200 likes | 319 Vues
This report by the Canadian Renovators' Council provides an in-depth examination of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Canadian homes from 1990 to 2010. It includes CHBA’s annual updates on residential sector performance, highlights changes in new home construction based on CHBA/CanmetENERGY analysis, and explores future energy retrofitting potential. The report compares energy efficiency trends, evaluates existing home performance, and identifies areas of improvement. This analysis aims to inform stakeholders about energy efficiency advancements and the impact on greenhouse gas reductions.
E N D
Recognizing Success Energy Use & Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Canadian Homes 1990 – 2010 Canadian Renovators’ Council, October 2012
Three Part Report: • CHBA’s Annual update on Residential Sector performance. • Closer examination of how new homes have changed based on CHBA/CanmetENERGY analysis. • Future potential for energy retrofitting.
Residential Share of Canada’s GHGs 1990 2010 Source: NIR/EC 2012
Sector Changes in GHG Emissions1990 - 2009 Source: CEUD 2012
Trends in Stock and Energy Use1990 = 0 Source: CEUD 2012
Energy Intensity Trends1990 = 0 Source: CEUD 2012
Comparing “Apples to Apples” • Total stock trends are useful, but they don’t tell us much about how new homes have changed over time. • Existing home energy performance is a ‘moving target’. • When comparing old and new homes, what do we learn if we base this on the ‘as built’, rather than ‘as found’ specifications?
Our “Apple” • 2,100 sq. ft. two-storey home in Ottawa circa 1973 (Four-Square). • Initial “As Built” specifications from CMHC/HUDAC costing studies of that time. • Additional specifications generated by CanmentENERGY, OBC 2012, R-2000 (2012). • Only envelope and mechanical specifications altered to those ‘typical’ of new construction in each period. • ‘As Found’ specifications from initial (pre-grant) ERS evaluation. • All data generated using HOT2000 V. 10.51
‘As Built’ = ERS 41 • ‘As Found’ = ERS 63 = 28.7% improvement • ‘Post ecoENERGY Grant’ = ERS 72 = 44.5% improvement • Same home built to 2012 OBC would consume 66% less energy than mid-1970s spec.
Filling Out the Household Picture:a 69’ Chevy Impala in the driveway
So How’s Detroit Doing? 1969 Chevy Impala 2012 Chevy Impala
On “Apples to Apples” Basis: 15.8% Increase in ‘Combined’ Fuel Efficiency 66% decrease in total energy consumption (ERS 41 to ERS 79) 78.5% decrease in space heating energy consumption