1 / 12

Preliminary 2005 ISAT & IMAGE Data

Preliminary 2005 ISAT & IMAGE Data. U-46 School Board Monday, August 1, 2005 Assessment in the Service of Student Learning Ed DeYoung Ext.5382. Celebration of Progress!! (1). Two schools, Channing and Hilcrest, made AYP for the 2 nd year in a row: FREE of SANCTIONS!

arlo
Télécharger la présentation

Preliminary 2005 ISAT & IMAGE Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preliminary 2005 ISAT & IMAGE Data U-46 School Board Monday, August 1, 2005 Assessment in the Service of Student Learning Ed DeYoung Ext.5382

  2. Celebration of Progress!! (1) • Two schools, Channing and Hilcrest, made AYP for the 2nd year in a row: FREE of SANCTIONS! • Dramatic reduction in # of schools not making AYP • In 2004, 14 elementary schools did not make AYP • In 2005, 7 elementary schools did not make AYP

  3. Celebration of Progress!! (2) • Dramatic increase in # of schools with potential to be FREE of SANCTIONS in 2006 • In 2004, 2 schools “in action” made AYP • In 2005, 5 schools ‘in action” made AYP, in addition to Channing & Hilcrest. • Dramatic reduction in # of schools in danger of entering the “sanction zone” • In 2004, 6 ‘new’ schools did not make AYP • In 2005, 2 ‘new’ schools did not make AYP

  4. Celebration of Progress!! (3) • Dramatic increase in reading in middle schools • In 2004, 1 of 7 schools made AYP in all reading areas • In 2005, 7 of 8 schools made AYP in all reading areas • Huff made AYP in 2005 • More students in every group at Garfield were successful in 2005 than did in 2004

  5. Cohort One: 2003

  6. Cohort One 2004

  7. Cohort One: 2005

  8. Factors Influencing 2005 AYP Status • Increase in standard to 47.5% from 40% in 2004 • District interventions • Changes in procedures to determine 2005 AYP • IMPACT of the above: • Many subgroups in schools that did not make AYP would have if standard had not increased to 47.5% • Making AYP was often a function of the combination of interventions and procedure changes.

  9. 2005 AYP Computation Procedure changes • Subgroup size increases to 45 from 40 • “Confidence band” set at 95% - which will vary with subgroup size • IMAGE scale score needed to “pass” changed to provide parity with ISAT

  10. IMAGE: ELL students (ES) In 2005, 4th grade did not take IMAGE In 2005, 4th grade did not IMAGE In 2002-2004, 3rd, 4th, & 5th grade took IMAGE J. Ridenour J. Ridenour

  11. IMAGE: ELL students (MS) In 2005, 7th grade did not take IMAGE In 2002-2004, 7th & 8th grade took IMAGE J. Ridenour J. Ridenour

  12. The Opportunity and Caution • 2004-05 was one step in the journey • In 2005-06: • Group sizes will double • The standard remains the same @ 47.5% • “Potential” to move five schools to be FREE of SANCTIONS • Takes two years of not making AYP to be required to provide extra services • Once required to provide extra services, takes two years to be freed of that obligation. • Diagnostic work for 2005-06 continues for students in all schools

More Related