1 / 68

MSM Vs LOP H/W

MSM Vs LOP H/W. Craik & Tulving Study of Levels of processing (1975). Standardised Instructions. Write yes in the top left hand corner of a sheet of paper Write no in the top right hand corner of the same sheet

arva
Télécharger la présentation

MSM Vs LOP H/W

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MSM Vs LOP H/W

  2. Craik & TulvingStudy of Levels of processing (1975)

  3. Standardised Instructions • Write yes in the top left hand corner of a sheet of paper • Write no in the top right hand corner of the same sheet • You will see a slide with a question followed by another slide with a one word answer. • Point to the correct answer (yes if correct or no if incorrect) on your sheet • There will be 2 seconds between each answer slide (4 in between each question relating to that word). • The next 2 slides is an example of the type of question:

  4. Example Does the word fit the sentence ‘ I use a ……… to write with’

  5. Example pen

  6. Ok ready to start?

  7. Is the word in capital letters?

  8. FIELD

  9. Does the word fit the category ‘a type of pudding’?

  10. fence

  11. Does the word fit the sentence ‘ I ……… because I like being active’

  12. dance

  13. Does the word rhyme with ‘lush’

  14. BRUSH

  15. Does the word fit the category ‘a type of food’?

  16. HONEY

  17. Does the word fit the sentence ‘I go to ……. When it is late’

  18. lamp

  19. Does the word fit the category ‘a type of mineral’?

  20. POOL

  21. Does the word rhyme with ‘trunk’

  22. twig

  23. Does the word fit the sentence ‘please shut the ………….’

  24. CLAW

  25. Is the word in lower case letters?

  26. sheet

  27. Does the word rhyme with ‘ship’?

  28. SOAP

  29. Does the word fit the sentence ‘the …….. gives us medicine.’

  30. NURSE

  31. Is the word in lower case letters?

  32. GLOVE

  33. Does the word fit the category ‘part of a ship’?

  34. mast

  35. Does the word rhyme with ‘noose’

  36. juice

  37. Is the word in capital letters?

  38. daisy

  39. Thank you. That completes this part of the study

  40. Now answer these maths questions • 7x9 • 4x6 • 8x7 • 12x11 • 13x5 • 4x4

  41. How did you do? • 7x9 = 63 • 4x6 =24 • 8x7 =56 • 12x11 =132 • 13x5 =65 • 4x4 =16

  42. On the next slide you will see all the target words used. • Write down as many as you can remember.

  43. speech • brush • nurse • robber • fiddle • twig • claw • juice • singer • rice • floor • glass • lamp • cherry • mast • sheet • pool • lane • rose • child • daisy • field • dance • pond • copper • soap • honey • boat • glove • bear • fence • cart

  44. speech • brush • nurse • robber • fiddle • twig • claw • juice • singer • rice • floor • glass • lamp • cherry • mast • sheet • pool • lane • rose • child • daisy • field • dance • pond • copper • soap • honey • boat • glove • bear • fence • cart

  45. Which of these was on the first slide? Check how many you got. Which were structural (shallow), phonemic (intermediate), semantic (deep)?

  46. All notes to be taken on worksheet

  47. Aim • Craik & Tulving wanted to test the levels of processing (LOP) framework. • They wanted to see if structural processing led to low recall, phonetic processing led to better recall and semantic processing led to the best recall.

  48. Aim • When referring to better recall they meant that the memory trace was durable – it would fade most quickly when material was structurally processed and least quickly with semantic processing. • Craik & Tulving also wanted to investigate if semantic processing meant processing for a longer time.

  49. Procedure • They operationalised (measured) the shallow processing by asking participants to consider the structure of the words, such as whether the word was in upper or lower case letters. • They operationalised intermediate processing by asking participants to consider whether the word rhymed with another word or not, which is phonetic processing. • They operationalised deep processing by asking participants to answer questions based on considering the meaning of the word, which is semantic processing.

  50. Procedure • After all the questions had been answered, the participants were given an unexpected recognition task. • 40 questions had been asked, so there were 40 words on the test condition; then the recognition tasks used 80 words and the participants had to say whether the words had been part of the task or not. • Repeated measures design was used (what is this? What are the strengths & weaknesses?).

More Related