1 / 14

Shailendra Mishra

Shailendra Mishra. Director (CEP). Case Study – Collusion detection in multi-player Games. Consider the following problem: (A) Commits an identity theft. (A) Acquires (n) credit cards as a result of the identity theft.

armando-buckner
Télécharger la présentation

Shailendra Mishra

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shailendra Mishra Director (CEP)

  2. Case Study – Collusion detection in multi-player Games • Consider the following problem: • (A) Commits an identity theft. • (A) Acquires (n) credit cards as a result of the identity theft. • (A) Goes to an online gaming site uses the credit cards to play online poker with his (s) friends. • (A) loses all his money to his (s) friends. • The online gaming company has to now pay his friends. • Analysis of the problem • Assume, for a moment that (A) didn’t commit identity theft. • (A) is playing a fair game with his friends or otherwise. • The results of this game, generate a stream of outcomes of wins and losses by (A) to any no. of his friends where 1<= i <= s. • The problem is to detect whether the pattern of wins and losses are genuine or not. • More formally, we are asking: • “When is a certain number of a particular subsequence unlikely to be fortuitous”.

  3. Modeling the Collusion Detection Problem • Let T be an ordered sequence of events. • Let W be the window observation of size w within which the analysis is confined. • Formally consider an alphabet  of cardinality |  |. • Consider an event sequence T = t1, t2,…tn of length n over . • We then define an episode over  as follows: • Single pattern S = s1s2s3…sm of length m • Set of patterns S1,S2,…,Sd . • Set of all distinct permutations of S where ordering within window of observation doesn’t matter.

  4. Formal Statement of the Problem • Assume event sequence is generated by a memory less Bernoulli or Markov source. • Let’s restate our problem formally – we are interested in finding Ω∃(n, w, m) that represents the number of windows containing atleast one occurrence of S, when sliding the window n events over T. • To address this: • Compute the Expected value Ω∃ (n, w, m). • Compute Var(Ω∃ (n, w, m). • Show that Ω∃ (n, w, m) converges to a normal distribution. • Allows us to set a threshold (n, m, w) s.t for a given confidence level  that P{(Ω (n, w, m) > (n, w, m))} < . • Implies, For (n, w, m) occurrences of such windows, probability that such a number is generated by randomness is highly unlikely.

  5. Formulation of equivalent Pattern Matching Problem • Given an alphabet Д = {a1, a2, …, a | Д |} and a pattern S=s1s2…sm of length m. • Search occurrences of S as subsequence within a window W of size w in another sequence known as the event sequence T = t1t2..tn of length n. • A valid occurrence of S in T corresponds to a set of integers i1, i2,..,im such that the following hold: • 1 <=i1 < i2 < … < im <= n • ti1 = s1, ti2 = s2, … tim = sm • im – i1 < w • We now estimate Ω∃ (n, w, m, S, Д) which represents #(windows) that contains atleast one occurrence of S, when sliding window over n consecutive events in event sequence T over alphabet Д.

  6. Theorams & Results – Gwadera, Attalah & Szpankowski (Purdue) • Consider a memoryless source with pi being the probability of generating symbol ai εД. • Also, assume P(S) = ∏mi=1 pi • Result -1: Probability that a window of size w contains atleast one occurrence of episode S. For all m and w >= m we have: P∃(w, m) = P(S) ∑ w-mi=0 ∑ ∑ k=0mnk ∏qknk where qk = 1-pk • Result -2: Let now m be fixed and i ≠ j => pi ≠ pj, then for any ε > 0: P∃(w, m) = 1 - P(S) ∑ mi=1 ∑ (1-pi)w /pi ∏j≠Im 1/(pj-pi) + O(εw) where w -> ∞

  7. Computation of Bounds • Assume a memoryless source, then for x = O(1), we have limn->∞P{Ω∃ (n, w, m)-E(Ω∃ (n, w, m))/√(Var(P(Ω∃ (n, w, m)) < x} = 1/2π∫-∞x exp(-t2/2)dt for a fixed m and w. Now let’s establish the threshold for (n, m, w). First we find an α0 for a given β s.t β = ∫ α0∞ exp(-t2/2)dt = P {N(0, 1) > α0} Where N(0, 1) is the standard normal distribution. We set the threshold: (n, w, m) = E(Ω∃ (n, w, m) + √Var(Ω∃ (n, w, m) As long as we are in the region where central limit theoram applies P{Ω∃ (n, w, m) > (n, w, m) <= β

  8. Q & A

  9. Shailendra Mishra Director (CEP)

  10. SQL Standards update • Pattern Matching Proposal – Version 12 of the review draft has been circulated. • Participants – Coral8 <some parts>, IBM, Oracle, Streambase. • BEA systems also reviewed the draft. • Status – 12th version of the draft is ready and has been circulated. • Objective - Submit a working draft to ANSI SQL • Discussing a streams language proposal with IBM • Participants IBM & ORACLE • Status – Exchanged Docs. Regarding language specifications • Objective - Submit a working draft to ANSI SQL • Discussing convergence language proposal with Streambase • Participants IBM & Streambase • Status – Discussing convergence proposal for the last 6 months • Objective - Submit a paper to Transactions on Databases (TODS)

  11. Pattern Query With ONE ROW PER MATCH SELECTa_symbol, a_tstamp, /* start time */, a_price, /* start price */, max_c_tstamp, /* inflection time */, last_c_price, /* low price */, max_f_tstamp, /* end time */, last_c_price, /* end price */, Matchno FROMTickerMATCH_RECOGNIZE (PARTITION BYSymbol MEASURESA.Symbol AS a_symbol, A.Tstamp AS a_tstamp, A.Price AS a_price, MAX (C.Tstamp) AS max_c_tstamp, LAST (C.Price) AS last_c_price, MAX (F.Tstamp) AS max_f_tstamp MATCH_NUMBERASmatchno ONE ROW PER MATCH AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW MAXIMAL MATCH PATTERN (A B C* D E* F+) DEFINEBAS(B.price < PREV(B.price)), CAS(C.price <= PREV(C.price)), DAS(D.Price > PREV(D.price)), EAS(E.Price >= PREV(E.Price)), FAS(F.Price >= PREV(F.price) ANDF.price > A.price))

  12. Pattern Query With All ROWs PER MATCH SELECTa_symbol, a_tstamp, /* start time */, a_price, /* start price */, max_c_tstamp, /* inflection time */, last_c_price, /* low price */, max_f_tstamp, /* end time */, last_c_price, /* end price */, Matchno FROMTickerMATCH_RECOGNIZE (PARTITION BYSymbol MEASURESA.Symbol AS a_symbol, A.Tstamp AS a_tstamp, A.Price AS a_price, MAX (C.Tstamp) OVER () AS max_c_tstamp, LAST (C.Price) OVER () AS last_c_price, MAX (F.Tstamp) OVER () AS max_f_tstamp MATCH_NUMBERASmatchno CLASSIFIER AS classy AFTER ROW PER MATCH AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW MAXIMAL MATCH PATTERN (A B C* D E* F+) DEFINEBAS(B.price < PREV(B.price)), CAS(C.price <= PREV(C.price)), DAS(D.Price > PREV(D.price)), EAS(E.Price >= PREV(E.Price)), FAS(F.Price >= PREV(F.price) ANDF.price > A.price))

  13. MATCH_RECOGNIZE syntax The full syntax of the MATCH_RECOGNIZE clause is as under: PARTITION BY — optional MEASURES - optional, but we expect this will always be used { ONE ROW | ALL ROWS } PER MATCH — default to ONE ROW AFTER MATCH SKIP { TO NEXT ROW | PAST LAST ROW | TO <variable> | TO LAST<variable> | TO FIRST <variable> } - default AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW { MAXIMAL | INCREMENTAL } MATCH - defaults to MAXIMAL MATCH PERMUTE – optional PERMUTE EXPAND - optional PATTERN — mandatory SUBSET — optional DEFINE — mandatory CLASSIFIER - optional (ALL ROWS PER MATCH only) MATCH_NUMBER - optional

  14. Q & A

More Related