1 / 23

Planning reform

Planning reform. 8 th April 2014. CPRE / ChALC Middlewich. Context. NPPF Practice Guidance Local Plans – or planning by appeal? Neighbourhood Planning Associated changes Rhetoric!. Presumption in favour of sustainable development.

angeni
Télécharger la présentation

Planning reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning reform 8th April 2014 CPRE / ChALC Middlewich

  2. Context • NPPF • Practice Guidance • Local Plans – or planning by appeal? • Neighbourhood Planning • Associated changes • Rhetoric! Planning reform

  3. Presumption in favour of sustainable development • Plans must meet objectively assessed needs (& positively seek opportunities) unless:- • Adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweigh benefits • Specific policies restrict development • Decisions must: • approve applications that accord with plan without delay • Approve applications where plan is absent, silent or out-of-date, unless…. Planning reform

  4. Economic emphasis 8: “economic, social and environmental gains should be sought jointly and simultaneously” 17: “proactively drive economic development…every effort should be made…respond positively to opportunities for growth…” 19: “ensure the planning system does everything it can to support growth…significant weight…” Viability & market signals Local Enterprise Partnerships Planning reform

  5. Brownfield • “Encouraged” • “…may continue to consider the case” • 1.5 million homes potential! • Guidance • More encouragement - viability • Local flexibility • Warrington 80% target • PINS interventions – discouraging • Neighbourhood Plan scope Planning reform

  6. Green Belt • Planning applications – strong protection • Government interventions • Local transport infrastructure • Community Right to Build • Much greater pressure on countryside outside GB • Local Plan development – encouragement to review • (Government intervention?) Planning reform

  7. Housing • 5 year supply of sites that are • Available • Suitable • Achievable • Viable + buffer + backlog • No 5 year supply = housing policies out of date & presumption applies • Full, objectively assessed needs “…as far as is consistent…” (47) Planning reform

  8. NPPF - Countryside, character, identity • 17 - plans and decisions should “take account of the different roles and character of different areas, promoting the vitality of our main urban areas, protecting the Green Belts around them, recognising the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside and supporting thriving rural communities within it;” • 58 - “Planning policies and decisions should aim to ensure that developments... respond to local character and history, and reflect the identity of local surroundings …” • 61 – “planning policies and decisions should address the connections between people and places and the integration of new development into the natural, built and historic environment.” Planning reform

  9. NPPF – Design, local distinctiveness, quality • 60 – “Planning policies and decisions should not attempt to impose architectural styles or particular tastes and they should not stifle innovation, originality or initiative through unsubstantiated requirements to conform to certain development forms or styles. It is, however, proper to seek to promote or reinforce local distinctiveness.” • 64 – “Permission should be refused for development of poor design that fails to take the opportunities available for improving the character and quality of an area and the way it functions.” • 131 - “In determining planning applications, local planning authorities should take account of… the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness” Planning reform

  10. Countryside protection, character, design… • Existing Local Plan policies can still apply if ‘NPPF compliant’ – even without 5 year supply • Adverse impacts capable of significantly and demonstrably outweighing benefits • Sandiway, Cheshire W: 2197189 • Alsager, Cheshire E: 2195201 • Barnstaple, Devon: 2182606 • Seaton, Devon: 2202124 • Engine Common, Glos: 2186546 • Taunton, Somerset: 2177389 • Colne, Lancashire: 2195745 Planning reform

  11. Access to services & facilities Public transport, walking & cycling Air, noise and light pollution Integration with existing development (part of the village or an “estate plonked on the edge”) Environmental impacts Climate change “It would be contrary to the fundamental principles of the NPPF if the presumption in favour of development in paragraph 14 applied equally to sustainable and non-sustainable development” Mrs Justice Lang, High Court, October 2013 (paragraph 37) Overall sustainability Planning reform

  12. Local Plans • Still cornerstone of system: “applications for planning permission must be determined in accordance with the development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise.” (2) • Vital to influence – strategic policies • CWAC – Examination hearings 17 June – 4 July • CEC – consultation deadline 25 April Planning reform

  13. Neighbourhood Planning • 1,000+ applied, 750+ approved, 75 published, 10 “made” • 75% in south of England, 67% in rural areas • Referendums - mixed turnouts, big majorities • Major issues (14 successfully examined plans) • Protecting places, facilities & features • Securing developer contributions • Allocating sites & reserves (prioritising brownfield) • Setting development conditions, eg densities, types, rates, scales • Promote sustainable, compatible economic growth • Design standards and features • Congestion reduction Planning reform

  14. Neighbourhood Planning – perceived impacts • 55% seek to resist new development  63% in rural areas • Controversies • Tattenhall JR – Local Plan absence (SEA, Examiner) (Winslow, Winsford & 50+% of potential plans!) • Bermondsey, Wapping, Daws Hill – boundary disputes • Littlehampton – policy conflict with Borough Council • Developers ‘taking advantage of opportunities’ • Weight given to emerging plans • Committees vs Inspectors • Guidance ‘clarifies’ – little weight before end of ‘publicity period’ Planning reform

  15. Community Infrastructure Levy Neighbourhood Fund http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN03890/community-infrastructure-levy Planning reform

  16. Village Greens Any land on which a significant number of inhabitants of any area has indulged in lawful sports and pastimes, for 20 years, as of right. But… Trigger events preventing registration:- • One year after ‘rights’ withdrawn • Planning applications • Local or Neighbourhood Plans • Local or Neighbourhood Development Orders • Transport and Works Act Orders www.oss.org.uk Planning reform

  17. Village Greens in the courts • South Bank Undercroft – challenging refusal (September hearing) • Walton-on-the Naze – challenging refusal • Huddersfield and Weymouth – historical registrations overturned • Thamesfield, Berkshire – application too late Planning reform

  18. Local Green Space designation • Designate through Local or Neighbourhood Plans • “Very special circumstances” • Reasonably close proximity • Demonstrably special • Particular local significance, (eg beauty, history, recreation, tranquillity, wildlife) • Local in character, not an “extensive tract of land”. • www.leics.gov.uk/greenspaces / http://tinyurl.com/nzlxbyz Planning reform

  19. Assets of Community Value • Land or buildings with a use that furthers the wellbeing or interests of the community • If offered for sale, community groups have: • six weeks to submit a bid request • six-months to prepare a bid • Material consideration (NPPF 70) • Overturned – Hampshire pub, Dorset playing fields Planning reform

  20. Neighbourhood Development Orders & Community Right to Build • NDOs can: • apply to a specific site, sites, or wider geographical area • grant planning permission for a certain type or types of development • grant planning permission outright or subject to conditions. • Allerdale – first NDOs in examination • CRTBOs can: • Support small-scale, community-led development • Apply to one or more buildings • Be undertaken by any community organisation • Slaugham – first CRTBOs rejected (for now!) Planning reform

  21. Change of use – permitted development rights • Agricultural buildings up to 450 sq m  3 dwellings, shops, offices, light industry, storage & distribution, cafes, hotels, leisure • Offices  homes • Offices, light industry, hotels, leisure, residential institutions  state-funded schools • Temporary (two year) changes of use between business types • (Article 4 direction) Planning reform

  22. Useful websites • NPPF http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ • Local plans www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/your_council/policies_and_performance/council_plans_and_strategies/planning_policy.aspx www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/planning/spatial_planning/cheshire_east_local_plan.aspx • Neighbourhood planning http://mycommunityrights.org.uk/neighbourhood-planning/ http://www.ourneighbourhoodplanning.org.uk/ • Appeal decisions www.pcs.planningportal.gov.uk/pcsportal/CaseSearch.asp • Guidance http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/ • Planning Help www.planninghelp.org.uk & CPRE NPPF briefings http://www.cpre.org.uk/local-group-resources/campaigning/planning Planning reform

  23. Andy Yuille Senior Policy Adviser, CPRE North West andyyuille@gmail.com Planning reform

More Related