1 / 12

Managerial Economics: A Problem-solving Approach

Managerial Economics: A Problem-solving Approach . Why is teaching economics to MBA’s so difficult? . Students with varying backgrounds: English majors vs. Engineers; Econ. and Business majors; Executive MBA’s and non-degree Exec. Ed. Healthcare professionals etc

ariadne
Télécharger la présentation

Managerial Economics: A Problem-solving Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Managerial Economics:A Problem-solving Approach

  2. Why is teaching economics to MBA’s so difficult? • Students with varying backgrounds: • English majors vs. Engineers; • Econ. and Business majors; • Executive MBA’s and non-degree Exec. Ed. • Healthcare professionals • etc • Students want practical knowledge • Not abstract theory • Do MBA’s learn differently than we do?

  3. Solution • Use a problem-based pedagogy (instead of model-based) • Begin with a real business problem • Give students just enough analytical structure to understand the problem and find a solution • Teaches students to solve problems by • Identifying profitable decisions (benefit-cost analysis) • And implement them (principal-agent theory) • Links study of economics to other MBA disciplines • Accounting, finance, statistics, marketing, strategy, operations

  4. Example: Over-bidding OCS gas tract • A young geologist was preparing a bid recommendation for an gas tract in his exploration to oil • With knowledge of the productivity of neighboring tracts also owned by company, the geologist recommended a bid of BD5000000 • Senior management, though, bid BD21000000 - far over the next highest-bid of BD 750,000. • What, if anything, is wrong? • The goal of this text is to provide tools to help diagnose and solve problems like this.

  5. Analyze the over-bidding mistake • Another clue: • After winning the bid, the geologist increased the estimated reserves of the company. • But, after a “dry” well was drilled, the reserve estimates were decreased. • Senior Management stepped in and rejected the decrease in the estimate (kept it high) • Last clue: • Senior management resigned several months later.

  6. ANSWER: Manager bonuses for increasing reserves • The bonus system created incentives to over-bid. • Senior managers were rewarded for acquiring reserves regardless of their profitability • Bonuses also created incentive to manipulate the reserve estimate.

  7. Problem solving • Two distinct steps: • Figure out what’s wrong, i.e., why the bad decision was made • Figure out how to fix it • Both steps require a model of behavior • Why are people making mistakes? • What can we do to make them change? • Economists use the rational actor paradigm to model behavior. The rational actor paradigm states: • People act rationally, optimally, self-interestedly • i.e., they respond to incentives – to change behavior you must change incentives.

  8. Keep the ultimate goal in mind Align the incentives of employees with the profitability goals of the company. • How do we make sure employees have the information necessary to make good decisions? • And the incentive to do so?

  9. what is wrong • Under the rational actor paradigm, mistakes are made for one of two reasons: • lack of information or • bad incentives. • To diagnose a problem, ask 3 questions: 1. Who is making bad decision? 2. Do they have enough info to make a good decision? 3. Do they have the incentive to do so?

  10. How to fix it • The answers will suggest one or more solutions: 1. Let someone else make the decision, someone with better information or incentives. 2. Change the information flow. 3. Change incentives • Change performance evaluation methods within your firm • Change reward scheme • Use benefit-cost analysis to choose the best (most profitable?) solution …….. Mohammed Give them information about Break Even here

  11. Coverage • Traditional coverage (see TOC) • Changes to second edition • Examples from the financial crisis • Additional material • Insights from behavioral econ (psychological pricing, barriers to rational decision making) • Iceland: Trade, Foreign Exchange, Bubbles • Chapters cut into smaller pieces • Uncertainty & Auctions • Long-run equilibrium & Strategy

  12. 1. Introduction: What this book is about • 2. The one lesson of business • Benefits, costs and decisions • 4. Extent (how much) decisions • 5. Investment decisions: Look ahead and reason back • 6. Simple pricing • Economies of scale and scope • 8. Understanding markets and industry changes • 9. Relationships between industries: The forces moving us towards long-run equilibrium • 10. Strategy, the quest to slow profit erosion • 11. Using supply and demand: Trade, bubbles, market making • 12. More realistic and complex pricing • 13. Direct price discrimination • 14. Indirect price discrimination • 15. Strategic games • 16. Bargaining • 17. Making decisions with uncertainty • The problem of adverse selection • The problem of moral hazard • 21. Getting employees to work in the best interests of the firm • 22. Getting divisions to work in the best interests of the firm • 23. Managing vertical relationships • 24. You be the consultant • EPILOG: Can those who teach, do? Managerial Economics - Table of contents

More Related