1 / 20

ISSAG Viterbo - 22 / 26 August 2005

ISSAG Viterbo - 22 / 26 August 2005. CONTRIBUTION TO FINE MAPPING OF OL-2 LOCUS IN TOMATO. MINOIA SILVIA. Department of Agro-forestry and Environmental Biology and Chemistry Sect. Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Bari (Italy).

arne
Télécharger la présentation

ISSAG Viterbo - 22 / 26 August 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ISSAG Viterbo - 22 / 26 August 2005 • CONTRIBUTION TO FINE MAPPING OF OL-2 LOCUS IN TOMATO MINOIA SILVIA Department of Agro-forestry and Environmental Biology and Chemistry Sect. Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Bari (Italy)

  2. Powdery mildew caused by Oidium lycopersici on tomato’s leaves

  3. L. esculentum cv.SuperMarmande: SM Susceptible L. esculentum var. cerasiforme: R28 Resistant Resistant Susceptible

  4. Sources of resistance to the fungus are available in wild material and in particular in the accession of L. esculentum var. cerasiforme,we have selected a line (LC-95) resulting in complete resistance to powdery mildew, and also showed that a single recessive gene, named ol-2, was responsible for desease control.

  5. Our first step was isolated a RAPD marker (OPU31500) linked to ol-2 gene to using a “Bulked Segregant Analysis” (BSA): it was detected in the susceptible bulk. The OPU31500 was converted to a CAPS marker and the estimation of the distance between the marker and the ol-2 gene was identified by linkage analysis in the F2 population.

  6. SM R28 F2 Resistant F2 Susceptible BLKS BLKR F2 Susceptible F2 Resistant R28 SM F1

  7. Electrophoretic patterns of PCR-amplified DNA products obtained with OPU3 primer 5'-CTATGCCGA-3' from genomic DNA of parents (SM susceptible; R28 resistant), susceptible F1 plants, bulks (BLKS, bulk of F2 susceptible plants; BLKR, bulk of F2 resistant plants) and all the individuals included in the bulks (lanes 1-9 susceptible; lanes 10-19 resistant): the absence of the 1.5 kb band, indicated with the arrow and designated OPU31500, is associated with resistance. M1 and M2, DNA molecular weight markers (1kb and 100bp Ladders, respectively)

  8. chromosome 4 +GP180 4-A IL4-1-1 GP180 (CT122C,CT63C,TG413B,TG49, 6Pgdh-1) 3.7 4-B CD59 2.9 -TG15 TG15,CT229A +CT229A 12.1 (CD49A) IL4-1 TG370 4-C 4.6 (CT269B,TG123) TG483 IL4-2 3.4 Tpi-2 4.3 -CT175 +TG182 TG474,TG339 1.1 CT175 0.8 TG182,CT192 4-D +TG182 (CD70,TG146) 5.5 -CT157 CT157 3.9 (TG609,CT162,PC1, Pgm-2, Got-1) 4-E TG506,TG2 IL4-3-2 (GP221,TG316,CT261,TG268,CT181,CT145B) 2.4 TG652,CT259 3.6 (CT97,TG516) TG287 (TG633,PC3,CT178) 1.2 +TG208 TG208 2.1 (TG272B,TG95, Adh-1) -TG75A TG75A 4-F 0.8 CD55 +CD55 (CT286) 6.0 -TG519 TG519,TG264,TG635,CT194 4.6 (CT185) TG62,TG427,CT161 8.9 (CT188) IL4-3 TG65 4-G 8.0 (TG120) TG574 (TG305,CT132A, CT264) 3.5 TG555 2.1 TG155 9.4 -TG155 +CT50 CT287B (TG34) 5.6 CT50 1.0 4-H TG500 1.0 CT133 (TG443) 3.5 CD39,CT73 (TG260) 4.9 +CP57 CP57 2.3 IL4-4 -CT173 CT173 1.6 TG22,CT126B (CT253,CT239A,TG37X) 5.8 4-I TG163,CT224B,CT199 3.8 (CT61) TG464,TG498,TG587 +TG464

  9. Our second step was to identify AFLP markers always associated at the ol-2 gene. We found 8 new molecular markers.

  10. Linkage group E39/M37(290) on Ol-2locus 3.2 E32/M47(174) E32/M50(174) E40/M56(100) 0.3 E34/M61(270) 0.4 E42/M45(248) E41/M32(390) 0.2 OPU3 0.5 ol-2 CAPS/OPU3 cM E32/M53(280)

  11. The finale purpose of our investigation is to identify molecular markers linked to resistance and to use these markers for MAS (marker assistent selection), to set up improved lines of tomato resistant to powdery mildew (Oidium lycopersicum).

  12. RESEARCH AIMS To identify new PCR-based molecular markers linked to ol-2 gene To establish a linkage group for Ol-2 locus To obtain co-dominant markers useful to perform MAS in tomato: in particular to converted the 8 AFLP marker in SCAR or CAPS markers.

  13. Lambda DNA ng/µl DNA Marker 30 60 90 EcoRI 32/MseI 53 EcoRI 41/MseI 32 EcoRI 34/MseI 61 3 2 1 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 3 EcoRI 34/MseI 61 (2) 4 3 2 4 1 SCAR MARKERS SCAR markers obtained from conversion of new AFLP polymorphic markers Legend: SM= 1; R28=2; BLKS=3; BLKR=4 DNA Marker= 25bp

  14. When we begins work with this CAPS markers started our problems: • the fragments that we amplified were small (between 100-300 bp) • when we cutted with restiction enzymes we obteined smaller fragments and we lost the polymorphism.

  15. LMS-PCR technique(Schupp et al., 1999) (Ligation-Mediated Suppression PCR) this is an systematic approach to obtain, from AFLP markers, information about internal and flanking sequence.

  16. ‘Wolking’ on the genome, we arrive to amplify unknown regions flanking known AFLP regions and then to lengthen our fragments. Starting from 100-300 bp fragments we obteined fragments of 1000 bp.

  17. Our work is in progress… …

  18. THANK’S FOR YOUR ATTENTION

  19. Michelmore RW, Paran RV, Kesseli, Identification of marker linked to desease resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating population, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) 9828-9833. Schupp JM, Price LB, Klevytska A and Keim P, 1999. Internal and flanking sequence from AFLP fragment using ligation-mediated suppression PCR. BioTechniques 26, 905-912.

  20. Steps of LMS-PCR technique: • to digest genomic DNA • to attach adaptors • to amplify it using primers of known sequence and adaptor primers

More Related