300 likes | 452 Vues
This document discusses the principles and steps of Curriculum-Based Evaluation (CBE) as outlined by Dr. Gary L. Cates. It covers identifying learning problems, observing student performance, developing instructional plans, and evaluating their effectiveness. Key practices include the instructional hierarchy, addressing reading skills, comprehension strategies, and intervention techniques. Practical insights on mathematics assessments, error analysis, and setting achievable goals are also provided, emphasizing the importance of adapting teaching methods to diverse student needs for improved educational outcomes.
E N D
Curriculum Based Evaluation Gary L. Cates, Ph.D.
Steps to CBE • Identify the problem • Observe accuracy and fluency in specific skills (Probes/Assignments) • Develop a plan to address the problem • Instructional Hierarchy (Acquisition, Fluency, maintenance, Generalization, Adaptation) • Implement the plan • Intervention Articulation Form • Evaluate the plan • Single Case Research Design • Adapt the plan as needed • React to students responding
Curriculum Based Evaluation in Reading Gary L. Cates, Ph.D.
Decoding • AKA Reading • Carnine: • Teachers need right materials • Teachers need right training • Adams • Code instruction with meaning better for ALL readers • Rate of Decoding is essential in understanding differences in effects of various reading methods.
Important Points • Perceptual Processes: They matter very little. • Early Reading Skills: Teach older kids that do not have early literacy skills these skills? • Reading Levels: within text, across curricula • What about Grade Equivalents? • The right question: What skill does the student need to learn?
Error/Miscue Analysis • Variable empirical support • Problem with Operational Definitions • Should be an appropriate error sample (i.e. must make enough errors – 80-85%)
Pre-reading readiness • Book Orientation • Sentence, word, letter boundaries, • Letter names • Symbol recognition? • Word recognition • Word/sentence manipulation: Rain/Bow • Segmenting, rhyming, blending,
Hypothesis: Won’t do • Provide reinforcer for reading accurately (50% increase?)
Hypothesis: Error not important to meaning • Tally errors and get percent of words that violate meaning (i.e. would give you a different sentence understanding). • Shouldn’t be out of specified range.
Hypothesis: Code Structure is the issue • Read a passage and note errors. • Errors related to pattern in words? • Be sure to base this on opportunity for error not just percentage of errors.
Hypothesis: Word Substitutions are? • Related to phonics? • Misses phonetically regular portions of words • Can’t read non-sense words • Not related to phonics? • Provide assisted self-monitoring • Maybe not a problem (Check if affects to meaning)
Let’s Change our Thinking • Comprehension is a complex process • Let’s talk about how a reader “reacts” to their reading. • Answering questions, retelling, paraphrasing, cloze, maze, t/f etc.
9 Causes of Comprehension Failure • These are 9 things that a good reader does that a poor reader doesn’t. • If you want a cool round number (the top “10” reasons) the 10th is Insufficient reinforcement.
Strategies of Comprehension • Monitor for meaning and self-correct • Selective attention to text: Skimming, going over closely • Adjust for Text Difficulty: Change rate, rereading, highlighting • Connect with Prior Knowledge: • Clarify: Figure it out in some way to make it make sense (Ask for help?; Google)
Enablers of Comprehension • Decoding: 140 wcpm (after 3rd grade) • Vocabulary (Semantics) – 70% of the variability! • Definitions • Determining Word Meaning • Grammar (Syntax): Rare, but could be ESL • Prior Knowledge
Curriculum Based Evaluation in Math Gary L. Cates, Ph.D.
Mark • Mark is having difficulty with multiplication of fractions. An example of such a problem is: 5/6 x 3/9 = ? His answer to such a problem was 15/45 • Take some time to write down your thoughts about how to assess this problem fully and generate an intervention that may be helpful given a fictional hypothesis that you may formulate based on your assessment.
Mathematics Areas • Computation: Accurately and quickly responding with symbols of quantity • Concepts: Rules • Strategies: Need to be efficient • Facts: Numerical statements • Application: Using math • Sub-domains: Tool use, content knowledge, and Vocabulary • Problem-Solving: Using both computation and application.
Math Assessments • Irrelevant standards • Irrelevant formats • Lack empirically validated sequencing • Inadequate samples of student behavior • Provide little insight into why errors are made • Not aligned with instructional objectives
Interviewing & Error Analysis • 2 ways of collecting information for the development of a hypothesis • Interviewing • Error Analysis: Need a lot of problems of the same type (Facts, operations, applications)
Setting Goals with BMC considered • Consider Basic Movement Cycle (BMC) • Think of it as a “handicap” • Task Mastery Rate (TMR)= 50/minute • Current BMC = 75/minute • Expected BMC = 100/minute • Formula: (TMR * Current BMC)/(EBMC) • (50*75)/100 = 37.5 • With current BMC student should be able to make 37.5 DCPM
Let’s try an Example • Complete a probe and make a few errors (with pattern or without). • Exchange probes with a colleague. • Analyze a colleague’s probe for errors • Develop a hypothesis • Develop and intervention • Describe how you would evaluate the intervention
Curriculum Based Evaluation in Written Expression Gary L. Cates, Ph.D.
The writer as an Author • Purpose: Intent • The reader must know writer’s intent • Process • Planning: • Pre-writing: Intent and Style • During: Ongoing changes of style • Reviewing: constant recursive steps • Revision: Improvement of clarity of intent • Transcribing: “Editing” (Writer as secretary)
Writer as Author Continued • Product • Fluency: TWW and CWS • Syntactic Maturity: Complexity of sentences • Vocabulary: Sophistication and non-repeating • Content: Holistic rating/attention to organization • Conventions: Errors in mechanics
Assessment Options • Permanent products • Story Starters (younger kids) • Picture prompts could result in description only • Essays (older kids)
Measurement Options • Qualitative Scale (1 to 5 rating) • Not a normative Scaling! • Criterion Scale • Holistic Scale (4 tiers of papers?) • Teachers at each grade level divide best from worst and rate the others accordingly • How about for benchmarking? • Direct Measurement • NCW/L or W/LS • Important to adhere to “traits” you have chosen
Setting Goals • Develop Cut Scores (1.5 or 2x discrepancy from standard) • Set goal to close the gap between current performance and expectation
Instructional Ideas • Balanced Instruction: Pre-writing Planning • Teach The process: Planning, reviewing, revising, transcribing, peer collaboration • Teach fluency of expression: Read/write a lot. In different ways for different people • Balanced Mechanics: COPS • Note about spelling: Morphograph instruction and not word lists!