1 / 9

Public consultation on air passenger rights

Public consultation on air passenger rights. Stakeholder Hearing Regulation (EC) 1107/2006 « PRM Regulation ». QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE PRM REGULATION (1107/2006). Questions relating to travel procedures for persons with reduced mobility (PRMs).

arden
Télécharger la présentation

Public consultation on air passenger rights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public consultation on air passenger rights Stakeholder Hearing Regulation (EC) 1107/2006 « PRM Regulation »

  2. QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE PRM REGULATION (1107/2006) Questions relating to travel procedures for persons with reduced mobility (PRMs)

  3. Harmonising policies or better information For PRMs using mobility or respiratory equipment or required to travel with an assistant during flights, do you think that air carriers should harmonise their policies or provide better information on these issues?

  4. Overview of responses

  5. Pre-notification at least 48 hours • Do you think the pre-notification at least 48 hours encouraged by regulation 1107 should be made compulsory, in order to provide better assistance to PRMs?

  6. Overview of responses

  7. Main conclusions • A majority of national authorities (40%) were in favour of harmonising policies or providing better information for PRMs, although 44% did not express an opinion on this issue. Again, a majority (40%) support compulsory 48 hrs pre-notification for PRM (44% without opinion). • The industry group was divided on the question of harmonising policies or providing better information for PRMs (40% in favour, 54% against). It was generally in favour of compulsory 48 hrs pre-notification (60%).

  8. Main conclusions, cont. • Consumer groups were highly in favour of harmonising policies or providing better information for PRMs (72%) and generally in favour of making a 48 hour pre-notification compulsory (59%). • Airports were strongly in favour of harmonising policies or providing better information for PRMs (79%) and generally in favour of making a pre-notification of at least 48 hours compulsory (64%).

  9. Thank you. PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON AIR PASSENGER RIGHTS

More Related