens in 4th grade science classrooms • Explore alignment of teacher conceptual frameworks of inquiry science with classroom practices and with ideal models of inquiry

  3. Conceptual Context of Research • Study developed from an interest in patterns expressed in reflections of student work studies revealing increased understanding of inquiry • Researcher’s initial model of inquiry was inadequate in the analysis phase of research • A reformed model of inquiry was developed from background literature and helped to inform the analysis phase of research

  4. Student Work Analysis Components • Teacher Information Worksheet • Framework and rationale for lesson • Questions to Facilitate Discussion • Guided peer review to inquiry-based instruction • Student Work Samples • Work that exceeds expectations, meets expectations and does not meet expectation • Teacher Reflection

  5. Researcher’s Initial Model of Science Inquiry Enacting the features of process science • Observing • Inferring • Concluding • Estimating • Controlling variables • Organizing data • Classifying

  6. Researcher’s Refined Model of Science Inquiry Includes features that make science valuable and unique as a discipline • Nature follows rules and patterns which are understandable • Models are useful as representations, but must be evaluated for weaknesses • Claims are supported by evidence • Scientific knowledge can be applied universally and is sometimes subject to change • Explanations about science come partly from observations and partly from ideas • (Benchmarks, 1996)

  7. Conceptual Framework of Study Background Research Student Work Analysis Survey of Teacher Perception of Inquiry Science Researcher’s First Mental Model of Inquiry Baseline Interview Teacher Developed Concept Map about Inquiry Class Discussions and Readings Interactions with a Scientist Best Practice Video Series Researcher’s Refined Mental Model of Inquiry Teacher Developed Concept Map about Inquiry Follow Up Interview

  8. Research Questions Research Focus: • What are teacher perceptions of inquiry at the beginning and mid-point of a graduate course involving intensive exploration of science inquiry? • What are teacher perceptions about how inquiry happens in a 4th grade science classroom? • How do teachers’ perceptions of inquiry compare with their perceptions of how inquiry happens in the classroom? • How do teacher conceptions of inquiry compare with the researcher’s initial and refined models of inquiry?

  9. Background Literature • Investigation into experienced science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry • Provides keys in understanding which belief conditions may be more apt to adopt inquiry-based lessons • (Wallace & Kang, 2004) • High school teachers’ decision making models for planning and teaching science • Decisions are dominated by considerations for student development, curriculum guide objectives and pressures of accountability • (Duschl & Wright, 1989)

  10. Background Literature • Epistemology of science is directly related to the nature of science • Epistemology of science can be considered as a tool for reflecting on contents of knowledge • (Larochelle & Desautels, 1991) • Implicit versus Explicit Nature of Science Instruction • The nature of science should be expressed explicitly for a positive cognitive outcome • (Bell, Lederman & Abd-El-Khalick, 1998)

  11. Background Literature • Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice • Teachers’ conceptions of science do not necessarily influence classroom practice • (Lederman, 1999) • Bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry • Empirical research does not support the idea that scientific inquiry alone teaches concepts about the nature of science • (Schwartz, Lederman & Crawford, 2003)

  12. Participants & Data Sources • Participants in research • Six teachers – 4th grade students • Data Sources • Interviews • Probing for beliefs, understanding and views on teaching practice related to inquiry-based learning in science • Concept maps • Probing for conceptual framework of inquiry-based science • Supplemental Data Sources • Research Memos • Reflections from Student Work Assessment • Surveys

  13. Methods Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach • (Maxwell, 1996) • Converted interview text into concept maps • Explored intersections of initial interviews and initial concept maps • Explored intersections of subsequent interviews and subsequent concept maps • Separated intersections into concepts and practice • Examined similarities and differences in initial intersections and subsequent intersections • Reviewed concepts maps on a structural level and on a textual level • (Spector, 2004) • Compared participant initial conceptions to subsequent conceptions and to an ideal model of inquiry

  14. Validity Checks • Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach • -(Maxwell, 1996)

  15. Intersection Data

  16. Intersection data

  17. Survey Data

  18. Survey data

  19. Survey Results Common to Findings • Teachers felt asking students open-ended questions was important and reported that open-ended questions were prevalent in their classes • Teachers did not feel strongly that evidence should be supplied to support claims by students • Teachers reported a low importance for student designed activities to test ideas

  20. Survey Results Contrasting Findings • Teachers reported a high level of explicit description of the habits of mind required for science in their class • Implies a gap between teacher perceptions and practice regarding the nature of science

  21. Changes in Teacher Perceptions of Inquiry • Inquiry is no longer synonymous with the scientific method • “I think I thought before that it (inquiry) was . . . more like the scientific method and now I am seeing that it is not.” • “At the beginning . . . When I think about teaching science, it was the scientific method.” • Inquiry is not a linear process, but a cyclical one • “Inquiry is about so many different things.” • I thought before it (inquiry) was more linear.” • “ . . . not having students learn in steps.” • “Also that one question leads to another questions and it’s a cycle.”

  22. Limited Concept of Inquiry • Teacher perception of inquiry as a general question-answer cycle is not exclusive to science as a discipline • “Inquiry is questioning . . . and their questions change” • “Students use their resources to find their answers” • “. . . curiosity and exploring questions” • Teachers’ conception of science inquiry incorporates few science process skills • Observing • Predicting • Experimenting • Communicating

  23. Further Study • Videos of peer analysis of student work products could have revealed more about how teachers think about inquiry • Specific discussion of the features of the nature of science could clarify inquiry to the participants • Interviews could have questions probing teacher understanding of the nature of science and the connection to inquiry

  24. Implications • An extension of this study could explore the effect of explicit instruction in the nature of science on teacher perceptions of inquiry • Could a deeper understanding of the nature of science help teachers become more proficient in teaching inquiry? • Difficult to distinguish between concepts and practice in teacher perceptions • Do teachers distinguish between their conception of inquiry and how inquiry is used as a practice?

  25. Acknowledgements • Dr. Brenda Bannan-Ritland • Provided constant feedback in data gathering, analysis and final presentation • John Baek, M.Ed. • Provided valuable feedback for background research and helped to take the analysis to a deeper level • 4th Grade Science Teacher Participants

  26. Contact Information Erin Peters Graduate Research Assistant George Mason University Science Lead Teacher Williamsburg Middle School Arlington, Virginia erin_peters@apsva.us

More Related