1 / 21

Gravitational Wave Sources From Dense Star Clusters

Gravitational Wave Sources From Dense Star Clusters. Cole Miller University of Maryland. Outline. Detection of gravitational radiation. Sources in stellar clusters. IMBH-IMBH mergers?

apurdue
Télécharger la présentation

Gravitational Wave Sources From Dense Star Clusters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gravitational Wave SourcesFrom Dense Star Clusters Cole Miller University of Maryland

  2. Outline • Detection of gravitational radiation. • Sources in stellar clusters. IMBH-IMBH mergers? • Sources in galactic nuclei. Extreme mass ratio inspirals. Tidal separation of binaries. IMBH-SMBH mergers.

  3. Gravitational Wave Detectors http://www.srl.caltech.edu/lisa/graphics/05.LIGO.LISA.jpg

  4. GW Sources in Clusters • NS-NS merger: rate small compared to disk. • NS-BH, BH-BH: could be important because of unique formation channels. • IMBH-BH? Visible only to small distances with LISA.

  5. NS-NS merger rate From Kim et al. 2004 >10-5/yr at 99% conf

  6. LISA Detection Distance: 1 yr from merger Will (2004)

  7. IMBH-IMBH in Cluster • Stellar collisions, evol --> IMBH? See Freitag talk. • Can more than one IMBH form in cluster? Gurkan, Fregeau, Rasio, in prep. • If so, visible to great distance. Could be LISA and LIGO sources!

  8. Likelihood of IMBH-IMBH? • 50 - 50 Msun to 200 - 200 Msun visible to 2.5-3 Gpc with AdLIGO (Ilya Mandel) Total volume: few x 1010 Mpc3 Similar for LISA (Will 2004) • SF rate at z~0.5: ~10-2 Msun/Mpc3/yr. • Fraction in super star clusters: few x 10%. • If Mcluster~105 Msun, ~103 clusters/yr formed in this volume. • If >0.1% of clusters have IMBH-IMBH, interesting rate!

  9. “Madau Plot”: Star Formation Rate

  10. GW Sources in Galactic Nuclei • M(<few pc)~SMglob Escape velocity much higher than globulars. Retain binaries, facilitate mergers? • Merger of stellar clusters with nucleus. Fresh supply of binaries. Muno et al. 2005 IMBHs as well?

  11. Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals • BH-SMBH or IMBH-SMBH. • Goal: simple mapping of SMBH spacetime. • BH-SMBH uncertainties: Number density of 106 Msun SMBH. Rate of (1) merger, (2) detection w/ LISA.

  12. Binary Tidal Separation by SMBH • Previously, EMRIs considered by capture of single object due to gravitational radiation. • But if BH in binary, pericenter distance can be much greater, hence cross section higher. Miller, Freitag, Hamilton, Lauburg (2005) Separation by IMBH in clusters? Pfahl (2005) • Circularized orbits, no perturbation to plunge. • Key: calculation of binary fraction and properties.

  13. Single-body capture: distant view K. Gultekin

  14. Single-body capture: close-up K. Gultekin

  15. Binary Tidal Separation by SMBH • Previously, EMRIs considered by capture of single object due to gravitational radiation. • But if BH in binary, pericenter distance can be much greater, hence cross section higher. Miller, Freitag, Hamilton, Lauburg (2005) Separation by IMBH in clusters? Pfahl (2005) • Circularized orbits, no perturbation to plunge. • Key: calculation of binary fraction and properties.

  16. Binary separation: close-up V. Lauburg

  17. Binary separation: distant view V. Lauburg

  18. Binary Tidal Separation by SMBH • Previously, EMRIs considered by capture of single object due to gravitational radiation. • But if BH in binary, pericenter distance can be much greater, hence cross section higher. Miller, Freitag, Hamilton, Lauburg (2005) Separation by IMBH in clusters? Pfahl (2005) • Circularized orbits, no perturbation to plunge. • Key: calculation of binary fraction and properties.

  19. IMBH-SMBH Mergers • If cluster with IMBH sinks to center, IMBH likely to merge with SMBH later. • Signal strong enough to detect easily, but still is EMRI. • Rate? Properties of orbits?

  20. IMBH-SMBH Merger Sequence

  21. Conclusions • High density in clusters produces many potentially detectable GW sources. BH-BH, BH-IMBH, IMBH-IMBH, IMBH-SMBH. • Continued input from N-body community is essential!

More Related