1 / 8

Summary of HEW Straw Poll Results and Performance Metrics Preferences

This document outlines the findings of the HEW straw polls, highlighting preferences for Performance Assessment Reports (PAR). The majority favored quantitative PAR focused on specific metrics of improvement. Key discussions included the number of performance metrics to include, with a clear preference for per-STA throughput and area throughput. Additionally, the document provides a detailed SG timeline relating to IEEE 802 Working Groups and their consensus-building efforts on the PAR, emphasizing international cooperation in this technical domain.

arlen
Télécharger la présentation

Summary of HEW Straw Poll Results and Performance Metrics Preferences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HEW SG Straw Polls Results Authors: • Date:2013-12-02 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  2. Abstract • This submission summarizes the results of the HEW straw polls and provides a detailed SG timeline Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  3. SP #1 • What type of PAR do you prefer? (choose one) • 1.   Qualitative PAR that includes words like “improve”, “higher”, “better”, etc. • 2.   Quantitative PAR that includes words like “x times improvement”. Etc. • Majority is for quantitative PAR • How to find the percentage improvement in metric(s) of interest? Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  4. SP #2 • How many performance metrics should be included in the PAR scope? (choose one) • 1.       One metric • 2.       Two metrics • 3.       More than two metrics Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  5. SP #3 • If one performance metric, which metric should be included in the PAR scope? (choose one) • 1.       Link throughput (bps) • 2.       Area throughput (bps/m2) • 3.       Per STA throughput (bps) • 4.        Frame delay (msec) • 5.       Frame delay variations (jitter) (msec) • 6.       Power efficiency • Clear preference of per STA throughput and are throughput as performance metrics • Both metrics are dependant on each other Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  6. SP #4 • If more than one metric, which metrics should be included in the PAR scope? (Choose more than one) • 1.       Link throughput (bps) • 2.       Area throughput (bps/m2) • 3.       Per STA throughput (bps) • 4.        Frame delay (msec) • 5.       Frame delay variations (jitter) (msec) • 1.       Power efficiency • The result is consistent with SP #3 result Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  7. Detailed Timeline IEEE 802 WGs comments PAR Editing PAR Editing Dec Jan Feb March Dec 4 Dec 18 TG in May/July Telecon Telecon Deadline for the PAR To be on the EC Agenda March Meeting March 16-21 IEEE 802 EC Meeting January Meeting Jan 19-24 Reach consensus on PAR HEW Tutorial Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

  8. References Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)

More Related