1 / 11

CCLI Vision and Scope

Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM SOLICITATION NSF 09-529. CCLI Vision and Scope. Vision: Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate students Supports efforts that

arawn
Télécharger la présentation

CCLI Vision and Scope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI)Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsPROGRAM SOLICITATION NSF 09-529

  2. CCLI Vision and Scope • Vision: Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate students • Supports efforts that • Bring advances in STEM disciplinary knowledge into curriculum • Create or adapt learning materials and teaching strategies • Develop faculty expertise • Promote widespread implementation of educational innovations • Prepare future K-12 teachers • Enhance our understanding of how students learn STEM topics • Enhance our understanding how faculty adopt instructional approaches • Build capacity for assessment and evaluation • Further the work of the program itself

  3. CCLI Vision and Scope (Cont) • Program especially encourages projects that: • Have potential to transform undergraduate STEM education • Produce widespread adoption of classroom practices based on how students learn • Explore cyberlearning

  4. PROJECT COMPONENTS • Creating Learning Materials and Strategies • Incorporate ideas from research on teaching and learning • Incorporate scientific advances in disciplines • Implementing New Instructional Strategies • Implement proven or promising techniques in ways that encourage widespread adoption • Add knowledge about transfer of strategies and impact on learning • Developing Faculty Expertise • Increase instructor’s knowledge and skills on curricula and teaching practices • Involve diverse group of faculty

  5. PROJECT COMPONENTS (cont) • Assessing and Evaluating Student Achievement • Develop and disseminate valid and reliable tests of STEM knowledge and skills • Collect, synthesize, and interpret information about students • Conducting Research on Undergraduate STEM Education • Explore how undergraduate STEM students learn • Explore how practices have diffused and how faculty and programs implement changes • NOTE: Instrumentation and equipment requests are appropriate -- based learning impact

  6. Important Project Features • Quality, Relevance, and Impact • Describe a recognized need or opportunity and an innovative approach • Student Focus • Link activities and improvements in STEM learning • Knowledge about STEM Education: • Build on existing work & disseminate new finding and results • STEM Education Community-Building • Interact with others in the STEM education community • Sustainability • Demonstrate reasonable expectation of persistent effects • Expected Measurable Outcomes • Describe goals & expected measurable outcomes • Project Evaluation • Monitor progress toward expected outcomes and success in achieving them

  7. Type 1 Projects • 70 to 75 awards expected • Total budget up to $200,000 for 2 to 3 years • 250,000 when 4-year and 2-year schools collaborate • Deadline • May 21, 2009 (A-M states) • May 22, 2009 (N-Z states) • Typically involve a single institution & one program component • Contribute to the understanding of undergraduate STEM education

  8. Type 2 Projects • 20 to 25 awards expected • Total budget up to $600,000 for 2 to 4 years. • Deadline January 13, 2010 • Typically involve multiple institutions & several program components – but exceptions • Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions • Produce evidence on the effectiveness • Institutionalize at the participating schools

  9. Type 3 Projects • 3 to 5 awards expected • Budget negotiable, but not to exceed $5,000,000 over 5 years. • Deadline January 13, 2010 • Large scale efforts • Typically based on prior work with results explicitly described – but exceptions • Produce evidence of student learning in a broad population • Describe impact of the work on the prevailing models • Describe strategies for implementation in new contexts

  10. CCLI Central Resource Projects • 1 to 3 awards expected • Budget negotiable, depending on the scope and scale of the activity • Small focused workshop projects -- 1 to 2 years & up to $100,000 • Large scale projects -- 3 to 5 years & $300,000 to $3,000,000 • Deadline January 13, 2010 • Implement activities to sustain the STEM community • Increase the capabilities of and communications in the STEM community • Increase and document the impact of CCLI projects

  11. NSF Merit Review Criteria`` • Standard intellectual merit and the broader impacts review criteria • Additional intellectual merit review criteria • Produce exemplary material, processes, or models that enhance student learning • Yield important findings related to student learning • Build on existing knowledge about STEM education • State expected outcomes & integrate them into evaluation plan • Describe evaluation plan that is likely to produce useful information • Additional broader impacts review criteria • Contribute to the understanding of STEM education • Help build the STEM education community • Have a broad impact on recognized need or opportunity • Have the potential to contribute to transformative change

More Related