1 / 19

Surface Study of In 2 O 3 and Sn-doped In 2 O 3 thin films with (100) and (111) orientations

Surface Study of In 2 O 3 and Sn-doped In 2 O 3 thin films with (100) and (111) orientations. Erie H. Morales a) , M. Batzill b) and U. Diebold a) a) Department of Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118 b) Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620.

annora
Télécharger la présentation

Surface Study of In 2 O 3 and Sn-doped In 2 O 3 thin films with (100) and (111) orientations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Surface Study of In2O3 and Sn-doped In2O3 thin films with (100) and (111) orientations Erie H. Moralesa), M. Batzillb) and U. Diebolda) a) Department of Physics, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118 b) Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 NSF # CHE 0715576, CHE 010908

  2. Motivation • Sn doped In2O3 is a Transparent Conducting Oxide • Besides being used in solar cells finds application in Organic Light Emitting Diodes as hole injector • Mostly used in polycristalline form • Orientation most studied is (100) • Few surfaces studies on any other low index orientation

  3. Characterization • Substrates and films where characterized using in situ RHEED, LEED and XPS • Also sample where characterized using UPS at Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices, Baton Rouge Louisiana

  4. Preparation • Substrate • YSZ Yttrium Stabilized Zirconia, (Y 9%) • Cubic body centered, cube-on-cube epitaxy with In2O3 • Lattice parameter • YSZ is 0.5125 nm • In2O3is 1.0117 nm • Substrate prepared by high temp treatment at 1350 C* * Hiromichi Ohta et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 19 (2000) 2740-2742

  5. RHEED Substrate Characterization

  6. In2O3 Crystal Structure • BCC a = 1.0117 nm • Substrate lattice mismatch is 1% • (100) has a polar character • (111) is not polar

  7. In2O3 Films • Films • UHV 5 10-10 mbar base pressure • Molecular Beam Epitaxy • In e-beam evaporated at 0.1 nm/min • Oxygen Plasma Assisted at 15mA • O2 at 5 10-6mbar • O2 at 10-5 mbar • Sn was co-evaporated using a Knudsen cell • Growth temperatures at 450, 550 and 800C, highest temp gives best results

  8. RHEED In2O3 Film

  9. LEEDIn2O3 & ITO (100) • In2O3 (100) facets • Sn doped In2O3 at different Sn concentrations from 11% to 3 % results in stabilization of the surface • 9% Sn shown

  10. ARXPS • Surface sensitive at higher polar angles. When rotating sample photoelectron would need to travel longer distance to surface. Considering IMFP only photoelectrons closer to surface manage to be detected

  11. ARXPS of In2O3 (100) and Forward Scattering Analysis

  12. Sn-doped In2O2 (100) • Sn segregates to the surface

  13. Sn-doped In2O2 (111) • Sn does not segregate to surface, I measured this yesterday!!!, nice!

  14. LEED YSZ(111) In2O3 (111) • YSZ(111) substrate and In2O3 at 103eV 2x2

  15. UPS • Point is Sn derived states in the Band Gap • Point is to correlate it to Sn segregation observed in XPS and the fact that UPS is surface sensitive corroborating Sn migration to the surface or Sn terminated surface

  16. Valence Band Maximum • Still an open question the measured VBM at 2.6 eV smaller than 3.7eV • Optical BG Direct and Indirect meas. by Weiher and Ley J. Appl. Phys 37 1 (1966) • UPS meas. by A. Klein et al. Phys. Rev. B 73 245312 (2006)

  17. In2O3 & ITO (100) • Gap State and Resonant Photoemission of gap state

  18. Compare VB ITO (100) & (111) • Point is Sn derived states doesn’t show so clearly

  19. Conclusions & Outlook • Sn stabilizes the (100) surface so it doesn’t facet • Sn replaces substitutionally In sites • There are clear Sn derived states in Band Gap • The position of the VBM is an open question • Less clear Sn derived states in (111) corroborated by UPS and ARXPS • Do absorption experiments to see if Sn derived states move to the conduction band on (111) orientation

More Related